Jump to content

S4GRU Teaser Discussion


Sgt. Slaughter

Recommended Posts

I sure hope that Sprint can start putting 800LTE in their phones by this fall.

 

I think that is a stretch really...given their slides that they showed at the RCA event recently it looked like 800 LTE was not being looked at till 2014....

 

Now Clear will have 5K sites up by next June so it might make sense to include the 2.5 before the 800...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ and I know when 800LTE is going live. ;)

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

 

Now why would you be such a tease? Give us something, please?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ and I know when 800LTE is going live. ;)

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

 

While I dont doubt the intel, it'd be tough to go against the 2014 note they made for it at the RCA presentation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

While I dont doubt the intel' date=' it'd be tough to go against the 2014 note they made for it at the RCA presentation...[/quote']

 

They never said that 800LTE will not be available until 2014. You are reading more into what was said.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They never said that 800LTE will not be available until 2014. You are reading more into what was said.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

 

 

actually im not reading more into what he said...

http://www.livestream.com/rcrtv/video?clipId=pla_b1b6ff3f-81e2-4e20-96d8-173f62be9745&utm_source=lslibrary&utm_medium=ui-thumb

 

18min mark...."...and I did mention were going to LTE 800 out in a 2014..."

 

Seems pretty clear there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually im not reading more into what he said...

http://www.livestrea...medium=ui-thumb

 

18min mark...."...and I did mention were going to LTE 800 out in a 2014..."

 

Seems pretty clear there...

 

Seemed like an afterthought when I watched it. Like he wasn't planning on mentioning it, but it was on the slide so he said it. Not to mention, it could be "complete" by 2014, but starting as soon as the iDEN is decommissioned and network vision is installed in an area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seemed like an afterthought when I watched it. Like he wasn't planning on mentioning it, but it was on the slide so he said it. Not to mention, it could be "complete" by 2014, but starting as soon as the iDEN is decommissioned and network vision is installed in an area.

 

doubt its talk of complete as they say they are "going LTE this year" and it wont be complete this year...just a few places...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can tell you it is happening before 2014. And we are going to write detailed articles about it.

 

I will listen to the audio when I get home from church. And then I will PM you something real Sarge. My documents are better than anything Sprint says. Because my documents show what Sprint is saying to each other, not what they mention to the public.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ and I know when 800LTE is going live. ;)

 

Robert and I also know when Sprint plans to deploy a second 5 MHz x 5 MHz LTE carrier in PCS A-F block spectrum and to roll out handsets with removable SIMs...

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Robert and I also know when Sprint plans to deploy a second 5 MHz x 5 MHz LTE carrier in PCS A-F block spectrum and to roll out handsets with removable SIMs...

 

AJ

 

No offense but its posts like these that really are not needed...it'd honestly be better to say nothing at all until there is an article written on it....or to say at most something along the lines of "...sprint is planning on deploying X at some time unknown."...

 

The way things are worded come off as tooting ur horns there...if your not going to explain...then best to not mention really.

 

You both know I have a ton of respect for yall but I feel strongly that info like this should either be left for article only.

At the very least not be mentioned in this manner...

 

Itd be like me saying I know when ICS is dropping for X device but not saying so...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense but its posts like these that really are not needed...it'd honestly be better to say nothing at all until there is an article written on it....or to say at most something along the lines of "...sprint is planning on deploying X at some time unknown."...

 

The way things are worded come off as tooting ur horns there...if your not going to explain...then best to not mention really.

 

You both know I have a ton of respect for yall but I feel strongly that info like this should either be left for article only.

At the very least not be mentioned in this manner...

 

Itd be like me saying I know when ICS is dropping for X device but not saying so...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

I have a feeling 95% of our readers disagree with you. We are telling you a little advanced information about articles we are planning and you are telling us you can't handle it??? You'd prefer to know nothing until we are ready to tell everything?

 

Robert

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have a feeling 95% of our readers disagree with you. We are telling you a little advanced information about articles we are planning and you are telling us you can't handle it??? You'd prefer to know nothing until we are ready to tell everything?

 

Robert

 

Just saying for a forum that's growing like this It's beat to hold cards to chest till your ready to discuss...

 

Bc when you say things and don't discuss it will cause friction. Seen it happen in many different forums all the time and it always ends the same way with users getting frustrated.

 

Too each their own but i still disagree fully and it has nothing to do with me being able to handle it.

 

It's more about how it was worded than anything else.

 

Like say "look for an article on X in near future too..." Or something like I said before....

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saying for a forum that's growing like this It's beat to hold cards to chest till your ready to discuss...

 

Bc when you say things and don't discuss it will cause friction. Seen it happen in many different forums all the time and it always ends the same way with users getting frustrated.

 

Too each their own but i still disagree fully and it has nothing to do with me being able to handle it.

 

It's more about how it was worded than anything else.

 

Like say "look for an article on X in near future too..." Or something like I said before....

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

You have instances where site owners who have forums give some advanced information and it causes friction? I am providing information. In my format. Take it or leave it. I'm starting to get a little pissed.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You have instances where site owners who have forums give some advanced information and it causes friction? I am providing information. In my format. Take it or leave it. I'm starting to get a little pissed.

 

Robert

 

Took to PM...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need for anyone to get angry. I have a few rational thoughts to offer on both sides of the equation. But give me 30 minutes or so to formulate them.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need for anyone to get angry. I have a few rational thoughts to offer on both sides of the equation. But give me 30 minutes or so to formulate them.

 

AJ

 

Not angry in the slightest. Took our lil chit chat to PM where it belonged in the first place. My fault completely as that's what i shoulda done to begin with anyway instead of posting in public like i did.

Again my fault on that.

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree with the Sarge. You have this information you are lording over our heads like we're not worthy. Best not to mention it maybe until your ready to talk about it. Just sayin' it might keep the masses at bay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some information just isn't ready to be released. For as busy as our Admin and Authors are, it takes time to finish compiling all this information before it can be released. We just have to be patient and take the hints as something good so we can have the positive anticipation of what is coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...