Jump to content

Local news posts map of proposed local VZW 5G sites


newboyx

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, newboyx said:

Long time no see!  I remember all the hysteria about 4G too.  Sheeple!

Robert

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long time no see!  I remember all the hysteria about 4G too.  Sheeple!
Robert
How much you want to bet the same people that say this have a WiFi router in their house. [emoji2357]

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If people are worried about radiation from 5G small cells show them the transmit power for TV and radio towers. They'll really lose their minds. Your talking a handful of watts vs hundreds of thousands to millions years ago. Im not sure if they're still that strong today or not. Someone brought that point up over on HoFo when someone pointed out a SirusXM repeater at 5,000 watts I think it was. I couldn't imagine paying the electric bill for a 1,000,000 watt transmitter.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If people are worried about radiation from 5G small cells show them the transmit power for TV and radio towers. They'll really lose their minds. Your talking a handful of watts vs hundreds of thousands to millions years ago. Im not sure if they're still that strong today or not. Someone brought that point up over on HoFo when someone pointed out a SirusXM repeater at 5,000 watts I think it was. I couldn't imagine paying the electric bill for a 1,000,000 watt transmitter.
Found it.71dc4f993ce163273d310828a25a0427.jpg

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, there.  I'm a TV engineer.

Power for a TV station license is measured as effective radiated power, based on antenna gain and system losses.  So a 1000 kW TV station (max power today) will only have a transmitter capable of a fraction of that out of the transmitter.  The rest comes from not wasting power aiming at the sky or straight down at the ground.

For example, WDRB in Louisville runs 1000 kW, but the transmitter only actually produces 68.43 kW.  Still a big power bill, but not quite so big as perhaps you might have been imagining.

- Trip

 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, there.  I'm a TV engineer.
Power for a TV station license is measured as effective radiated power, based on antenna gain and system losses.  So a 1000 kW TV station (max power today) will only have a transmitter capable of a fraction of that out of the transmitter.  The rest comes from not wasting power aiming at the sky or straight down at the ground.
For example, WDRB in Louisville runs 1000 kW, but the transmitter only actually produces 68.43 kW.  Still a big power bill, but not quite so big as perhaps you might have been imagining.
- Trip
 

Plus I’d imagine television and radio stations would probably paying commercial and or industrial rates on electricity which on a per kilowatt hour rate would be cheaper than residential kilowatt hour rate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Trip said:

Hello, there.  I'm a TV engineer.

Power for a TV station license is measured as effective radiated power, based on antenna gain and system losses.  So a 1000 kW TV station (max power today) will only have a transmitter capable of a fraction of that out of the transmitter.  The rest comes from not wasting power aiming at the sky or straight down at the ground.

For example, WDRB in Louisville runs 1000 kW, but the transmitter only actually produces 68.43 kW.  Still a big power bill, but not quite so big as perhaps you might have been imagining.

- Trip

 

That makes more sense, I was imagining something like the scene from Christmas Vacation when he finally gets the Christmas lights to come on.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...