Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Toledo Market (Toledo, Bowling Green, Findlay, Lima, Port Clition)


keelerman8042

Recommended Posts

Aye you don't gotta get rude bro it was just a question.. Give up then?

2500/2600 is specturm that sprint is deploying their fast lte network on. There is a lot of areas on the this site to help you out more. But it is basically network vision 2.0. It is sprints game changer and with this new 2500/2600 equipment your looking at average speeds of 50/60 mbps per a second. Sadly your iphone 5c cant get it though :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's 2500? Dumb question

what Ryan is trying yo say is most of the info about 2500 is in the premier sponsors section, but 2500 aka band 41 LTE is the frequency which will be cable of 50-70 MBPS and more in the future. Will also help with capacity issues. That'd all I can share right now outside of premiere section.

 

Sent from my LG G2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. I don't follow up with the forum that much because I work so much, so if my question upset some of you sorry. But thanks I really appreciated that my question was answered.

Watch this 3 minute video. Sums up a lot of what is talked about around here in a everyday business talk (not complicated).

If you have more questions feel free to ask in forum or by pm.

 

http://youtu.be/2vVxAHVUvU4

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish they would have started 800 first.

Blame Canada....

Actually for us blame the local emergency people. Now that the all clear has been made and all licence's have been delt with for all of Ohio they will be able to start with 800. If you notice we have Two Rrus on our towers ones for 800 other 1900, go north only one. Likely hood it'll be the later part than sooner but we will have it...and need it.

 

Sent from my LG G2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was on the west side of lima and saw some construction. it looked to me like a house at first but i noticed on the middle of the plot a big slab with huge looking bolts, so i was like HMM turned around and pulled into the drive. turns out a new tower is being put in but on the paperwork hanging it says the job is for verizon. i was like well that blows! sprint could use another tower or 2 around here. but even though the job is for verizon i am wondering if they own the tower itself or another company like "tower something" and could possible allow co locations with AT&T and sprint?

 

The company that listed the information is wirelessestimator.com though they seem to be contractors that build towers they dont seem to list specific information about tower locations/owners

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was on the west side of lima and saw some construction. it looked to me like a house at first but i noticed on the middle of the plot a big slab with huge looking bolts, so i was like HMM turned around and pulled into the drive. turns out a new tower is being put in but on the paperwork hanging it says the job is for verizon. i was like well that blows! sprint could use another tower or 2 around here. but even though the job is for verizon i am wondering if they own the tower itself or another company like "tower something" and could possible allow co locations with AT&T and sprint?

 

The company that listed the information is wirelessestimator.com though they seem to be contractors that build towers they dont seem to list specific information about tower locations/owners

I think if they wanted to they could ask if they can put there equipment and such there if the tower can support it. Tho I know where the tower locations are this is why Sprint plans on having 800 going on voice and LTE. From personal experience idk if it was testing or what but I was getting 800 Voice from a tower from 7 miles away (note this tower is not high and has a lot of different terrain to go through and I was getting -95 to -100 for a signal. If its open its very possible for it to travel 20-30 miles if not more, so once that is done with 800 it will help with coverage. All I can say is Lima does have 6 towers inside the limits of the city.

 

Sent from my LG G2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toledo market has had a lot of sites added the past two years. Per capita, it has to be the most added of any Sprint market.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would like to think that sprint would also add equipment to this tower because myself on sprint and a friend on verizon both get about the same signal on both 3G and 1x.

 

though i dont understand why even verizon would choose to add a tower in this location because its not a deadzone despite the low signal and i have not dropped signal any where around the area in question on sprint. and i have never seen my friends verizon phone even outside of lima drop a signal.

 

 

Its just one of thos thing where you throw your hands up in the air and go  "why"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

at this point i could care less about lte i just want 1x800 so i can make calls. i hooked up to a tower broadcasting 1x800 again but this time i was less than 1 mile from an un upgdaded sprint toweralmost line of sight. once sprint gets 1x800 on all sites verizons coverage will not even compare just due to the fact sprint has more sites due to 1900. just hope they get it done for lima beford the end of the year.

Edited by stuckinohio1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Verizon can add towers left and right cus of $$$ so that's why. Tho Sprint has money now too but why have a bunch of towers and in the long run cost more to operate when you can have fewer and cover more ground. Sprint should already have the RRUs for 1x800 already up and ready to go once its been 3G accepted which it has. It was a lot to do with public safety issues, now that is delt with its just Sprint getting out there to Intergrate (test and do we) with the towers. LTE 800 is a card that they need to put in there in order to have it work if im right, which at this point should also be put in place. Hard telling with Lima you guys are more likely to get LTE 800 than us in Toledo and area if the IBEZ deal is in effect for us. I understand your guys frustration Ryan and I had to deal with it for 3 months of nothing but dropped calls and no data, I my self had to go to TMOs just to get by. Things should looking better tho with this new CEO he sounds like he ant no joke.....heres to hoping by years end that things are good enough to deal with it to a satisfactory level.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i just want 1x800 for talk/text. thats sprints biggest problems out here in the country is lack of service. as far as i can tell 800 will completely cover all areas and even fill black hole spots where we would never get signal at before. at least as far as i can tell 800 mhz out here will be insane because its all flat. and i pick up 1x800 from towers over 11 miles away completely overpowering 1900mhz to the point where i was less than a mile from a tower broadcasting 1900 and my phone refused to switch from 800. my body is ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i just want 1x800 for talk/text. thats sprints biggest problems out here in the country is lack of service. as far as i can tell 800 will completely cover all areas and even fill black hole spots where we would never get signal at before. at least as far as i can tell 800 mhz out here will be insane because its all flat. and i pick up 1x800 from towers over 11 miles away completely overpowering 1900mhz to the point where i was less than a mile from a tower broadcasting 1900 and my phone refused to switch from 800. my body is ready.

800 on both sides will help with coverage and in building penetraten for sure. I agree with you 100% on that i drive around Toledo and go out toward the west like Defience and such and i have issues with coverage on LTE. 800 will Definitely take care of the coverage gaps. Next time you Happen to get 1x800 take a Screen shot of Signalcheck im interested to see where its coming from.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Earlier this year when our 3G was bad in Toledo there was one tower broadcasting 1x800. I was able to get usable signal 10 miles away from the tower. The tower was active for about a week and then I have not connected to it again since (even forcing 1x800 checking).

 

@stuckinohio1:

Do you have signalcheck pro? There is a feature to export logs of connections (pro only?).

It will export on your phone to /root/signalcheck/(date)(cdma/lte)-sites.csv

Could you look through file and find the rows with a 1 in the second to last column and post the address in the last column (Tower address) or attach the file in a pm?

note: file may contain sensitive locations (i.e. home address in form of gps coordinates for safety you could delete everything before provider i.e. "Sprint")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...