Thanks for noticing the typo.
AI is latest buzzword. Mention it a lot and your stock price goes up LOL SMH.
No doubt more 600MHz is much better than the 800MHz. Worse case is 800MHz is counted against T-Mobile in spectrum caps and they are not using it.
No such thing as AI, only models that make things up. Dumb.
Can they keep 800 MHz even if they want to? I thought that was a condition of the merger. And I believe they'd have to go install new equipment in support of that 5x5 carrier, which seems like a lot of money and effort for little reward.
I have two phones that have n77 enabled but dedicated principally to other bands. So far, I have yet to see any T-Mobile n77. It's possible it's set for NSA-only. I also imagine I would have seen some equipment for it installed.
I assume that's backwards; 165 is too large for urban and too small for rural?
- Trip
https://www.lightreading.com/ai-machine-learning/t-mobile-uses-algorithmic-ai-to-guide-5g-expansion
Lots of tidbits in this article:
AI determined they did not need 3.45, 800MHz was not saleable so now they are determining whether they will keep it, 60% of their c-band is in use so we need to start hunting for it. They use 165 meter hexagons to evaluate service. I would argue this is to large for urban areas and too small for rural.
My guess is that TMo will do the mmWave HSI on 24/28 GHz, as they haven't relinquished the 24 GHz, and for 28 GHz they'll build out closer to the edges of their newly smaller licensed areas if enough people pick up the service.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.