Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

I got lte by before Highway 40 and Atrisco Vista Blvd, also there's a crew working group on a tower at the same intersection ..... I did mapped on sensory :DSent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Im not seeing your mapping. What were speeds like?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not seeing your mapping. What were speeds like?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

It was before that and did t run a speed test , I didn't last too long

 

Maybe was this little bit that's way off from Atrisco Vista Blvd :D

 

de3u7ypu.jpg

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was before that and did t run a speed test , I didn't last too long

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

maybe that's why sensorly didnt map it because it wasnt connected long enough. Im hoping theres a lte signal soon on the west.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe that's why sensorly didnt map it because it wasnt connected long enough. Im hoping theres a lte signal soon on the west.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

Like I said there's a crew working at the tower on Atrisco Vista Blvd and freeway 40 I'll see if a can go take a picture of the tower

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was before that and did t run a speed test , I didn't last too long Maybe was this little bit that's way off from Atrisco Vista Blvd :DSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

that lil bit of purple has been present for a day or so. So I dont think it was from today.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that lil bit of purple has been present for a day or so. So I dont think it was from today.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

so maybe like you said it wasn't long enough that it mapped then

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe that's why sensorly didnt map it because it wasnt connected long enough. Im hoping theres a lte signal soon on the west.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

Agreed! The westside needs some love!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing seeing within a few days much of Albuquerque is covered in LTE. It's also amazing living right in that area. ;) Too bad the time is still off by a few hours leaving me to have to shut off auto time!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im hoping that there will be alot more NV work within the next few months so that we can all have Lte coverage in Albuquerque

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

I can't wait for that b26 love.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@khammondnm What are your mobile network settings? I'm not able for some reason to pick up any LTE no matter where I'm at in the area's that are lighting up. :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@khammondnm What are your mobile network settings? I'm not able for some reason to pick up any LTE no matter where I'm at in the area's that are lighting up. :/

what phone do u have

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@khammondnm What are your mobile network settings? I'm not able for some reason to pick up any LTE no matter where I'm at in the area's that are lighting up. :/

I haven't been to the areas yet, but I was just in Dallas and picked up b25 fine. There is not any b26 here yet.... but it may be on the horizon ;) (premier sponsor info)

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what phone do u have

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

Nexus 5 - 

 

I haven't been to the areas yet, but I was just in Dallas and picked up b25 fine. There is not any b26 here yet.... but it may be on the horizon ;) (premier sponsor info)

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Ah! Good news to hear!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a LTE signal for 2 seconds in cruces. It was a low signal so it might have been some residual signal from El Paso but not likely. I need to drive around after my kids soccer game. Has there been any acceptances in cruces in the last day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a LTE signal for 2 seconds in cruces. It was a low signal so it might have been some residual signal from El Paso but not likely. I need to drive around after my kids soccer game. Has there been any acceptances in cruces in the last day?

 

Nope.  There were no LTE acceptances in ABQ or Cruces on Friday.  I don't expect any more until next week at the earliest.  But some testing signals might be found in the interim.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a LTE signal for 2 seconds in cruces. It was a low signal so it might have been some residual signal from El Paso but not likely. I need to drive around after my kids soccer game. Has there been any acceptances in cruces in the last day?

There is some more on the sensorly map for cruces, looking good for Cruces

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't been home since I noticed the LTE, but it looks like the same tower that was accepted first last time. We will see after I watch 300 with the wife

Sensorly mapped LTE on amador and valley drive, and at university and I-10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured it was a great time to test Sprint's LTE at the Pit, during the PBR Sat. night, and there was no such thing. Amazing service and speed in the parking lot, and then once I entered, BAM nothing and I was kicked to 1x, and then once I worked my way down to the front row seats my father's boss gave me tickets for, I was roaming. Could be all of the rural cowboys that have Sprint all uploading their experience in the city taking up our capacity. ;) Maybe once that B26 comes then we'll get the good stuff!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured it was a great time to test Sprint's LTE at the Pit, during the PBR Sat. night, and there was no such thing. Amazing service and speed in the parking lot, and then once I entered, BAM nothing and I was kicked to 1x, and then once I worked my way down to the front row seats my father's boss gave me tickets for, I was roaming. Could be all of the rural cowboys that have Sprint all uploading their experience in the city taking up our capacity. ;) Maybe once that B26 comes then we'll get the good stuff!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The tower closest to the Pit is not live yet. However, most of the Pit seats are underground. No way Band 25 is going to make it there. I've always struggled with PCS 1X and EVDO there except near the top.

 

Band 26 may make it in there, to some extent. But probably not at the court level. Sprint would need to add DAS. Sprint customers will most likely need to use WiFi at the Pit.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...