Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Columbus Market


abrcrmdl23

Recommended Posts

Figures... i live down the street from that tower and last night Time Warner internet goes down again and i had was my phone.. at 3G,, with an accasional flish of LTE.

Any other strange occurrences? Like flashes of b26 LTE 800 or the second carrier for b25 LTE 1900? Perhaps even 1x800 from further north?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are officially a launched lte martlet as of today!!!

 

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/4glte-launchedmarkets.htm

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SMH. Too early.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why too early?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Gotta use the quote button, but there are too many vital areas left without LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could it be that the majority of the Network is upgrade for them to launch too early?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I understand why they did it, a lot of the city is complete, but, when you have holes like New Albany, Gahanna Shopping Areas, Bexley, Grandview, Livingston/270, Hilliard and East Broad Reynoldsburg, I'd hold my tongue on calling this market launched.

 

Gotta start under promising and over delivering. Hell, I may have held off until LTE 800 at this point.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand Columbus is far from full coverage. But they are quite ahead of 40%. Truth be told, Columbus is being launched with much more coverage than most cities did. Especially back in 2013 when they were mad rushing launches.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand Columbus is far from full coverage. But they are quite ahead of 40%. Truth be told, Columbus is being launched with much more coverage than most cities did. Especially back in 2013 when they were mad rushing launches.

True. Just hope they're not shooting themselves in the foot. Most of the uncovered areas cover most of Columbus' wealthiest residents.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand why they did it, a lot of the city is complete, but, when you have holes like New Albany, Gahanna Shopping Areas, Bexley, Grandview, Livingston/270, Hilliard and East Broad Reynoldsburg, I'd hold my tongue on calling this market launched.

 

Gotta start under promising and over delivering. Hell, I may have held off until LTE 800 at this point.

As long as these areas you mentioned are getting worked on as we speak, i say lay and tweak. Cause I'm still not getting but a glimpse of LTE in my area. 1bar when my phone is idle

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. Just hope they're not shooting themselves in the foot. Most of the uncovered areas cover most of Columbus' wealthiest residents.

I don't know how it is in Columbus, but in my experiences, most of the wealthiest residents use Verizon and won't know they're not covered by Sprint. :hee:

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as these areas you mentioned are getting worked on as we speak, i say lay and tweak. Cause I'm still not getting but a glimpse of LTE in my area. 1bar when my phone is idle

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Only place you're going to get a truthful update on what's still being worked on is here. There is about going on the B26/B41 front.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how it is in Columbus, but in my experiences, most of the wealthiest residents use Verizon and won't know they're not covered by Sprint. :hee:

Yeah, they've probably left a while ago, when smart people did. We're just the locos that stuck it out.
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the iphone6 will support up to 150+megs of LTE. I'm assuming it's Triband

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

It is Triband.  But it will not get to 150Mbps on Sprint, as it does not do carrier aggregation on Band 41.  So it will max out around 90Mbps in the most ideal conditions on the Sprint network.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is Triband. But it will not get to 150Mbps on Sprint, as it does not do carrier aggregation on Band 41. So it will max out around 90Mbps in the most ideal conditions on the Sprint network.

 

Robert

If up to 90mbps isn't enough 4 u, gtho [emoji41]
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SMH. Too early.

Sprint should put close to actual LTE on the maps within a couple of months per LTE site. Launching would then be far less important, thus any decision on it would be far more acceptable
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have 507 Sprint sites including sites acquired through Clear. 371 of those sites currently has some form of LTE. Below is the break of those said sites. I'd also like to point out that 4 of those sites are Sprint Spark sites!

 

 

LTE Bands Accepted by Sites

  • 1.9 - 254
  • 1.9/800 - 64
  • 2.5 - 36
  • 2.5/1.9 - 13
  • 2.5/1.9/800 - 4

Grand Total 371

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...