Jump to content

Does Sprint have plans for service for WiMax home customers when the network shuts down?


KnarfOH

Recommended Posts

why not just go with sprint or verizon or AT&Ts own services then? sprint has 12GB of month for data at $79.99 and verizon has 10GB for $60. i didnt look into AT&T but it looks like you still have options open if you are willing to spend like $20 more a month.

 

 

actually i have no idea how much the wimax service costs but i was thinking like $59.00/mo or &69.99/mo

 

Either way your not out of luck you just need to go with another carrier.

The premise, though, is that Clearwire was unlimited data. All of the current options are capped, at a low amount, at a ridiculously higher price than Clear. Clear was priced and treated like a true home ISP replacement. A mobile hotspot really is not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The premise, though, is that Clearwire was unlimited data. All of the current options are capped, at a low amount, at a ridiculously higher price than Clear. Clear was priced and treated like a true home ISP replacement. A mobile hotspot really is not.

 

 

you know what i was told as a kid when i wanted something? "to bad". WiMax is dead, in a year or less you will be without an ISP. either go with another wireless service that has enough data (he said he only uses like 10 GB a month) or go without internet.

 

The choice is easy, you only need to make one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until www.freedompop.com stops selling wimax devices, then the end of wimax won't be any time soon.

 

Once they do pull all wimax devices, then I give it 6 months to a year.

Edited by dedub
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until www.freedompop.com stops selling wimax devices, then the end of wimax won't be any time soon.

 

Once they do pull all wimax devices, then I give it 6 months to a year.

They will be pulling some markets early. There are some markets where they can only achieve three 20MHz channels for LTE and CA. Sprint is planning to shut down WiMax early in these markets than the stated sunset date of December 31, 2015. Whenever they are ready to add the third channel.

 

Also, a few markets they are ripping and replacing Motorola equipment and Samsung equipment (in Nokia markets) at Clearwire sites and replacing with LTE Only 8T8R Equipment. Also, all Huawei equipment must be replaced before 2016. Where this happens, it may be one site here and one site there or market wide.

 

Very few WiMax markets will go through completely unscathed to the sunset date. Probably more than 3/4 of WiMax customers will have some sort of impact before the deadline.

 

But Sprint will be offering LTE devices to affected customers (but not likely MVNO customers). It is not likely though they will be allowed to keep their Clearwire plans though. They will likely be forced to a new Sprint plan, unless they are still on contract when it occurs. But I think all WiMax contracts will be exhausted by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They still have not notified any clear (or freedompop) customers, to my knowledge and I am a customer of both, to any such coverage, device, or plan changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They still have not notified any clear (or freedompop) customers, to my knowledge and I am a customer of both, to any such coverage, device, or plan changes.

 

They do not have to give any warning.  They do not guarantee service in any area.  They would likely give 30 days notice minimum though.  Freedompop may receive earlier warning from Sprint, depending on the terms of their contract.  Sprint has known they will be shutting down some WiMax early for over a year.  They even modified their terms for it.  So there is already likely a plan worked out with their MVNO's.

 

How or when the MVNO's pass on information to their customers is not Sprint's concern.  The MVNO's may give information far in advance, they may only give 30 days.  They may be completely inept and give none.  It will likely be highly variable from one MVNO to another.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may or may not 'have' to give a warning, but any company worth their name ought to opt to provide as much warning as necessary, keeping in mind they not only have hotspot, but residential and BUSINESS customers on wimax services.

 

I am quite sure that the existing user base, while perhaps slowly dwindling on it's own, is not such an insignificant size to simply shut off with 30 days or less warning, especially if they want to attempt to transition them to a more expensive and/or more limited sprint specific service.

 

It is simply good business not to 'dump' your customers, regardless of the opinion of those customers on these forums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may or may not 'have' to give a warning, but any company worth their name ought to opt to provide as much warning as necessary, keeping in mind they not only have hotspot, but residential and BUSINESS customers on wimax services.

 

Likely, many of these WiMAX MVNOs will simply close up shop.  Their business model will have failed.  That is why notice may be limited.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may or may not 'have' to give a warning, but any company worth their name ought to opt to provide as much warning as necessary, keeping in mind they not only have hotspot, but residential and BUSINESS customers on wimax services.

 

I am quite sure that the existing user base, while perhaps slowly dwindling on it's own, is not such an insignificant size to simply shut off with 30 days or less warning, especially if they want to attempt to transition them to a more expensive and/or more limited sprint specific service.

 

It is simply good business not to 'dump' your customers, regardless of the opinion of those customers on these forums.

 

 

OK, so MVNO's may not be worth their salt.  I would suspect they are not.  I don't think many MVNO's have many business customers.  Why would Sprint make sure that their MVNO's give notice to their customers or not?  As AJ points out, I would suspect a lot of Clearwire MVNO's close shop at the end of WiMax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree about mnvo's, there is not a lot sprint can do about those, aside from whatever contract obligations provide.

 

And the wimax mnvo business may very well be insignificant.

 

My point is and has been pointed at sprint/clear, who can't really afford to dump on clear customers for a number of reasons;

 

1) it would be bad business plain and simple, sprint is trying to improve their image, not tarnish it further.

2) their current customers are obviously still a revenue stream that the competition hasn't already absorbed.

3) until the point where they do need to shut down the network, they obviously will want to keep such revenue streams. Entropy I think is the term, where the revenue stream and network costs (which ought to be minimal by now anyway) criss-cross.

4) they want and need to convert those customer to sprint services, so pissing them off is not a real good way to start that.

5) there is not only the clear customers, but also sprint's own pre-paid brands which sold wimax phones until recently. I believe there are already considerations for legacy sprint wimax phones (evo etc) and pre-paid phones in the T's&C's as has been mentioned.

