Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

Just mapped 4g on tower between old coors all the way up to 86th St. Thats along way for that signal to travel.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

It already showed up. That is quite a way for that signal to go.

 

I can't wait to go to an Isotopes game and being able to use my phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It already showed up. That is quite a way for that signal to go.

 

I can't wait to go to an Isotopes game and being able to use my phone.

same here :D

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I also have had problems connecting to lte in Albuquerque with my n5. My wife was parked on lte and mine on 3g. I would cycle the radio and get lte for one to two seconds then be kicked back down to 3g. Anyone else experience this?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I also have had problems connecting to lte in Albuquerque with my n5. My wife was parked on lte and mine on 3g. I would cycle the radio and get lte for one to two seconds then be kicked back down to 3g. Anyone else experience this?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Yup! :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging by the new stuff mapped in cruces, that must be from the tower on the far west side of town. I'll have to say I'm going to the gym tomorrow and drive all the way over there ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Robert you think El Paso TX will be getting band 26 soon, or will take a while?

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

El Paso is in the IBEZ which means no 800 voice and Band 26 800 LTE for a while. Not soon at all.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

El Paso is in the IBEZ which means no 800 voice and Band 26 800 LTE for a while. Not soon at all.

So pretty much only band 25 for a while while , I was wonder if they are getting 41 any time soon ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So pretty much only band 25 for a while while , I was wonder if they are getting 41 any time soon ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Band 41 is a whole other discussion. I believe El Paso is in the top 100 or close too it. Never know. Since b26 is not readily available, sprint may determine to do b41 earlier than later. That is complete speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Therre has been 2 Caltrop trucks and a white truck with a big lift working on the tower on Golf Course and Irving all day, hope thats a sign of something good. Also, got 90 ping on Golf Course and Southern.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Therre has been 2 Caltrop trucks and a white truck with a big lift working on the tower on Golf Course and Irving all day, hope thats a sign of something good. Also, got 90 ping on Golf Course and Southern.

 

Golf Course and Southern...you may have been on the store DAS system.  There is a Sprint store there at the corner.  Been there many times.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So pretty much only band 25 for a while while , I was wonder if they are getting 41 any time soon ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Band 41 deployment will likely begin in El Paso some time later this year.  El Paso is definitely a Top 100 market and destined to get Band 41 deployments.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got sub 100 pings at Jefferson and 25...always got sh*t in that area, before. The LTE is spreading. Does this have anything to do with Softbank *politely* telling Sprint that the rollout was unacceptably slow? Maybe Sprints execs went to CLs execs and said "ya better get moving, boys, or the katana is going to start swinging!".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got sub 100 pings at Jefferson and 25...always got sh*t in that area, before. The LTE is spreading. Does this have anything to do with Softbank *politely* telling Sprint that the rollout was unacceptably slow? Maybe Sprints execs went to CLs execs and said "ya better get moving, boys, or the katana is going to start swinging!".

That tower in that area was always one of the worst in town, with mega high pings. Either CL finally caught up on their own, or the pressure finally was applied correctly. But either way, it is welcome!

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...