Jump to content

Sprint can never win


centermedic

Recommended Posts

I think that if Sprint executes well on its Network Vision plans and starts making money, people's perception of Sprint will change. Until that time, Sprint will have to buckle down and execute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with all facets of life, some people were born to bitch and moan.

True. But it seems as if Sprint is always considered an also ran by folks who do reviews and then when they do include sprint in reviews and comparisons they seem to go out of their way to say something negative while the exact same phone will be on another carrier and they will sing its praises.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with all facets of life, some people were born to bitch and moan.

 

Ain't that the truth!!!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until peoples cell phones work as advertised they will complain. I don't see anything wrong with that.

 

You have to agree that Sprint has been letting their network die a slow death. Only now are they trying to revive it, trying to give it one last chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot of fatalists out there. But when you remove Nextel subscribers from the numbers, Sprint is doing OK and not losing customers. I think most people are in a wait and see mode.

 

There are even millions more who want to switch to Sprint. They are just waiting to see how NV goes. Once entire markets start completing NV, and the "all clear" siren is blasted, people will start coming to Sprint in good numbers. NV is critical to Sprint's survival and future successes.

 

In my personal sphere, I get more and more people than ever before asking me questions about Sprint. Because they are interested in jumping. Some have. Some are waiting a little longer for improvements. Some are just riding out the end of their contracts to switch. I always give them an honest assessment. And some have said, nevermind.

 

However, there are a lot of people starting to root for Sprint. They want Sprint and NV to be successful. They want another viable option. And Sprint has a great opportunity. They need to continue with NV at full throttle, they need to keep the device lineup of awesome devices moving and they need to keep pushing the unlimited differentiation.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we look at this in a very narrow scope (network performance).

 

If you look at Sprint's voluntary churn (more practically total churn) - you will see that overall, people are pretty satisfied with Sprint. Do they have churn metrics like Verizon? No - but it is an improving story.

 

The number one cause of voluntary churn, or people leaving Sprint voluntary, was, according to Dan Hesse, no iPhone. Once they got the iPhone Sprint actually had more people port in from other carriers than port out - even with the sub-par data speeds.

 

So the way I look at it is - if the majority of Sprint customers are ok with the network speeds now, wait until network vision is done and I think we will see churn continue to go down (increased satisfaction).

 

If you look at what sprint has done (improve customer service, improve handset selection, now improve the network), it's trending in the right direction.

 

I think one of the last things they need to work on is improve their Information Technology department. Their antiquated customer service tools (billing for example) really need to be updated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we look at this in a very narrow scope (network performance).

 

If you look at Sprint's voluntary churn (more practically total churn) - you will see that overall' date=' people are pretty satisfied with Sprint. Do they have churn metrics like Verizon? No - but it is an improving story.

 

The number one cause of voluntary churn, or people leaving Sprint voluntary, was, according to Dan Hesse, no iPhone. Once they got the iPhone Sprint actually had more people port in from other carriers than port out - even with the sub-par data speeds.

 

So the way I look at it is - if the majority of Sprint customers are ok with the network speeds now, wait until network vision is done and I think we will see churn continue to go down (increased satisfaction).

 

If you look at what sprint has done (improve customer service, improve handset selection, now improve the network), it's trending in the right direction.

 

I think one of the last things they need to work on is improve their Information Technology department. Their antiquated customer service tools (billing for example) really need to be updated.[/quote']

 

What's wrong with their billing?

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What's wrong with their billing?

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

 

Nothing that I know of, they upgraded the support and billing systems after the Nextel purchase.

 

Remember the horror stories of people being on two different billing systems?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing that I know of, they upgraded the support and billing systems after the Nextel purchase.

 

Remember the horror stories of people being on two different billing systems?

 

Business customers are still on a different billing system. My bills design is totally different from my friends business bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot of fatalists out there. But when you remove Nextel subscribers from the numbers' date=' Sprint is doing OK and not losing customers. I think most people are in a wait and see mode.

 

There are even millions more who want to switch to Sprint. They are just waiting to see how NV goes. Once entire markets start completing NV, and the "all clear" siren is blasted, people will start coming to Sprint in good numbers. NV is critical to Sprint's survival and future successes.

 

In my personal sphere, I get more and more people than ever before asking me questions about Sprint. Because they are interested in jumping. Some have. Some are waiting a little longer for improvements. Some are just riding out the end of their contracts to switch. I always give them an honest assessment. And some have said, nevermind.

 

However, there are a lot of people starting to root for Sprint. They want Sprint and NV to be successful. They want another viable option. And Sprint has a great opportunity. They need to continue with NV at full throttle, they need to keep the device lineup of awesome devices moving and they need to keep pushing the unlimited differentiation.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner[/quote']

 

Right on. There are people here who have asked me about unlimited data. As rural sprint coverage is non existant here, many of them end up " not an option" at the end of the convo.... but still, the growth potential of their current offering is incredible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still rooting for them. I hope to be able to give them another look in a few years. Until then, I just can't justify paying them for nothing. Yesterday, all day long, I didn't manage one speedtest over 78kbps. Average was around 40kbps.

I don't even bother complaining or calling them anymore. Just not worth the headache.

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get EDGE like speeds in many areas and about double that in most. It's enough to stream pandora, check the news, post here and other things. Would I like to have faster speeds to be able to stream video? Absolutely!

 

However, with Sprint's revolutionary family plans which include shared Unlimited Data, they can't be beat for my family. We are a six person family that all wanted smart phones and a bill that wasn't sky high, so for us Sprint is the ONLY option (save US Cellular but we had a bad customer service experience with them).

 

This pretty much sums up how my Sprint data experience is right now though.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCeGCSvueM8&feature=related

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...