Jump to content

Starting October 1, Verizon Will Include Unlimited 4G LTE Customers in “Network Optimization”


GoBigRed79

Recommended Posts

This is where band 41 will pay dividends for sprint well sort of, because if the merger go through then that goofy tmobile ceo will take the credit. Data usage will keep going up even for casual users, but all the data hogs are now residents of Pinkville.

 

 

WWireless users that are data hogs give you clues like 20 megabits down is terrible sprint you sucks etc etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Data usage will keep going up even for casual users, but all the data hogs are now residents of Pinkville.

 

So, if I have one line on T-Mobile, one line on Sprint, does that mean "one in the pink, one in the stink"?

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if I have one line on T-Mobile, one line on Sprint, does that mean "one in the pink, one in the stink"?

 

:P

 

AJ

Well, you don't live too far from Wichita so maybe you should switch to The Shocker. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya gotta love that. Sprint announced Spark is in Seattle ergo his speed test is definitely on Spark  :blink:.

The even more curious thing here is that to my knowledge (and the coverage map) Sprint has not announced Seattle as a Spark market. Tacoma has both been announced and is on the coverage map, but Seattle is not. So he is essentially complaining based on faulty information.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you don't live too far from Wichita so maybe you should switch to The Shocker.

Sorry, I am a little more old fashioned than that...

 

85864.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why has no one else commented on this yet! You deserve some kind of trophy for getting a like from AJ...!

 

A1212.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The even more curious thing here is that to my knowledge (and the coverage map) Sprint has not announced Seattle as a Spark market. Tacoma has both been announced and is on the coverage map, but Seattle is not. So he is essentially complaining based on faulty information.

 

Oh wow, I hadn't even noticed that. Well that is indeed an excellent point lol!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...