Jump to content

SoftBank is lighting a fire under Sprint


jamisonshaw125

Recommended Posts

it's kind of apples and oranges from a car dealership and a telecommunications corporation.

 

No, it is not.  And that is why career salesman shift jobs from selling cars to insurance to mortgages to electronics.  Sales is sales.  And in many instances, the more knowledgeable and informative the salesman is, the more indecisive the consumer becomes in the face of a more complex choice.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it is not.  And that is why career salesman shift jobs from selling cars to insurance to mortgages to electronics.  Sales is sales.  And in many instances, the more knowledgeable and informative the salesman is, the more indecisive the consumer becomes in the face of a more complex choice.

 

AJ

I won't argue with you about it because I've succeeded in multiple sale fields. Yes it's enough to be informed about technology, but the actual interworks of the network is asking a lot. I guarantee most Verizon salesman don't know which frequency they use in their cellphones. the company should push it to an employee. So you're telling me it's relevant from going to a car dealership to a cellphone store. It's simply not the same. I've done both jobs

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't argue with you about it because I've succeeded in multiple sale fields. Yes it's enough to be informed about technology, but the actual interworks of the network is asking a lot. I guarantee most Verizon salesman don't know which frequency they use in their cellphones. the company should push it to an employee. So you're telling me it's relevant from going to a car dealership to a cellphone store. It's simply not the same. I've done both jobs

I made over $100k my first year selling cars. It was from being knowledgable. You would be surprised how many country folk know about gear ratios, torque curves, the steal frame beams under the chassis, etc and how well they respond to someone who could talk down and dirty about a truck. The same can go for a network. If you know the inside and out of the type of network, the technology and the differences between the network operators, I am sure you'd be surprised how many people would be receptive to it. Google is a powerful tool. A 12 year old can easily research how to build a nuclear weapon using simple parts for the science fair. If you don't believe me, just Google it. A kid got into trouble a few years back for that very thing. If you can Google about how to build a nuclear bomb, you can Google how Verizon uses a cell sector and the characteristics of their AWS spectrum.

 

Edit: Bringing this back to topic, perhaps with SoftBank pressure, there will be more push to keep the front line sales reps at a higher caliber of tech knowledge. Just because the guy at the Verizon store is an uninformed ignoramus doesn't mean their Sprint counterpart needs to be. Sprint needs to stand out. Intelligence breeds confidence. Just saying.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're telling me it's relevant from going to a car dealership to a cellphone store. It's simply not the same. I've done both jobs

 

I am reflecting the reality of the situation.  Managers do not care what salesman know.  They care that salesman move product -- be it cars or cellphones.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience i can tell you that 96 out of a 100 people are completely dumbfounded when i talk about tri band, spark or really anything techinical. All they hear is bigger is better....bigger mp cameras or bigger processors. And in the end they just act confused and ask for a galaxy or iphone. Thanks to great marketing people do not give a fuck other than does it work and do you have the gold one. Lol

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience i can tell you that 96 out of a 100 people are completely dumbfounded when i talk about tri band, spark or really anything techinical. All they hear is bigger is better....bigger mp cameras or bigger processors. And in the end they just act confused and ask for a galaxy or iphone. Thanks to great marketing people do not give a fuck other than does it work and do you have the gold one. Lol

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience i can tell you that 96 out of a 100 people are completely dumbfounded when i talk about tri band, spark or really anything techinical. All they hear is bigger is better....bigger mp cameras or bigger processors. And in the end they just act confused and ask for a galaxy or iphone. Thanks to great marketing people do not give a fuck other than does it work and do you have the gold one. Lol

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

Don't ask me about an iPhone or "Galaxy". Anytime someone asks me which one of those to get, I simply say "How about an HTC?" 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Santa should've brought her some -ahem- battery operated toys.  ;)

Joan has to be pushing age 70 by now. Too much vibration might disintegrate her into dust.

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

She 's a woman with an opinion. OMG. Let's resort to the vibrator jokes.

A ranty, often inaccurate, obsessive and unnecessarily negative opinion. Id like to think her gender has nothing to do with that.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A ranty, often inaccurate, obsessive and unnecessarily negative opinion. Id like to think her gender has nothing to do with that.

 

See:  Craig Moffett.

 

Some people just pursue vendettas against Sprint.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See:  Craig Moffett.

 

Some people just pursue vendettas against Sprint.

 

AJ

 

Indeed.

 

http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2013/12/23/att-verizon-sprint-estimates-too-high-says-moffettnathanson/?mod=yahoobarrons&ru=yahoo

 

 

Regarding Sprint, whose estimates he sees as being the most unrealistic at the moment, Moffett casts doubt...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly if it was a guy, We'd come up with something else. We're equally offensive to everyone, not just someone.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

 

Arguments are weak when your only rebuttal is an attack on her commentary using some sexist remark.  Class act for sure.  

 

She may not be a huge Sprint fan but who cares.  It/s her opinion.  I'd say more people dislike Sprint in the industry then defend them.  Sprint will earn her fans as her network improves.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See:  Craig Moffett.

 

Some people just pursue vendettas against Sprint.

 

AJ

 

 

This is interesting from Moffet:  

 

Writes Moffett, “One fascinating reading from a Washington expert with whom we conferred postulated that it was Sprint’s own Washington office that had floated the story in order to elicit a response from experts that would demonstrate to their Japanese owners that a merger simply isn’t feasible from a regulatory standpoint.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Journalism is too much about opinions and overly exaggerated hyperbole these days. Unfortunately, you will be hard pressed to read anything unbiased and logical.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arguments are weak when your only rebuttal is an attack on her commentary using some sexist remark.  Class act for sure.  

 

"GinaDee," you have not been around very long, so you do not know the backstory.  Robert and others previously countered Joan's diatribes, inaccuracies, and wishful thinking in the comments to her articles.  She may know investing, but she does not know spectrum.  And when it comes to Sprint, she is incorrigible.  Thus, we no longer give her credence or acknowledgement.

 

Would you like to join her?

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting from Moffet:

 

Yeah, that is "interesting" because disseminating the rumor serves Moffett's anti Sprint purposes.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...