Jump to content

Photos from a WiMax Protection Site in Ponce, Puerto Rico


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

S4GRU member, kendog, Tweeted to me photos of his WiMax Protection Site in Ponce, Puerto Rico. See below:

 

AmwijQgCEAEBMoh.jpg

WiMax Protection Site - Ponce, Puerto Rico. Click to Enlarge.

 

 

AmwioZoCMAADZgy.jpg

WiMax Protection Site - Ponce, Puerto Rico. Click to Enlarge.

 

 

 

AmwjIGyCEAIs3EY.jpg

Another Sprint CDMA Site - Ponce, Puerto Rico. Click to Enlarge.

 

 

 

AmwlpP-CIAAD7LA.jpg

Another Sprint CDMA Site - Ponce, Puerto Rico. Click to Enlarge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its funny to me when I see these gigantic cell phone towers. They're not nearly this much of an eye sore around PHX. In fact, many of the new ones you would mistake for a palm tree.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its funny to me when I see these gigantic cell phone towers. They're not nearly this much of an eye sore around PHX. In fact, many of the new ones you would mistake for a palm tree.

 

 

I think those things would look out of place in Louisiana :-) I for one think they are ugly...nothing wrong with the look of a cell tower to me. If you bitch about the look of a cell tower and don't want it in your town then you have no right to complain about coverage on your diamond encrusted iPhone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think those things would look out of place in Louisiana :-) I for one think they are ugly...nothing wrong with the look of a cell tower to me. If you bitch about the look of a cell tower and don't want it in your town then you have no right to complain about coverage on your diamond encrusted iPhone.

 

Easy stinger... I wasn't "bitching" about the towers at all. Nor do I own a "diamond encrusted iPhone" (not a single iDevice here, for that matter). I was simply showing how they are doing some of the towers in PHX. So, no need to make assumptions and get hostile.

 

PS. They make the "hidden towers" in the form of various other types of trees as well. Perhaps this style would better fit your geographical placement. ;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Easy stinger... I wasn't "bitching" about the towers at all. Nor do I own a "diamond encrusted iPhone" (not a single iDevice here, for that matter). I was simply showing how they are doing some of the towers in PHX. So, no need to make assumptions and get hostile.

 

PS. They make the "hidden towers" in the form of various other types of trees as well. Perhaps this style would better fit your geographical placement.

 

 

The comment wasn't directed at you unless you had a diamond encrusted iPhone and hated cell phone towers :-)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The comment wasn't directed at you unless you had a diamond encrusted iPhone and hated cell phone towers :-)

 

Haha! Love cell phone towers... and for the iPhone.. just read some of my other posts. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easy stinger... I wasn't "bitching" about the towers at all. Nor do I own a "diamond encrusted iPhone" (not a single iDevice here, for that matter). I was simply showing how they are doing some of the towers in PHX. So, no need to make assumptions and get hostile.

 

PS. They make the "hidden towers" in the form of various other types of trees as well. Perhaps this style would better fit your geographical placement. ;)

 

 

Still the wrong kind of tree... Katrina, Rita, and Gustav cleaned all of our pine trees right out.

 

In all seriousness, we don't have short towers like that anywhere around here. All of ours are much taller towers. There's one "tree" antenna in the middle of an apartment complex parking lot. The only one I know of around here. It looks so out of place and retarded looking. Its brown and has dead tree limbs near the rack of antennas. Looks like a cell phone tower with some crap hanging off the side to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe it or not, the palm tree towers in Phoenix fit right in. They are a bit taller then the average palm, but from a distance, you can't even tell its a cell phone tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the pine tree ones they use here in some places of Northern New Mexico. The native ponderosa pines are between 30' - 50' tall. Then there are these faux mutant pines with a glandular diseases that are 3 times wider and double the height. They look like they are examples of high doses of RF exposure. They actual blend in worse than the normal towers.

:imo:

 

To me, in this day and age, most modern towers are like white noise...perhaps white visual pollution? We just don't even really notice them anymore. At least I don't. And I look for the darn things!!!

 

And I do find it amazing that the NIMBY-assed folks who whine the most about the visual pollution, usually have an iPhone in their hand. Just an observation. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I would share some pics with you at a non-conventional cell site here locally near Santa Fe, New Mexico. This is a 'covert' site that I don't mind so much. It looks better than faux mutant pines.

 

These are at the Santa Fe Opera house. The US 84/285 Freeway connects Santa Fe with the Los Alamos/Española/Taos region and this is a heavily traveled highway in our area. Especially at rush hour. However, for approximately a 1-1/2 mile section, this freeway was a RF black hole, with no carriers being able to cover. There is only one piece of property with a perch that could accommodate a site that could cover this section of freeway. The Santa Fe Opera.

 

Needless to say, the demographics who support the Opera, are not fans of cell towers. AT&T, Verizon, Alltel, Sprint and Cricket wanted to be on the site too. They worked out a solution where the property owner developed the site, including shared fiber backhaul provided by the Owner. Antenna/panels were mounted to the parking lot light standards (poles) that are at the edge of the bluff overlooking the freeway. There is one hidden shared equipment yard behind coyote fencing. Coax runs are pretty long to the furthest set of panels. Maybe 500'? But since they are only aimed to cover a 1-1/2 mile section of freeway, it's no biggie.

