Jump to content

iPhone 7/7 Plus User's Thread


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

No, just the opposite.  The physical travel home button is perhaps the only element of an iOS device that feels plastic and cheap.

 

AJ

This. The new force touch home button actually feels very high quality. The "Taptic Engine" in the iPhone 7 does a really good job of mimicking a home button but also somehow makes it feel better than a real one (IMO) at the same time.

 

-Anthony

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. The new force touch home button actually feels very high quality. The "Taptic Engine" in the iPhone 7 does a really good job of mimicking a home button but also somehow makes it feel better than a real one (IMO) at the same time.

 

The vibration "makes it feel better than a real one."

 

That's what she said.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Also, it was used to further Jony Ive's ultimate goal of the iPhone: to be as simplistic as possible. If he had his way, the iPhone would be nothing more than a piece of glass. 

 

-Anthony

To me, having a physical button is more simplistic than relying on software to navigate the phone. I find it comforting to have something on my phone that isn't going to be messed up by a firmware update and gets me out of the application with one click (now its a press on the iphone).

Getting rid of the home button would needlessly complicate the phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So quick observation on the LTE performance. Up where I work I go to the deli and will drop LTE the further I walk. It is holding band 26 signal when my nexus would drop it for 3G!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, just the opposite. The physical travel home button is perhaps the only element of an iOS device that feels plastic and cheap.

 

AJ

Agreed. Over time, the physical home button would stick, become loose, or just not feel as solid when clicked. This haptic home button is much more consistent and will stand the test of time much better. Once you get used to it, it feels as good or better than the physical button, IMO.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, having a physical button is more simplistic than relying on software to navigate the phone. I find it comforting to have something on my phone that isn't going to be messed up by a firmware update and gets me out of the application with one click (now its a press on the iphone).

Getting rid of the home button would needlessly complicate the phone.

I'm unsure how having more moving parts makes a device more simplistic than a device with less?

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm unsure how having more moving parts makes a device more simplistic than a device with less?

 

-Anthony

The lack of a clicking home button is just apples intro into putting the home button into the screen. This is just their way of easing us into it.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but but but what will all the iphools do without a home button!!11!!1

 

 

I think its dumb if they eventually move to a software button, as a physical home button is one of the 'defining features' of an iphones design, physically and software wise.

 

Where will this software button go? will they leave a black bar at the bottom with just the single button icon?

 

What about landscape mode, will the software button rotate with the screen portrait/landscape?

 

or will they copy android and add a back and multitask button on either side of the home button?

 

will it simply be the existing assistive touch button? (options > general > accessibility > assistivetouch)

 

 

so many questions!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm unsure how having more moving parts makes a device more simplistic than a device with less?

 

-Anthony

I wasn't really referring to the click home button vs the taptichome button. I guess it's just my preference to prefer a mechanical one.

I was wanting your thoughts as to Jony Ive's vision of how a slab of glass would be simplistic. Visually, yeah. But functionally I see it being more complicated.

 

Dedub summed up my thoughts of how apple would work around a home button-less iphone.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wanting your thoughts as to Jony Ive's vision of how a slab of glass would be simplistic. Visually, yeah. But functionally I see it being more complicated.

Visually simplistic. Apple has almost always chosen form over function, ever since the original Apple 1.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So my phone isn't coming today the idiots over in China didn't ship it with the correct shipment so it got delayed. Won't get here til Monday. 

 

Because of your post, one of those "idiots over in China" was beaten by Foxconn management, another was locked in the dormitory without meals, and a third committed suicide by jumping out of a window.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because of your post, one of those "idiots over in China" was beaten by Foxconn management, another was locked in the dormitory without meals, and a third committed suicide by jumping out of a window.

 

AJ

I was talking about UPS [emoji24][emoji24][emoji24]

 

But you are right that was very harsh and I apologize to those people in China [emoji18]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by IsaiahL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because of your post, one of those "idiots over in China" was beaten by Foxconn management, another was locked in the dormitory without meals, and a third committed suicide by jumping out of a window.

 

AJ

Actually, they've got nets for that now.

 

;)

 

-Anthony

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was talking about UPS

 

And you know this how?  Because somebody at UPS told you?  If so, my guess is that you are getting fed a line just to get you to go away.  You are aware that iPhone 7 is in short supply everywhere right now, yes?  Delays are par for the course.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know this how? Because somebody at UPS told you? If so, my guess is that you are getting fed a line just to get you to go away. You are aware that iPhone 7 is in short supply everywhere right now, yes? Delays are par for the course.

 

AJ

Nobody told me anything bro. I'm going off the fact that UPS is the chosen shipping provider and they didn't tender my phone until after the first shipment for this weekend left. But it's okay patiences is a virtue. It'll be here before I know it.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by IsaiahL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody told me anything bro. I'm going off the fact that UPS is the chosen shipping provider and they didn't tender my phone until after the first shipment for this weekend left.

 

And this shows that UPS in China is "stupid" how?  Because your iPhone did not make a certain shipment?  Too many variables to conclude anything.

 

It is "bruh," by the way.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this shows that UPS in China is "stupid" how? Because your iPhone did not make a certain shipment? Too many variables to conclude anything.

 

It is "bruh," by the way.

 

AJ

Okay..

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my iPhone 7 Plus and I'm loving it. Speed tested my WiFi and it's blazing. The new home button isn't as weird as everyone said I actually like it more. The speakers AH masing [emoji23]. So far so good. I'm going to the apple store to see if can get a glass screen protector from Zagg & a case better safe than sorry.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my iPhone 7 Plus and I'm loving it. Speed tested my WiFi and it's blazing. The new home button isn't as weird as everyone said I actually like it more. The speakers AH masing [emoji23]. So far so good. I'm going to the apple store to see if can get a glass screen protector from Zagg & a case better safe than sorry.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You didn't Amazon a screen protector and case while you waited?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't Amazon a screen protector and case while you waited??

No i didn't, I was gonna but then I decided I would just wait and use my old phone to get an apple gift card and buy accessories there cause I'm broke lol.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turns out apple doesn't take trade in's unless you're buying a new phone which I think is ridiculous. I'm gonna go to BestBuy to trade in my old phone for a gift card there. Hopefully they give me a good amount.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turns out apple doesn't take trade in's unless you're buying a new phone which I think is ridiculous. I'm gonna go to BestBuy to trade in my old phone for a gift card there. Hopefully they give me a good amount.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who did you buy the phone from?

 

If it's Sprint, can u easy pay the accessories?

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...