Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Northern Jersey Market

hihater

By hihater
in Markets

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

nexgencpu
nexgencpu

Time to wake this thread up from the dead!    Just drove by Jersey City off Palisades ave, and connected to not only Clear B41, but also Sprint B41 8t8r!   There is still one pesky site I drive by

WiWavelength
WiWavelength

"Increased speeds in North Jersey" -- is that what you do in your car because you want to get the hell out of there?     AJ

Joey SR
Joey SR

Got this in englewood at the lukoil on grand ave

Posted Images

nexgencpu Member Level: LTE Advanced

nexgencpu

Posted
Posted

Need to wake up this thread.

 

Sprint finally activated the last site in Jersey City right by the Holland tunnel that attributed to a big LTE gap. Awesome to visit there and no more 3G!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
nexgencpu Member Level: LTE Advanced

nexgencpu

Posted
Posted

To add to the Jersey City conversation, same place where they just upgraded to LTE B25, its now all Sprint B41. Speeds are now AWESOME. Also, due to the lack of high rises, B41 signal travels amazingly well.

 

Speeds were between 25-40mbs..

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
danlodish345 Member Level: LTE Advanced

danlodish345

Posted
Posted

To add to the Jersey City conversation, same place where they just upgraded to LTE B25, its now all Sprint B41. Speeds are now AWESOME. Also, due to the lack of high rises, B41 signal travels amazingly well.

Speeds were between 25-40mbs..

spark deployment is very erratic here and my sis is still 3g....very poor service even though sprint says other wise lol at least 3g is semi useable
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
nexgencpu Member Level: LTE Advanced

nexgencpu

Posted
Posted

Was in Paramus near route 4, had blazing Sprint B41. Also it seemed that the signal traveled fairly well. I have sneaking suspicion I hit some CA sites considering I was hitting 30-40mbs (at -110dbm)with a good amount of folks at the mall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Was in Paramus near route 4, had blazing Sprint B41. Also it seemed that the signal traveled fairly well. I have sneaking suspicion I hit some CA sites considering I was hitting 30-40mbs (at -110dbm)with a good amount of folks at the mall.

 

Oh, were you at Paramus Park?  Was Christina Applegate there?  Was there an impromptu Tiffany concert?

 

https://screen.yahoo.com/christina-applegate-monologue-shopping-sprees-000000292.html

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 6 months later...
nexgencpu Member Level: LTE Advanced

nexgencpu

Posted
Posted

Did see the second carrier? Because 40Mbos doesn't in itself verify CA.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Dave, I'm surprised you would underestimate me like that..LOL. I will post something up if anybody in this thread cares. 

 

Kinda dead here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dkoellerwx Member Level: LTE Advanced

Dkoellerwx

Posted
Posted

Dave, I'm surprised you would underestimate me like that..LOL. I will post something up if anybody in this thread cares.

 

Kinda dead here..

Just making sure! Since the 6P doesn't have a way show a CA connection, there isn't really a way to prove CA other than a 80+ speed test. (Not that I recommend running speed tests all the time! ;) )

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
WillM Member Level: 1x Advanced

WillM

Posted
Posted

so is NV 1.0 still happening in new Jersey?

Who knows? Feels like nothing is happening anywhere in the state to be honest. They badly need more sites too but I doubt that will happen anytime soon if ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nexgencpu Member Level: LTE Advanced

nexgencpu

Posted
Posted

Who knows? Feels like nothing is happening anywhere in the state to be honest. They badly need more sites too but I doubt that will happen anytime soon if ever.

Second carrier just came online in northern NJ and small cell deployment just started happening.

 

So no, work did not stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
danlodish345 Member Level: LTE Advanced

danlodish345

Posted
Posted

Second carrier just came online in northern NJ and small cell deployment just started happening.

 

So no, work did not stop.

Good I can't wait to see the work done :)

 

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WillM Member Level: 1x Advanced

WillM

Posted
Posted

Second carrier just came online in northern NJ and small cell deployment just started happening.

 

So no, work did not stop.

That's good to hear. I just hope it comes to Central Jersey sooner rather than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
danlodish345 Member Level: LTE Advanced

danlodish345

Posted
Posted

Second carrier just came online in northern NJ and small cell deployment just started happening.

 

So no, work did not stop.

Show Network Vision 1.0 and 2.0 and ngn are in progress

 

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deval Member Level: LTE Advanced

Deval

Posted
Posted

Last I checked almost 90% of NV 1.0 sites were complete, so rip and replace appears to have slowed down simply because the bulk of the sites are done.

 

Now it's adding B41 to sites which do not have it, and lighting up the second B41 carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
danlodish345 Member Level: LTE Advanced

danlodish345

Posted
Posted

Last I checked almost 90% of NV 1.0 sites were complete, so rip and replace appears to have slowed down simply because the bulk of the sites are done.

 

Now it's adding B41 to sites which do not have it, and lighting up the second B41 carrier.

I know the Sprint Tower by me doesn't have LTE When likely an issue with the landlord or the township single voice Improvement either there's no SMR except for a couple Towers nope not even close to me

 

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mikejeep · Posted

      It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • mdob07
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mdob07 · Posted

      Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
    • CalebM
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By CalebM · Posted

      Interesting, I saw this too on my AT&T S22 while roaming on US Cellular. I thought it was an Android bug since CellMapper was doing the same thing (didn't get a screenshot of that one). N66 makes more sense than N1. 
    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mikejeep · Posted

      Thanks, that was good timing, I did see your report as I was buttoning up this latest update and added an override for that.. did it not work?   Ok, was that on AT&T also? Please send a report if you happen to see it again and safely have the opportunity. You can always do the long-press on the fly and then send a later one with an explanation pointing to the earlier one.. your username is attached to the long-press reports, so it's not an issue.
    • mdob07
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mdob07 · Posted

      I sent a report in earlier, n66 reporting as n1. There should be two different reports, I couldn't find the button the first time so I just long pressed the connection type to send, then I remembered where it was. I put a note about the issue on the 2nd report. Both reports from me are for the same issue. Also, it might have been on a prior release but earlier this week I also saw n66 reported as n65 on the app. I was driving and wasn't able to send a report in for that one. 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...