Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

For some states. Others like michigan there's no regional carrier.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, we already know Michigan native expansion is taking place.  I've seen people on reddit reporting new coverage in north Michigan.

 

What is most interesting is the state of Kansas.  Take a look at their coverage map from the DT capital markets day https://i.imgur.com/SddSbpU.png.  LTE coverage in Kansas is nearly identical to the partner coverage currently in place.  This tells me that there is a good chance rural Kansas LTE coverage will be through a partner carrier leasing spectrum from T-Mobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, we already know Michigan native expansion is taking place. I've seen people on reddit reporting new coverage in north Michigan.

 

What is most interesting is the state of Kansas. Take a look at their coverage map from the DT capital markets day https://i.imgur.com/SddSbpU.png. LTE coverage in Kansas is nearly identical to the partner coverage currently in place. This tells me that there is a good chance rural Kansas LTE coverage will be through a partner carrier leasing spectrum from T-Mobile.

Are there gsm regionals left besides viaro?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there gsm regionals left besides viaro?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Viaero is the only GSM regional, but T-Mobile wouldn't necessarily need a GSM carrier if they are just focused on LTE expansion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That solves the mystery of how TMO will be growing to 300mil of decent quality lte.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why only decent?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have low expectations of TMO. I like ten and all but outside the city limits, kaput.

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Gotcha so this its pretty much a rush job outside of the city? I need to ask one of my friends who does have T-Mobile how the data is outside of the city. I know for Columbus OH there is lte on the highways.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, we already know Michigan native expansion is taking place.  I've seen people on reddit reporting new coverage in north Michigan.

Would you be willing to link to that?

 

I've seen a lot of people talk about the Northern Michigan rollout has starting. But I've seen zero objective evidence of it so far (no permits, nothing on sensorly, etc)

 

Everything I've seen to date has been existing 2G -> 4G upgrades, or switchover of Metro sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Would you be willing to link to that?

 

I've seen a lot of people talk about the Northern Michigan rollout has starting. But I've seen zero objective evidence of it so far (no permits, nothing on sensorly, etc)

 

Everything I've seen to date has been existing 2G -> 4G upgrades, or switchover of Metro sites.

They were just one off comments here and there. I don't think I could find them again. They may have been talking about the 2G conversions though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were just one off comments here and there. I don't think I could find them again. They may have been talking about the 2G conversions though.

If you look at the mvno 2g, 3G, lte maps, parts that have no 2g have 3G and lte.

I'm not near my PC is I don't have the links.

Will post when I have them.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is most interesting is the state of Kansas.  Take a look at their coverage map from the DT capital markets day https://i.imgur.com/SddSbpU.png.  LTE coverage in Kansas is nearly identical to the partner coverage currently in place.  This tells me that there is a good chance rural Kansas LTE coverage will be through a partner carrier leasing spectrum from T-Mobile.

 

What partner in western Kansas?  It is not Viaero -- its coverage is not that substantial.  No, when I look at western Kansas on that projected coverage map, I see mostly RCC Unicel's footprint that VZW acquired, then divested to AT&T.  So, that is AT&T, which you can rest assured is not T-Mobile's partner.

 

Honestly, I think that T-Mobile map is a fabrication -- in many ways.  It is just an approximation of what T-Mobile had in mind several months ago.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well im in Chicago and have had T-Mobile/Metro for about 9 months now and i can honestly say being a former Sprint customer im surprised how good and fast T-Mobile is here in Chicago and the burbs. On a slow day ill get at least 5mb and normally about 25-30mb constantly.

 

Sent from my LG Optimus F60 on MetroPCS using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well im in Chicago and have had T-Mobile/Metro for about 9 months now and i can honestly say being a former Sprint customer im surprised how good and fast T-Mobile is here in Chicago and the burbs. On a slow day ill get at least 5mb and normally about 25-30mb constantly.

 

Sent from my LG Optimus F60 on MetroPCS using Tapatalk

What zip are you mainly in? Ookla says TMO is 8mbps avg and root hasn't done Chicago recently (sep 2014).

 

I'm curious if you're getting those good/bad speeds in city or dense suburb.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im in the city. 60644 on the west side and 60621 on the south side.

 

Sent from my LG Optimus F60 on MetroPCS using Tapatalk

AJ says ookla is inaccurate. Given your experience, do you think 8mbps avg for tmo in Chicago is accurate?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ says ookla is inaccurate. Given your experience, do you think 8mbps avg for tmo in Chicago is accurate?

 

No, I said that Ookla is not the "gold standard."  

 

First, remove server selection from the equation; that is a whole other ball of wax.

 

But what relevance does one or even a few Ookla speed tests have -- besides to the runner at that very location at that time?  In the multipath wireless, multiple access network world, here is the statistical answer:  close to zero.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ says ookla is inaccurate. Given your experience, do you think 8mbps avg for tmo in Chicago is accurate?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would say 6 Mbps average would be more accurate where I've used T-Mo in this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile is pretty terrible in the busier places of the Chicagoland area. It's like immediately upon entering Chicago city limits, and there's wall-to-wall traffic, and people everywhere, you can expect sub-1mbps speeds until later at night. These are my experiences, and YMMV. Hopefully, when T-Mobile makes us 15x15, we'll see some relief, but I doubt it. This market is pretty saturated with T-Mobile customers.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile is pretty terrible in the busier places of the Chicagoland area. It's like immediately upon entering Chicago city limits, and there's wall-to-wall traffic, and people everywhere, you can expect sub-1mbps speeds until later at night. These are my experiences, and YMMV. Hopefully, when T-Mobile makes us 15x15, we'll see some relief, but I doubt it. This market is pretty saturated with T-Mobile customers.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

I'm surprised TMO doesn't make it as dense as NYC.

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...