Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Hawaii Market (including Honolulu, Oahu and all Hawaiian Islands)


markjcc

Recommended Posts

Got eHRPD 13

Last night Honolulu.

 

Speed is about 1280-1600 down and 200-240 up.

Versus evdo which was 80-150 at thw most.

 

Can confirm that I am seeing ehrpd also in Aiea. Speeds are still slow here though (125kbps).

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Can confirm that I am seeing ehrpd also in Aiea. Speeds are still slow here though (125kbps).

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

 

Had good speed till an hour ago. Its flipping between 1rxtt and ehrpd at Waipio.

Maybe congested or they are adjusting the network?

 

This used to happen when it was evdo, after a few days of flipping it went to ehrpd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ehrpd is not an indication of LTE. In some markets, ehrpd was turned on months in advance before NV upgrades even began. All ehrpd is, is that of a software update to allow easy transitions between LTE and EVDO 3g. Absolutely nothing has changed until you get very high 3g speeds of 1.5-2.0+ DL / 1.0 UL all day, every day or LTE popping up. Old T1 backhaul to legacy towers slow down when there's a heavy load on the tower while Fiber / MW / AAV does not.

 

More you know!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ehrpd is not an indication of LTE. In some markets, ehrpd was turned on months in advance before NV upgrades even began. All ehrpd is, is that of a software update to allow easy transitions between LTE and EVDO 3g. Absolutely nothing has changed until you get very high 3g speeds of 1.5-2.0+ DL / 1.0 UL all day, every day or LTE popping up. Old T1 backhaul to legacy towers slow down when there's a heavy load on the tower while Fiber / MW / AAV does not.

 

More you know!

 

Thanks for the information

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As of yesterday ehprd was not

Live. EVDO rev. A was live. I tried toggling airplane mode, rebooting

Phone. Nothing brought back ehrpd.

I hope this doesn't mean we are taking a step backwards for NV?

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of yesterday ehprd was not

Live. EVDO rev. A was live. I tried toggling airplane mode, rebooting

Phone. Nothing brought back ehrpd.

I hope this doesn't mean we are taking a step backwards for NV?

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

 

No. It is not a sign at all. This happens in all markets from time to time. It may be a sign they are doing work on the Hawaiian LTE core.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 on Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No. It is not a sign at all. This happens in all markets from time to time. It may be a sign they are doing work on the Hawaiian LTE core.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 on Tapatalk

Wheew... I guess that is good news yay!

Thanks Robert for the information!

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert all day yesterday it was only 1x-RTT.Super slow connection all day at work on my co workers phone in Waikiki. Or pretty muchSmack dab in Honolulu. Tried toggling airplane mode, Data on/off, rebooted phone This is the same place I have seen Ehrpd and EVDO rev a on the Evo 4g lte days earlier. Any thoughts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw On the way home my

Og Evo on 3g had some speeds

Of 2mb down and 8kb up.

About 10 miles from work

Strange?

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

 

Look at sponsor maps and locate the nearest cell site locations to where you were and go check if anything is going on. Best way to find out as you're the one in the neighborhood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
the sign of ehprd

is the sign on LTE coming

sadly they deploy first in Honolulu then Maui the big island and so on

 

Heres the Article on Sprint Network Vision in Hawaii

http://newsroom.sprint.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=2120

 

Markjcc,

I read this article long time ago in the star advertiser.

I don't see any lte or ehrpd

Information in that article.

However, on the Sprint community

Forum, there is a member who

Claims to have had the 4g lte

Icon light up momentarily on

His sprint lte phone. He was on Oahu.

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Markjcc,

I read this article long time ago in the star advertiser.

I don't see any lte or ehrpd

Information in that article.

However, on the Sprint community

Forum, there is a member who

Claims to have had the 4g lte

Icon light up momentarily on

His sprint lte phone. He was on Oahu.

