Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Lower Central Valley Market (Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia)


aelenes

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

So I heard some news from sprint that 10 towers in the fresno area are scheduled for network vision and they should be up and running in about 90 days .. The one tower I heard the rep say was on Dakota and peach but couldn't understand what other towers she said .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I heard some news from sprint that 10 towers in the fresno area are scheduled for network vision and they should be up and running in about 90 days .. The one tower I heard the rep say was on Dakota and peach but couldn't understand what other towers she said .

 

Was this in a store you heard this from, because from all information we have here on S4GRU pinpoints the start of the Lower Central Valley Market at a summer start, but if they want to start work sooner, we will definitely be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Samsung source told me a few weeks ago that they are trying to get all their markets started before summer. They really want to be the first OEM done. They want to use Sprint NV to be a spring board for more work in the U.S. Network Vision was the first large scale Samsung Network contract in America. Samsung wants to become a dominant player.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Samsung source told me a few weeks ago that they are trying to get all their markets started before summer. They really want to be the first OEM done. They want to use Sprint NV to be a spring board for more work in the U.S. Network Vision was the first large scale Samsung Network contract in America. Samsung wants to become a dominant player.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Hence the reason they jumped into the WiMax/TD-LTE RRU's. They very well could be the major provider for TD-LTE in Network Vision 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome I live near that

 

So I heard some news from sprint that 10 towers in the fresno area are scheduled for network vision and they should be up and running in about 90 days .. The one tower I heard the rep say was on Dakota and peach but couldn't understand what other towers she said .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have some bad news I called the city permits for fresno and she said that she talked to sprint January and they did not want to follow the city regulations to cover up the towers if they upgraded them and after she informed sprint about the regulations they said they were not looking to cover them up and since then they have not submitted any thing yet . But I did call fresno county building permits and the gentleman informed me sprint was doing a system upgrade in shaver lake ca they were replacing cabinets adding antennas hopefully that's lte ...

Edited by matthew23319
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have some bad news I called the city permits for fresno and she said that she talked to sprint January and they did not want to follow the city regulations to cover up the towers if they upgraded them and after she informed sprint about the regulations they said they were not looking to cover them up and since then they have not submitted any thing yet . But I did call fresno county building permits and the gentleman informed me sprint was doing a system upgrade in shaver lake ca they were replacing cabinets adding antennas hopefully that's lte ...

 

If Sprint bypasses Fresno, the outcries from "madder than hell" customers will get them in trouble with the FCC the BBB, and other agencies in charge of their business industry. They have had no problems complying with stealth requirements in other cities across the country. Give them time, they will have to redesign the plans for Fresno. No biggie, just time consuming.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And one more thing, in Vegas, all site plans have been submitted by engineering companies. They could have been the ones giving Fresno problems. Did you get any info from Clovis?

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I been trying to contact clovis and they have not returned my call . The lady from sprint permit said they are having a meeting with all carriers in a couple days but it is closed doors she mentioned that someone from sprint should be attending and if she hears anything she will email but she believes they should began submitting permits soon

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If Sprint bypasses Fresno, the outcries from "madder than hell" customers will get them in trouble with the FCC the BBB, and other agencies in charge of their business industry. They have had no problems complying with stealth requirements in other cities across the country. Give them time, they will have to redesign the plans for Fresno. No biggie, just time consuming.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

If a city has unrealistic expectations, they will just make them last. Also, Sprint is in compliance with the FCC. They don't have to add LTE or do NV upgrades if they don't want to. I don't know what you're talking about them getting into trouble.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If a city has unrealistic expectations, they will just make them last. Also, Sprint is in compliance with the FCC. They don't have to add LTE or do NV upgrades if they don't want to. I don't know what you're talking about them getting into trouble.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

I don't know. I think I was in a hurry typing that out the other day at work. I forgot that Sprint doesn't have build out requirements on G block like other carriers have on 700MHz.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the Visalia City building inspectors office today. I'm going to try to get to the building permits office before I go out of town on vacation.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tower sprint has submitted a permit is on Howard Street near river park and freeway 41

I believe work is not gonna start for quite some time

 

Anywhere between now and 6 months it will be worked on, done, and hopefully inspected.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...