Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey guys looks like there has been a band 26 sighting in Daytona! It's in the Jax market forum. Yeee Yeee!

Must be north end? I'll be in Holly Hill tomorrow. Definitely hope to find it

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be north end? I'll be in Holly Hill tomorrow. Definitely hope to find it

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

I've been hearing it's for the 500. May be a cow....

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I am back in my corner of the Arctic (5-8 inches of snow today where I live plus blizzard-like winds -- Oh, how I loved getting on that plane yesterday!), a FWIW from my 8-day sojourn in the land of Mickey and the Minions:

 

After good-to-excellent Sprint coverage in the Disney areas and the OC Convention Center during the week, 8 of us went to Universal on Saturday.  4 GS3's and 4 Satan phones (OK, they were iPhone 5c's --sorry if my prejudices sometimes overwhelm me), all fully charged at the beginning of the day.  Sprint coverage virtually everywhere at/near Universal ranged from lousy to non-existent.  Moreover, the GS3's spent their time vainly switching back and forth between mediocre 3G data and even worse 4G LTE as they hunted for coverage, with the result that all 4 GS3 batteries basically died well before the end of the day.  The iPhones had slightly better connectivity and much better battery survival.

 

I live in an area with good Sprint coverage, and I travel all over the western US, and I have never seen the battery problem that the GS3's had at universal on Saturday.  I wonder if Universal has some sort of arrangement with Big Red or The Dark Side (that would be Verizon and AT&T to the less spiteful) which prevents Sprint from placing cells in proximity to the Universal property.

 

I have not read through all 125 preceding pages of this thread, so if I am repeating what 78 other people have already observed, I apologize.  But the situation certainly seemed unusual to me.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I am back in my corner of the Arctic (5-8 inches of snow today where I live plus blizzard-like winds -- Oh, how I loved getting on that plane yesterday!), a FWIW from my 8-day sojourn in the land of Mickey and the Minions:

 

I live in an area with good Sprint coverage, and I travel all over the western US, and I have never seen the battery problem that the GS3's had at universal on Saturday.  I wonder if Universal has some sort of arrangement with Big Red or The Dark Side (that would be Verizon and AT&T to the less spiteful) which prevents Sprint from placing cells in proximity to the Universal property.

 

I have not read through all 125 preceding pages of this thread, so if I am repeating what 78 other people have already observed, I apologize.  But the situation certainly seemed unusual to me.

 

I thought I read Disney had an exclusive thing with the Death Star....Universal I don't know about.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I am back in my corner of the Arctic (5-8 inches of snow today where I live plus blizzard-like winds -- Oh, how I loved getting on that plane yesterday!), a FWIW from my 8-day sojourn in the land of Mickey and the Minions:

 

After good-to-excellent Sprint coverage in the Disney areas and the OC Convention Center during the week, 8 of us went to Universal on Saturday.  4 GS3's and 4 Satan phones (OK, they were iPhone 5c's --sorry if my prejudices sometimes overwhelm me), all fully charged at the beginning of the day.  Sprint coverage virtually everywhere at/near Universal ranged from lousy to non-existent.  Moreover, the GS3's spent their time vainly switching back and forth between mediocre 3G data and even worse 4G LTE as they hunted for coverage, with the result that all 4 GS3 batteries basically died well before the end of the day.  The iPhones had slightly better connectivity and much better battery survival.

 

I live in an area with good Sprint coverage, and I travel all over the western US, and I have never seen the battery problem that the GS3's had at universal on Saturday.  I wonder if Universal has some sort of arrangement with Big Red or The Dark Side (that would be Verizon and AT&T to the less spiteful) which prevents Sprint from placing cells in proximity to the Universal property.

 

I have not read through all 125 preceding pages of this thread, so if I am repeating what 78 other people have already observed, I apologize.  But the situation certainly seemed unusual to me.

 

I was at Universal on Sunday and I felt your pain. Even with band 41 enabled on my Nexus 5 I still was unable to stay on a stable data connection. I was bouncing from b41 to b25 to 3g to roaming and back again. Thank god for wifi in the parks. 

 

Both the towers that are nearest to Universal have not been 4G accepted yet. This is an area that definitely needs some attention considering the troves of people who come through there. I have noticed that one of those towers are on a power line and that there is a trend in this area of sites on power lines are mostly still legacy. Looks like Duke Energy doesn't work very well with equipment deployed on their infrastructure, which is kind of a bummer to see these sites sitting legacy at this point in the NV deployment.