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

 

I don't believe this poster you read for a second. Hawaii is an Alcatel Lucent market. AlcaLu is notorious for doing 3G for the first 3-4 months in a market before the first LTE site goes live. And there have been no 3G waited accepted to date in Hawaii. I wouldn't expect anything to start in Hawaii for a few more months.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't believe this poster you read for a second. Hawaii is an Alcatel Lucent market. AlcaLu is notorious for doing 3G for the first 3-4 months in a market before the first LTE site goes live. And there have been no 3G waited accepted to date in Hawaii. I wouldn't expect anything to start in Hawaii for a few more months.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Robert,

When you say working on 3G first?

Do you mean upgrading the

Backhaul to fiber from T1?

And what do you mean by 3G acceptance?

 

Why I state this?

If you check

on the network updates per

Sprint's network site. There

Has been almost 70 upgrades in the

Last 6 months according to Sprint.

 

Majority of the upgrades were of the the data speeds and capacity nature.

 

I know that NV and the (data speed/capacity) updates per Sprint's

Site are not the same entirely.

 

What will the Nv upgrades

Show up like on Sprint's

Network updates site?

 

Also,

 

So after this 3G acceptance

Is so to say granted?

What will be the next step?

 

Thanks.

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Robert' date='

When you say working on 3G first?

Do you mean upgrading the

Backhaul to fiber from T1?

And what do you mean by 3G acceptance?

 

Why I state this?

If you check

on the network updates per

Sprint's network site. There

Has been almost 70 upgrades in the

Last 6 months according to Sprint.

 

Majority of the upgrades were of the the data speeds and capacity nature.

 

I know that NV and the (data speed/capacity) updates per Sprint's

Site are not the same entirely.

 

What will the Nv upgrades

Show up like on Sprint's

Network updates site?

 

Also,

 

So after this 3G acceptance

Is so to say granted?

What will be the next step?

 

Thanks.

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless[/quote']

 

 

On the NV Sites Complete maps they show 3G sites completed. This is what I was referring to. On our maps, if a site is shown as 3G complete, it means that all the new 3G Network Vision hardware has been installed and accepted as complete. AlcuLu markets tend to only have the 3G side of their NV sites be completed in the beginning, with LTE not coming live on those sites until 2-5 months later. It's just the way AlcaLu has done it in most of their markets.

 

As for network.sprint.com, it shows legacy network maintenance upgrades and Network Vision upgrades. However, NV upgrades only show on sites after they have been completed and accepted. Since NV has not started in Hawaii, all the data speed upgrades you see are additional T1 lines to legacy sites. There is no way to discern NV upgrades from legacy upgrades. S4GRU NV Sites Complete maps are the place to find out which sites have been converted to NV.

 

To help you understand, a data speed upgrade means additional backhaul has been added. Data capacity means another 3G EVDO carrier has been added. And a voice capacity is an additional 1xRTT voice carrier has been added.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Robert,

When you say working on 3G first?

Do you mean upgrading the

Backhaul to fiber from T1?

And what do you mean by 3G acceptance?

 

Why I state this?

If you check

on the network updates per

Sprint's network site. There

Has been almost 70 upgrades in the

Last 6 months according to Sprint.

 

Majority of the upgrades were of the the data speeds and capacity nature.

 

I know that NV and the (data speed/capacity) updates per Sprint's

Site are not the same entirely.

 

What will the Nv upgrades

Show up like on Sprint's

Network updates site?

 

Also,

 

So after this 3G acceptance

Is so to say granted?

What will be the next step?

 

Thanks.

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

 

Is this a poem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And to add to Robert's post, I wouldn't be surprised if Hawaii doesn't start NV/LTE upgrades there for another year or so. It took Sprint forever to bring in Wimax and 3G EvDO to the islands. Hawaii is usually the last to get anything usually because of cost and the massive amount of red tape. Just look at the amount of protest there is when a mainland company wants to try build anything there (Best Buy, Target, etc). Oahu seems to be more progressive than Maui, BI, etc. so I can definitely see them getting the upgrades first before any other island. I'm not trying to sound harsh, it's just reality.

