Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Boston Market (all of Massachusetts)


brendan4t

Recommended Posts

Yahoo! My mother just called me and asked why it keeps flashing 4g on her viper. She works in Lynn ma. Maybe it's testing or it coming live idk but confirmed LTE l! Also eHRPD in swampscott the other day.

 

Did she get the tower info from CDMA field test or Net Monitor? How many speed tests did she run? And did she snap some pictures of the RRU's on the tower she was connecting to? :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Did she get the tower info from CDMA field test or Net Monitor? How many speed tests did she run? And did she snap some pictures of the RRU's on the tower she was connecting to? :D

 

She called me to ask why it said 4G... You think she knows any of this lol. I'm going over later an taking her phone out to her work and I'll try myself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She called me to ask why it said 4G... You think she knows any of this lol. I'm going over later an taking her phone out to her work and I'll try myself

 

I was only joking. My mom just got a phone with texting and learned how to use it a few months ago. She's not ready for a smartphone yet. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I was only joking. My mom just got a phone with texting and learned how to use it a few months ago. She's not ready for a smartphone yet. :)

 

Her og Evo died and they have her the viper for free I'm totally jealous. She only uses it for wOrds with friends and Facebook. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Downtown Boston now has eHRDP! (note that I had to toggle LTE/CDMA to CDMA and back to LTE/CDMA mode for it to switch over to eHRPD)

 

 

Update:

 

For the first time in 2 months, 3G speeds have been usable in the office. This is pretty nice going from 10kbps to 500-1500kbps. Speeds are rather variable, but it's actually functional 3G!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm seeing eHRPD in Waltham on 128 by Totten Pond Rd for the 1st time.

 

I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that last week I kept dropping calls in this area and going into roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am loggin somewhere between 1.3 to 2 Mbps down,, and around 1Mbps up @ south station. I saw this kind of results for last week or two. Hopefully we will continue to see expansion of NV sites in downtown boston area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Bedford, Ma Near Dartmouth LTE tower. Switched CDMA/LTE to CDMA only and then back. I got CDMA eHRPD for 5 seconds until my 3G came back online then switched right back to EVDO. Any insight on this? I am 3-4 blocks from the Dartmouth, Ma LTE tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scratch that! Just connected to eHRPD! Does this mean we are close to LTE here in the Boston Market??

 

While eHRPD is required for LTE to go live, having eHRPD is not an indication that LTE is ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...