 

I like these types of solutions. Just integrating new cell sites within existing infrastructure. Pretty neat stuff.

 

gallery_1_1_32363.jpg

Driving down Freeway frontage toward Santa Fe Opera. A little blurry, zoomed in shot.

 

 

 

gallery_1_1_13346.jpg

Santa Fe Opera zoom shot, light standards and panels now coming more into view.

 

 

 

gallery_1_1_125633.jpg

Good overview shot from the parking lot at Santa Fe Opera. You can see four of the six sets from here. Also, down in the noted set of pinion bushes is where the equipment cabinets are located.

 

 

 

gallery_1_1_90963.jpg

Good view of a typical set of panels on the light standards.

 

 

 

gallery_1_1_85878.jpg

Here is the equipment yard, hidden behind a coyote fence. Radios are here. This site will likely not be able to have remote RRU's when NV occurs.

 

 

 

gallery_1_1_58708.jpg

Looking down a row of them.

 

 

 

gallery_1_1_69552.jpg

One final shot, looking toward the Opera. Not visually polluting at all!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe it or not, the palm tree towers in Phoenix fit right in. They are a bit taller then the average palm, but from a distance, you can't even tell its a cell phone tower.

 

They look ok when near palm trees its the ones that are out in the middle of nowhere and well over twice as tall as any palm tree on the planet that just look wrong.. I have one down the road from me off hardy and university in tempe that i didnt even notice was there till i sitting at the light something caught my eye and i noticed it, i lived next to it for 2 years that one blends in.. theres one off the 202 in mesa that stands out so bad that i think its worse than any of them i have seen.. its more of an eye sore than if they just left the tower out in the open, you expect a tall tower, you probably wouldnt even look at it twice, but a 100 foot palm tree now that gets attention lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Here is a screen shot of a tower that has been built into a cross high on a mesa in Farmington' date=' NM. (Sorry had to use Google maps to get it)[/quote']

 

I've used this site before. I live in New Mexico. :)

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I grew up in F-town. I worked for a computer store across the street from that site when Sprint first came into town and we were a retailer for a short period. I remember the rep telling us about them installing it and the lengths that Sprint goes to accomadate the land owners.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Two "covert" sites I know of in Waterloo, Iowa.

 

The first one, is a flag pole:

 

http://maps.google.c...2,28.8,,0,-9.77

 

The second, as posted above, is a cross:

 

http://maps.google.c...210.58,,0,-7.53

 

I never looked at who the carriers are for these towers, just thought it fit into the conversation that has been going on in this thread. They both blend in fairly well, though for years I wondered why we needed a pole that large for such a little flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • While I've been loath to update my Samsung devices past the May 2022 update to keep the Band Selection tool, I note that it looks like Android 14 is going to add Timing Advance for NR to the API.  (Was looking today as I have another Verizon A42 5G now that I'm going to unlock for T-Mobile, and wanted to figure out if I should let it update or not.)  Since I can technically make band changes from *#73#, on the A42 5Gs, I can probably live without the Band Selection tool if a later Android version adds something useful like TA values. I assume SCP will be updated to support that once it becomes publicly available.  The real question is whether or not the phones will support it.  My S21FE and A42 5G devices do on LTE, but I know the S22 and the A32 5G do not support it even on LTE, providing just zero in that field. - Trip
    • The A23 5G appears to support all of the Dish NR bands except n26 which they don't even own yet, and n29 which as SDL can't be logged as far as I can tell.  https://www.phonescoop.com/phones/phone.php?p=6760  I mean, n71, n66, and n70 are there, and those are the ones I'm most concerned about. I know that's not trade press, but I've found Phone Scoop to tend to be missing bands rather than including bands that should be there. I don't really care if it's carrier locked; if I'm buying a device specifically for Dish, then I'm probably not switching it out in the immediate future. - Trip
    • I mapped out the various phone choices to Dish's NR bands.  Used trade press for many of the phones, which can be unreliable.  Just starting with N71, you are down to three phones: Moto G Stylus 5G 2022, Moto Edge+ (2022), Celero 5G+.  Add in the less frequent n66 and you are down to: Moto G Stylus 5G 2022, Moto Edge+ (2022).  The Moto G Stylus 5G 2022 then walks away with the rest of the bands.   A negative is even if you pay cash, the phone is carrier locked for a year.
    • Apple Stops Allowing Sprint iPhone Activations, Removes Sprint References From Online Store   https://www.macrumors.com/2023/03/23/apple-stops-sprint-activations/
    • After nearly a month T-Mobile seems to be finally expanding n25 beyond the initial 5 sites they were using. However, it seems to be quite the mess. The three sites near me are all using different size channels. I'm getting a 5Mhz channel that's only using the G Block, a 15Mhz channel that's using the C Block, and a 20Mhz channel that's using C+G, each from a different site all next to each other. Very confusing.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...