 

In any case, I am not denying that wimax will eventually go away, but that it is in sprints best interest to be on top of the ball and be pro-active with their wimax user base.

 

The last thing sprint needs is a repeat of nextel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree about mnvo's, there is not a lot sprint can do about those, aside from whatever contract obligations provide.

 

And the wimax mnvo business may very well be insignificant.

 

My point is and has been pointed at sprint/clear, who can't really afford to dump on clear customers for a number of reasons;

 

1) it would be bad business plain and simple, sprint is trying to improve their image, not tarnish it further.

2) their current customers are obviously still a revenue stream that the competition hasn't already absorbed.

3) until the point where they do need to shut down the network, they obviously will want to keep such revenue streams. Entropy I think is the term, where the revenue stream and network costs (which ought to be minimal by now anyway) criss-cross.

4) they want and need to convert those customer to sprint services, so pissing them off is not a real good way to start that.

5) there is not only the clear customers, but also sprint's own pre-paid brands which sold wimax phones until recently. I believe there are already considerations for legacy sprint wimax phones (evo etc) and pre-paid phones in the T's&C's as has been mentioned.

 

In any case, I am not denying that wimax will eventually go away, but that it is in sprints best interest to be on top of the ball and be pro-active with their wimax user base.

 

The last thing sprint needs is a repeat of nextel.

 

Sounds good.  No one said Sprint is not going to give notice to their direct subs.  I said they would likely give 30 days minimum.  Maybe even more.  I wouldn't count on anything from an MVNO though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may or may not 'have' to give a warning, but any company worth their name ought to opt to provide as much warning as necessary, keeping in mind they not only have hotspot, but residential and BUSINESS customers on wimax services.

 

I am quite sure that the existing user base, while perhaps slowly dwindling on it's own, is not such an insignificant size to simply shut off with 30 days or less warning, especially if they want to attempt to transition them to a more expensive and/or more limited sprint specific service.

 

It is simply good business not to 'dump' your customers, regardless of the opinion of those customers on these forums.

 

I have to agree, Sprint needs the customers and the current Wimax subs are not motivated to switch considering that there is no alternative in mobile broadband. Freedompop is about to close on the one million accounts mark and these customers are 95% on Wimax. FP actually makes money. Not sure how Sprint is counting these subs because Wimax (clear) had still about 1.3 million customers active. 

 

Likely, many of these WiMAX MVNOs will simply close up shop.  Their business model will have failed.  That is why notice may be limited.

 

AJ

 

They may or may not or just transition to LTE.

 

Sounds good.  No one said Sprint is not going to give notice to their direct subs.  I said they would likely give 30 days minimum.  Maybe even more.  I wouldn't count on anything from an MVNO though.

 

I would expect Sprint to offer current Clear subs LTE modems and special plans to recapture as many as possible, much like Sprint did with Nextel subs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may or may not or just transition to LTE.

 

And monkeys may or may not fly out of my butt.  Honest truth.

 

A "may or may not" statement might as well be left unsaid -- because the substance of the assertion is practically zero.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And monkeys may or may not fly out of my butt.  Honest truth.

 

A "may or may not" statement might as well be left unsaid -- because the substance of the assertion is practically zero.

 

AJ

 

FreedomPOP is transitioning already and started to sell LTE equipment. Fire sale on wimax. 

Netzero, who knows...

Karma, who cares...

 

Clear, many would like to know.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

another link and more info;

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/mvno-karma-launches-first-lte-product-sprint-doubles-user-base-100000/2014-09-23

 

tri-band lte + 3g fallback

 

and... 

 

 

 

Karma will continue to support its existing WiMAX devices for at least another year and maybe into 2016. Van Wel said customers' data balances can be transferred from its WiMAX device to its new LTE device.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MVNO's are seeing the writing on the wall and moving themselves over to Sprint LTE.  Sprint is likely matching the Clearwire MVNO wholesale rate.  And since Sprint will be giving free devices and helping their own customers migrate, I see the WiMax sunset calamity being much ado about nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MVNO's are seeing the writing on the wall and moving themselves over to Sprint LTE.  Sprint is likely matching the Clearwire MVNO wholesale rate.  And since Sprint will be giving free devices and helping their own customers migrate, I see the WiMax sunset calamity being much ado about nothing.

 

There used to be a lot of talk during Clearwire's conference calls how cheap they can transfer data to the customer compared to traditional networks. Any numbers on that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There used to be a lot of talk during Clearwire's conference calls how cheap they can transfer data to the customer compared to traditional networks. Any numbers on that?

I believe that was relative to 3G networks. There is not likely a WiMax cost advantage now over LTE because of economies of scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the stock photo: an old wimax photon hotspot :tu:

 

I am pretty sure that is the new lte hotspot, just in the same form factor as the photon.

 

the gigaom link shows a different photo angle, it has different power/lights/usb port positions etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that was relative to 3G networks. There is not likely a WiMax cost advantage now over LTE because of economies of scale.

 

I'm not sure because the CEO was bragging how they were able to deliver data cheaper as Verizon and AT&T. I think it was because Clearwire was an all IP based network? Not sure but how much does it actually cost Sprint right now to run the network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure that is the new lte hotspot, just in the same form factor as the photon.

 

the gigaom link shows a different photo angle, it has different power/lights/usb port positions etc.

 

Nope, unless the new LTE modem is identical to the photon. Even the FP (blue) photon had little white rings around the LED's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 2 identical photons I have (clear and freedom pop), the lights are on the opposite side as the usb plug.

 

Unless for some reason the karma device did not use the same photon as clear/freedompop, that appears to be a different device in the same form factor (as the articles mention, the new lte device is the same 'puck' as the wimax device).

 

In any case, I guess we will hopefully see FP and clear/sprint rolling these out themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...