Jump to content

AT&T scoops up 40,000 customers, spectrum assets of Plateau Wireless


Rawvega

Recommended Posts

And another one bites the dust.

 

 

AT&T Mobility (NYSE: T) is looking to purchase 40,000 customers, a handful of spectrum licenses and "related operations and assets" of Plateau Wireless, which offers wireless service across eastern New Mexico and West Texas and will exit the wireless business via the sale. The transaction, which still requires FCC approval, is scheduled to be completed in the second half of this year.

Read more: AT&T scoops up 40,000 customers, spectrum assets of Plateau Wireless - FierceWireless http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/att-scoops-40000-customers-spectrum-assets-plateau-wireless/2014-06-24#ixzz35aCMaVFJ 
Subscribe at FierceWireless

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And another one bites the dust.

 

I thought Plateau was bought out by VZW last year?  Hmmm,

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who knew? Do a query on my username and "Plateau." I have been saying for years that this would happen.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The carrier also disclosed details of the spectrum it is acquiring as part of the transaction:

  • In NM-4 (Santa Fe): 20 MHz of AWS A band, 25 MHz of 850 MHz B band, 12 MHz of 700 MHz C band
  • In TX-3 (Parmer): 20 MHz of AWS A band, 25 MHz of 850 MHz B band, 12 MHz of 700 MHz C band
  • In NM-2 (Colfax): 20 MHz of AWS A band, 25 MHz of 850 MHz B band

AT&T's LTE network works in AWS and 700 MHz spectrum.

 

 

AT&T doesn't need that 850. Is it something Sprint could want or need in those markets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T doesn't need that 850. Is it something Sprint could want or need in those markets?

AT&T will still use CLR for GSM/UMTS/HSPA, though they probably should consider refarming that frequency for LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T will still use CLR for GSM/UMTS/HSPA, though they probably should consider refarming that frequency for LTE.

 

In some areas ATT already has Band 5 deployed for LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Plateau was bought out by VZW last year?  Hmmm,

 

I am certain we had a discussion that day the VZW transaction affected only the CMA for Roswell, etc.  Your memory must be slipping now in your dotage.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spectrum details in the Fierce Wireless article are incomplete.  Though Plateau holds the Cellular B block license in the CMA for Santa Fe, it is a partitioned license.  Santa Fe County, the only even moderately urban county in that CMA, has long been partitioned to VZW.  Plateau is not licensed the Cellular B block in Santa Fe County.

 

From a site that I maintain for historical purposes, see the license maps below:

 

southwest.gif

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am certain we had a discussion that day the VZW transaction affected only the CMA for Roswell, etc. Your memory must be slipping now in your dotage.

 

;)

 

AJ

Through the foggy haze of my 'forgotten file' that seems vaguely familiar.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is is the ownership structure/management of Plateau Wireless; who is getting paid out in this deal and how much? :)

 

Plateau is a rural telecom cooperative, so the ownership structure is probably quite fractured.  Sadly, many of these coops have already sold off or will soon sell off their wireless assets -- likely because of the expense of acquiring new spectrum for LTE and/or deploying LTE.  Keep in mind that Plateau is licensed for half the state of New Mexico but has only 40,000 wireless subs across which to spread and justify CAPEX.  For perspective, during the university academic year, Sprint may approach 40,000 wireless subs in my county alone.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...