 

Can't say it enough, but C'MON ERICCSON LETS GET 800 IN O-TOWN ALREADY! :)

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Animal kingdom...thought my phone was going to catch fire...in ohio i usually see only 3g and .01mbps so this is quite some change

uploadfromtaptalk1392740686795.jpg

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Animal kingdom...thought my phone was going to catch fire...in ohio i usually see only 3g and .01mbps so this is quite some change

attachicon.gifuploadfromtaptalk1392740686795.jpg

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

You could not had picked a more better week to come to orlando. The weather this week has been absolutely incredible. Makes up for the few weeks of cold and overcast. Also, those speeds are nice! Can't wait until that kind of speed blankets all of Orlando.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could not had picked a more better week to come to orlando. The weather this week has been absolutely incredible. Makes up for the few weeks of cold and overcast. Also, those speeds are nice! Can't wait until that kind of speed blankets all of Orlando.

Yes it's wonderful out..

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could not had picked a more better week to come to orlando. The weather this week has been absolutely incredible. Makes up for the few weeks of cold and overcast. Also, those speeds are nice! Can't wait until that kind of speed blankets all of Orlando.

That's an absolutely beautiful speed test to match the weather we're having today. Must say with LTE being consistent (mind you I had an EvoLte in June when I went) throughout the parks for me back then, it only made me wonder how much better it could get once gaps are filled in the market. When I was in Miami with the s4, I didn't see 3G until cape Canaveral on I-95 coming back home. It was a godsend as far as battery life goes also.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an absolutely beautiful speed test to match the weather we're having today. Must say with LTE being consistent (mind you I had an EvoLte in June when I went) throughout the parks for me back then, it only made me wonder how much better it could get once gaps are filled in the market. When I was in Miami with the s4, I didn't see 3G until cape Canaveral on I-95 coming back home. It was a godsend as far as battery life goes also.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Well, to reach my expectations of Sprints network I need to have LTE almost every single place I go in Orlando/Florida. That means, I want service inside of starbucks, I want service inside of target, inside the movie theater, at the dog park, in my classroom at campus, in my apartment, in winn dixie, public, and everywhere in between. I believe that even though I don't have a triband phone, b26 and b25 will serve me well. Similar spectrum serve AT&T and Verizon customers well so I am hoping for the best with 800 and 1900. It would be nice to get a whole day out of my battery without needing to charge it in the car everywhere I go lol. Or having to connect to wifi everywhere. One day I won't have to say, well at least there is wifi at this (insert location here). Lol

 

Edit: I realize that may be setting my expectations high, but I believe that Sprint can do it. I know they can. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, to reach my expectations of Sprints network I need to have LTE almost every single place I go in Orlando/Florida. That means, I want service inside of starbucks, I want service inside of target, inside the movie theater, at the dog park, in my classroom at campus, in my apartment, in winn dixie, public, and everywhere in between. I believe that even though I don't have a triband phone, b26 and b25 will serve me well. Similar spectrum serve AT&T and Verizon customers well so I am hoping for the best with 800 and 1900. It would be nice to get a whole day out of my battery without needing to charge it in the car everywhere I go lol. Or having to connect to wifi everywhere. One day I won't have to say, well at least there is wifi at this (insert location here). Lol

 

Edit: I realize that may be setting my expectations high, but I believe that Sprint can do it. I know they can. 

 

I wouldn't consider that too high of an expectation at all. Basically said if you have shady 3G at a location you frequent now, you'd expect B26 to more than make up for it down the line in order for you to consider the LTE rollout complete to your liking. I'd 100% agree on the "well at least there's wifi statement" because I find myself saying, "thankfully brighthouse has customer wifi in the area" with some of the stores I frequent.

 

One thing we lacked in initial rollout that Verizon and (don't quote me to this for our market) AT&T had was precious LTE in the 700mhz family to punch through just about anything. That of course came with a price as I've read AT&T is looking at a slough of different bands to beat capacity issues and potentially aggregate (B2, B4, B17, B29, B30). We all know Verizon has been seeding in AWS-1 handsets since this time last year to prioritize users to it's B4 overlay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I am back in my corner of the Arctic (5-8 inches of snow today where I live plus blizzard-like winds -- Oh, how I loved getting on that plane yesterday!), a FWIW from my 8-day sojourn in the land of Mickey and the Minions:

 

After good-to-excellent Sprint coverage in the Disney areas and the OC Convention Center during the week, 8 of us went to Universal on Saturday.  4 GS3's and 4 Satan phones (OK, they were iPhone 5c's --sorry if my prejudices sometimes overwhelm me), all fully charged at the beginning of the day.  Sprint coverage virtually everywhere at/near Universal ranged from lousy to non-existent.  Moreover, the GS3's spent their time vainly switching back and forth between mediocre 3G data and even worse 4G LTE as they hunted for coverage, with the result that all 4 GS3 batteries basically died well before the end of the day.  The iPhones had slightly better connectivity and much better battery survival.

 

I live in an area with good Sprint coverage, and I travel all over the western US, and I have never seen the battery problem that the GS3's had at universal on Saturday.  I wonder if Universal has some sort of arrangement with Big Red or The Dark Side (that would be Verizon and AT&T to the less spiteful) which prevents Sprint from placing cells in proximity to the Universal property.