 

Sent from my Rooted Sony Tablet S using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And to add to Robert's post, I wouldn't be surprised if Hawaii doesn't start NV/LTE upgrades there for another year or so. It took Sprint forever to bring in Wimax and 3G EvDO to the islands. Hawaii is usually the last to get anything usually because of cost and the massive amount of red tape. Just look at the amount of protest there is when a mainland company wants to try build anything there (Best Buy, Target, etc). Oahu seems to be more progressive than Maui, BI, etc. so I can definitely see them getting the upgrades first before any other island. I'm not trying to sound harsh, it's just reality.

 

Sent from my Rooted Sony Tablet S using Forum Runner

 

Actually, from launch day

June 2010 my og Evo had wimax.

Honolulu was a first launch city

In terms of Wimax.

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Actually, from launch day

June 2010 my og Evo had wimax.

Honolulu was a first launch city

In terms of Wimax.

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

 

Right, Oahu (Honolulu market) is usually the first island to begin upgrades, etc, but Summer 2010 to finally bring in Wimax just to Honolulu after its been on the mainland years before it is way behind. Plus by then, Wimax was already starting to wind down. Like I said before, I won't be surprised if it takes a year or more to finally get things started.

 

Sent from my Rooted Sony Tablet S using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Actually, from launch day

June 2010 my og Evo had wimax.

Honolulu was a first launch city

In terms of Wimax.

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

 

Is this red tape you speak of on Sprint's end?

 

Because Honolulu was an At&t

Early LTE market. We've had At&t

LTE since last August/Sept.

 

And for Verizon? LTE went live in Honolulu in July of 2011. About 6

Months after initial launch

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Right, Oahu (Honolulu market) is usually the first island to begin upgrades, etc, but Summer 2010 to finally bring in Wimax just to Honolulu after its been on the mainland years before it is way behind. Plus by then, Wimax was already starting to wind down. Like I said before, I won't be surprised if it takes a year or more to finally get things started.

 

Sent from my Rooted Sony Tablet S using Tapatalk HD

 

WiMax was on the mainland "years" before 2010? Am I missing something?

 

Also, in my opinion, anyone in a wimax area should be instabanned for complaining that they don't have LTE yet...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Right, Oahu (Honolulu market) is usually the first island to begin upgrades, etc, but Summer 2010 to finally bring in Wimax just to Honolulu after its been on the mainland years before it is way behind. Plus by then, Wimax was already starting to wind down. Like I said before, I won't be surprised if it takes a year or more to finally get things started.

 

Sent from my Rooted Sony Tablet S using Tapatalk HD

 

Virtualbot,

Are you speaking about wimax

With sprint or through Clear wireless?

Because, yes I agree if you were referring wimax through Sprint.

 

I do know though.... We had clear

Wireless 4g(wimax) for some time before the Evo4g came out for Sprint.

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

WiMax was on the mainland "years" before 2010? Am I missing something?

 

Also, in my opinion, anyone in a wimax area should be instabanned for complaining that they don't have LTE yet...

 

I meant the other islands got Wimax toward the end. Was thinking of one thing and typing out another.

 

Sent from my Rooted Sony Tablet S using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virtualbot, on 15 January 2013 - 12:42 PM, said:

 

Right, Oahu (Honolulu market) is usually the first island to begin upgrades, etc, but Summer 2010 to finally bring in Wimax just to Honolulu after its been on the mainland years before it is way behind. Plus by then, Wimax was already starting to wind down. Like I said before, I won't be surprised if it takes a year or more to finally get things started.

 

Sent from my Rooted Sony Tablet S using Tapatalk HD

WiMax was on the mainland "years" before 2010? Am I missing something?

 

Also, in my opinion, anyone in a wimax area should be instabanned for complaining that they don't have LTE yet...

 

Pryroscott,

We had wimax through Clear wireless in Hawaii for sometime before sprint launched it as their

4g platform.

 

Also,why do you speak of

Banning people just because

we/I are inquiring about LTE?

Where in this thread am I coming across to you as complaining?

 

I for one think people who quote other's post and make a comment

That is not even about or contribute to the thread at hand

Should be banned?

 

Agreed?

 

 

 

Sent from my Coconut Wireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...