Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I think the most surprising thing that I've found when going back to look [emoji102] at T-Mobile customer numbers was that their ABPU is 7% lower than Sprint, their ARPU is 17% lower than Sprint's, and their postpaid phone numbers went up through the entirety of Uncarrier from 20 million to 32 million. That's barely more than Sprint. The largest engine of their growth has been prepaid.

 

Sprint would be in a better position if not for the past bad debt and bad decisions.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Yet Sprint's operating income is $310M, while T-Mobile's is $3.8B. Those numbers, IIRC, wouldn't be affected by debt repayment or taxes, only net income would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet Sprint's operating income is $310M, while T-Mobile's is $3.8B. Those numbers, IIRC, wouldn't be affected by debt repayment or taxes, only net income would be.

It is intriguing to see where the numbers lead in things like this. That said, the mass of Verizon customers in the consumer end is staggering. Verizon has 100+ million postpaid lines and 72% of it is consumer. That's 72 million lines held by consumers. Verizon is doing unlimited IMO because that 72 million was starting to get chipped away.

 

To contrast, AT&T sits at million 27 consumer lines and the rest is business mobility, 50 million lines.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This simple phrase can't be stressed enough. People are conditioned to view higher numbers as better certainly, but 'more' is not unequivocally better in every possible situation/scenario.

A10 has just as many cores as Kyro but kills it in performance especially on single core.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So LTE-U interesting.

 

Seems again TMO is talking less and doing more.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's an exciting time for LTE if you're with T-Mobile, they never seem to miss a beat. VZ and AT&T are trying stuff, but they're too fixated on 5G right now to pump more out of what they currently have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet Sprint's operating income is $310M, while T-Mobile's is $3.8B. Those numbers, IIRC, wouldn't be affected by debt repayment or taxes, only net income would be.

Tmobile operating income for the last quarter is not 3.8 B or any quarter in the company's history.  Leave your financial numbers analysis to those who know.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tmobile operating income for the last quarter is not 3.8 B or any quarter in the company's history. Leave your financial numbers analysis to those who know.

I didn't say quarter, I didn't say anything. It was for the entire year, so don't assume I don't know how to google and read English.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an exciting time for LTE if you're with T-Mobile, they never seem to miss a beat. VZ and AT&T are trying stuff, but they're too fixated on 5G right now to pump more out of what they currently have.

 

I find it funny when Tmobile trying to make people think their coverage is AS good as Verizon or AT&T.  Let's be real. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say quarter, I didn't say anything. It was for the entire year, so don't assume I don't know how to google and read English.

Read your English again, you are comparing Sprint's one quarter to Tmo's ENTIRE year.  Again, leave it to the pros. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So LTE-U interesting.

 

Seems again TMO is talking less and doing more.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Per Sherif Hanna of Qualcomm, this is only going to be deployed in small cells for the conceivable future. T-Mobile only has 1000 of those in the field, a far smaller number than either Verizon or Sprint. T-Mobile has to ramp up small cell deployment for LTE-U to be seen much. There's another 7000 small cells contracted but we all know the delays that pop up in the small cell process.

 

Also it will only be supported by X16 devices initially. Perhaps XMM 7560 later in the year. That means only GS8 since X16 is likely limited to Snapdragon 835 which is limited to GS8 initially.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's annual income statement posted in March 2016:

http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/s/financials?query=income-statement

You are terrible at this.  You are comparing March 2016 (Sprint) data to December 2016 (Tmobile) data. 

 

I am going to stop responding to you until you know how bad you are at this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are terrible at this. You are comparing March 2016 (Sprint) data to December 2016 (Tmobile) data.

 

I am going to stop responding to you until you know how bad you are at this.

Have you ever heard of reporting financial statements at the end of the FISCAL year? Which ends in MARCH?

The only one who has no idea WHAT they're talking about is you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you ever heard of reporting financial statements at the end of the FISCAL year? Which ends in MARCH?

The only one who has no idea WHAT they're talking about is you.