 

I have not read through all 125 preceding pages of this thread, so if I am repeating what 78 other people have already observed, I apologize.  But the situation certainly seemed unusual to me.

not sure about the empire, but Verizon is pretty bad at Universal as well.  metropcs gets better coverage at Universal than both somehow...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's some work going on at the tower on the north side of UCF. They recently built a new shelter in the back and are now starting to install some new base equipment in it. The tower has had NV antennas and RRU's for about 6 months now but as of today it is still running legacy. Anyone think they could be installing the new base station equipment? I really hope so, I noticed them laying fiber around the site last week as well. 

 

ByjpbYo.jpg?1

 

And notice how the gate is wide open, I was tempted to sneak in lol   :secret:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I am back in my corner of the Arctic (5-8 inches of snow today where I live plus blizzard-like winds -- Oh, how I loved getting on that plane yesterday!), a FWIW from my 8-day sojourn in the land of Mickey and the Minions:

 

After good-to-excellent Sprint coverage in the Disney areas and the OC Convention Center during the week, 8 of us went to Universal on Saturday. 4 GS3's and 4 Satan phones (OK, they were iPhone 5c's --sorry if my prejudices sometimes overwhelm me), all fully charged at the beginning of the day. Sprint coverage virtually everywhere at/near Universal ranged from lousy to non-existent. Moreover, the GS3's spent their time vainly switching back and forth between mediocre 3G data and even worse 4G LTE as they hunted for coverage, with the result that all 4 GS3 batteries basically died well before the end of the day. The iPhones had slightly better connectivity and much better battery survival.

 

I live in an area with good Sprint coverage, and I travel all over the western US, and I have never seen the battery problem that the GS3's had at universal on Saturday. I wonder if Universal has some sort of arrangement with Big Red or The Dark Side (that would be Verizon and AT&T to the less spiteful) which prevents Sprint from placing cells in proximity to the Universal property.

 

I have not read through all 125 preceding pages of this thread, so if I am repeating what 78 other people have already observed, I apologize. But the situation certainly seemed unusual to me.

I work at universal so I know the pain. However, I also know that ATT has two sets of antennas in the park, one at Harry potter, the other on top of Mummy, which is why ATT gets such good coverage in the park. Not sure about Verizon, but rumor had it awhile back that Sprint may put some antennas somewhere in the new Harry potter expansion but I'm not sure as to the credibility of this rumor but if it's true, that's would fill the gap at universal big time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted Image

Daytona hasn't slowed too much with the race fans on LTE1900. Those Cows seem to be doing justice on guarding the network.

Beville and Nova tower.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speed tests for me on B25 have been lackluster the past few weeks. Been pulling 2.3 down and 2.0 up on average, even in good signal coverage areas with multiple accepted towers. I hope Sprint can deploy another 5x5 PCS carrier in Orlando, I'm beginning to think we are having capacity issues. But then again I know we're not a complete market yet! I just hope things get better before they get worse with just the single carrier deployed.

 

Also,

 

Out of curiosity, have there been any 1x800 spotted out in the wild in this market? I saw it once about 8 months ago but since then, nothing..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speed tests for me on B25 have been lackluster the past few weeks. Been pulling 2.3 down and 2.0 up on average, even in good signal coverage areas with multiple accepted towers. I hope Sprint can deploy another 5x5 PCS carrier in Orlando, I'm beginning to think we are having capacity issues. But then again I know we're not a complete market yet! I just hope things get better before they get worse with just the single carrier deployed.

 

Also,

 

Out of curiosity, have there been any 1x800 spotted out in the wild in this market? I saw it once about 8 months ago but since then, nothing..

I know this isn't the exact flavor of 800 you asked about but Jacksonville thread reported LTE 800 in our market. I've used it but jumped back to LTE on 1900. That's off turn one of the Daytona International Speedway (Traffic nightmare again today.)

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this isn't the exact flavor of 800 you asked about but Jacksonville thread reported LTE 800 in our market. I've used it but jumped back to LTE on 1900. That's off turn one of the Daytona International Speedway (Traffic nightmare again today.)

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Ah yeah I heard that. I wish I could flash one of the sponsor PRL's to see if there is anything being tested. I just can't figure out for the life of me how to flash a custom PRL on the Nexus 5 without spending 3 hours doing it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yeah I heard that. I wish I could flash one of the sponsor PRL's to see if there is anything being tested. I just can't figure out for the life of me how to flash a custom PRL on the Nexus 5 without spending 3 hours doing it

I haven't either for the g2. Just now figured out how to change band priority for LTE. Not enough near me to plunder into prl writing just yet though I miss 3G roaming. Was a Godsend when legacy was around here still and the phone was roam happy.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...