Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Upstate New York Markets - Central & East (including Syracuse, Albany, Binghamton, Ithaca, Utica)


bstrignano

Recommended Posts

Things looking good in UNY. I just had a 121 MB download in Glens Falls NY with my XS Max. I’ve also noticed the TMO roaming helping fill the gaps too. I’ve found my phone roaming to B2 & 12 on CA. 2nd pic is circled TMO speed test. 09c2eef486442c4f938627385511cf48.jpgebcbb6400aa09d3ac79c6881476bcb99.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

A lot of rebuilds with B41 and B25/26 or just B25/26 on NY17 between Roscoe and Monticello. Previously these were all B25 only GMO site. Still a lot of coverage gaps between sites where I would drop Sprint LTE or hold on to B26 until -130dBm. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noticed hugely improved coverage along 17 a few weeks ago. Hopefully once B26 is tuned it'll be solid the whole way through. 

Anyone know if I-88 is solid from Binghamton to Albany yet? There were still a bunch of LTE --> 3G drops a few months ago when I checked. This should have been solid LTE years ago. :(

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2019 at 3:33 PM, burnout8488 said:

Noticed hugely improved coverage along 17 a few weeks ago. Hopefully once B26 is tuned it'll be solid the whole way through. 

Anyone know if I-88 is solid from Binghamton to Albany yet? There were still a bunch of LTE --> 3G drops a few months ago when I checked. This should have been solid LTE years ago. :(

According to cellmapper uploads, it looks like I-88 coverage has improved a lot since last year. The trouble spots seem to be the six or so sites where they are strictly B25 and have hills and/or dense forest blocking the signal. Some rural sites got B41 along with B26 added to them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention that the COLT or COW with Saltilite backhaul wasn't in Walton when I returned a few weeks ago. T-mobile roaming was in full effect although it seemed like it was only B12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • 2 years later...

Reviving another thread!

I went up to Hudson, NY this weekend and tested T-Mobile and Verizon's networks while there. Most of the urbanized area of Hudson is served by a single site on top of Columbia Memorial Hospital that nearly every carrier is collocated on. Verizon's site at the hospital is broadcasting Band 2/5/13/66 and no 5G at all. T-Mobile's is broadcasting Band 2/12/41/66/71 and n41/71. 

Coverage on both carriers is roughly the same but speeds are leaps and bounds better on T-Mobile. If I had to take I guess, I think that this due to a combination of T-Mobile having more spectrum deployed and simply having fewer customers in the region. In equal conditions along Warren St (Hudson's Main Street) I was seeing average speeds of ~350Mbps on T-Mobile and on Verizon I was seeing ~60Mbps on average. In normal usage, I couldn't tell a difference between 60Mbps and 350Mbps on my phones.

While in Hudson, I stayed at The Wick Hotel (I highly recommend it if you visit) which is located pretty much as far as you can get away from the city's main cell site while staying in Hudson. It's near the waterfront and just across the street from the Hudson Amtrak Station.

In my hotel room the difference in the networks was a lot more noticeable. My T-Mobile line no longer connected to 5G. Instead it flipped between 5MHz of Band 12 and 5MHz of Band 71. On Verizon I was only able to get 10MHz of Band 13. During the day, the Verizon's Band 13 carrier could barely get over 1Mbps on the 1-2 bars of LTE I was seeing in my room. T-Mobile on the other hand was getting a consistent 12Mbps on both Band 12 and Band 71 with similar signal strength to Verizon. I also tested at 3AM to see the difference in speeds when the network is barely in use. This was the only time during my trip where Verizon outperformed T-Mobile. With those same 1-2 bars at 3AM I managed to get 54Mbps on Verizon and on T-Mobile I was only able to get up to 27Mbps. It seems like this difference in speed can mostly be attributed to the difference in carrier size as opposed to capacity.

Sidenote: One thing I noticed in Hudson is that I often had a stronger signal on n41 than I did on Band 66. When I checked FieldTestMode I’d see something like Band 66 at -112dbm while n41 was at -106dbm. Goes to show how good n41's propagation can be in areas where they can just increase power to the max.

— — — — —

I also went for lunch at Frank Guido's Port of Call in Catskill, NY. Neither Verizon nor T-Mobile have 5G in Catskill. There, T-Mobile outperformed Verizon once again. Verizon's network was completely unusable in the restaurant. I couldn't load any social media or place a call and I was barely able to send a text out on the 1 bar of Band 13 I was seeing. I was unable to even run a speed test on Verizon as it failed every single time. My T-Mobile line on the other hand bounced between 1-2 bars of Band 12, enough to give me about 3Mbps down and 1Mbps up.

— — — — —

Purple and red markers are where the T-Mobile/Verizon site is located, the blue marker is where The Wick Hotel is, and the red line is Warren St. It seems like coverage is optimized on both carriers to cover Warren Street as best as they can.

ET4LlYF.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...