Sprint's fiscal year has not ended as of December 2016, Mr. Smart. Tmobile has as of December 2016.  

 

Add up the last 4 quarters of Sprint's data from January to December 2016 if you want to compare apples to apples. You pull the data on march 2016 (Sprint's last completed) fiscal year and tell me Tmo completed fiscal year number dated Dec. 2016. 

 

Why am I wasting my time! I wonder sometimes why we rank at the bottom of the chart in STEM for developed nations.  I am experiencing it first hand today. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's fiscal year has not ended as of December 2016, Mr. Smart. Tmobile has as of December 2016.

 

Add up the last 4 quarters of Sprint's data from January to December 2016 if you want to compare apples to apples. You pull the data on march 2016 (Sprint's last completed) fiscal year and tell me Tmo completed fiscal year number dated Dec. 2016.

 

Why am I wasting my time! I wonder sometimes why we rank at the bottom of the chart in STEM for developed nations. I am experiencing it first hand today. LOL

Okay then Sprint's operating income is $310M for the 2015 fiscal year, NOT THE QUARTER when you were blatantly WRONG, and T-Mobile's was $2B for the year of 2015. I was wrong on T-Mobile's number but I didn't come out swinging based on the assumption that I was posting a quarterly result. You acted like you're superior and more educated, and you're still wrong on your assumption. And you know what they say about people who assume, so do us both a favor and stop talking.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are terrible at this.  You are comparing March 2016 (Sprint) data to December 2016 (Tmobile) data. 

 

I am going to stop responding to you until you know how bad you are at this.

 

Have you ever heard of reporting financial statements at the end of the FISCAL year? Which ends in MARCH?

The only one who has no idea WHAT they're talking about is you.

 

AJ

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of you two knock it off right now. Neither of you is completely right here, but one is way more on the right track than the other.

Have you ever heard of reporting financial statements at the end of the FISCAL year? Which ends in MARCH?
The only one who has no idea WHAT they're talking about is you.

Comparing T-Mobile's 2016 to Sprint's 2015 isn't an apples to apples comparison as you've only got one quarter that actually overlaps (T-Mobile's 1st Quarter for 2016 and Sprint's 4th Q for 2015). What you need to do when two companies have different fiscal years is something to normalize the reporting period you are looking at. With T-Mobile's year ending on a more traditional 12-31, and especially with that being the most recent reporting quarter for both companies, something much more appropriate to do would be to take Sprint's trailing-twelve-months (TTM). That is much more of an apples to apples comparison than soon to be year old data versus data concluding 2 months ago.

Okay then Sprint's operating income is $310M for the 2015 fiscal year, NOT THE QUARTER when you were blatantly WRONG

It was $311 million for the latest quarter though hence his confusion. To him, you were either comparing Sprint's quarter ending 12-31 (their 3rd) to T-Mobile's entire year ending 12-31 (2016) or you were comparing Sprint's 2015 fiscal year operating income ($310 million) to T-Mobile's 2016. Neither looks great on an apples to apples scale...

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-and-ericsson-to-demonstrate-live-high-speed-gigabit-class-data-speeds-over-lte-tdd.htm

 

This gigabit speed -- does sprint need to update the towers or everything is ready to go, except for backhaul?

How would 256 QAM even be possible on Clearwire equipment? I don't think I've seen a SNR of more than 10 dB unless I'm staring at the cell tower.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The iPhone was dual core until last year, and the iPhone 7 is quad core but only uses 2 cores at a time depending on whether you need high performance or battery efficiency. More cores does not always mean better performance, otherwise AMD would be everyone's go to. It's all about instructions per cycle efficiency, and that's something Apple & Snapdragon have really mastered.

is that why the iphone usually has better battery life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would 256 QAM even be possible on Clearwire equipment? I don't think I've seen a SNR of more than 10 dB unless I'm staring at the cell tower.

 

My SNR right now is 27.0db on a -94dbm Band 25 signal. For some reason SNR is super high is Boston when compared to NYC. Perhaps it's due to the high density of sites there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...