Jump to content

Shentel / Sprint LTE - (was ntelos - West & N&W Virginia)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

Just chatted with another nTelos representative. I was told they have done "soft" launches in Beckley and Waynesboro, I asked if Sprint customers could connect once it is formally launched but i was continuously told that the roaming agreement is only for 3G data. Then again i know online chats like that should be taken with a grain of salt so it was probably just a tactic to provoke me into switching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just chatted with another nTelos representative. I was told they have done "soft" launches in Beckley and Waynesboro, I asked if Sprint customers could connect once it is formally launched but i was continuously told that the roaming agreement is only for 3G data. Then again i know online chats like that should be taken with a grain of salt so it was probably just a tactic to provoke me into switching.

man what a crock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The roaming agreement for ev-do only. I don't think the ntelos reps know what they're talking about. I'm with you he was trying to get you to switch since it's live in Beckley.

Back on the 18th Robert posted on this thread saying that Sprint users will "DEFINITELY" connect, it was written and signed and over with, and further supports that they are trying to directly sell us the service.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

Edited by shawneyboy123
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back on the 18th Robert posted on this thread saying that Sprint users will "DEFINITELY" connect, it was written and signed and over with, and further supports that they are trying to directly sell us the service.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

Yep. But further switch integration or network authentication integration with Sprint may be required. It could take a few weeks. Also, the agreement between Sprint and nTelos is not a roaming agreement. It is a wholesale network agreement. nTelos coverage is native for Sprint customers. Not roaming. And the difference is very significant.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all. I'm a new poster but a long time peruser.  Thought you all would appreciate this screenshot from Waynseboro the other day.  I'm an nTelos user for 17 years and this was taken on the moto x.

Also everywhere I've been from Amherst to Lynchburg I have been connected to eHRPD instead of evdo and my ping times and speed on 3g are considerably faster.post-32252-0-79127900-1387819975_thumb.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thought...is the nTelos LTE released so far in PCS? I know that nTelos also has AWS holdings.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thought...is the nTelos LTE released so far in PCS? I know that nTelos also has AWS holdings.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

i know that when i did have LTE in waynesboro it was band 13.  Which is what Verizon uses I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know that when i did have LTE in waynesboro it was band 13.  Which is what Verizon uses I thought.

If that is true then it may be bad news... Unless it doesn't require PCS to connect under that agreement. Most phones do have the hardware to connect to that band anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted Image I asked if we could connect under the wholesale network agreement and what band their LTE has been deployed on. Good news is that is is 1900 Band 25 according to her. But still telling me that even under the agreement it only allows for 3G data not 4G.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What hope would there be for anyone here to find out if this detail about the agreement is true. They seem to be pretty insistent, as if they were prepared to answer that question. Lying about it would be pretty bad for them. It would false be advertising, intentionally hurting their direct customer / partner.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

Edited by mrancier
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just called Sprint about this and, according to the agent that I talk to, this is true. He said that ,as far as he could see, they did not have an LTE agreement with NTELOS. He seemed to to imply that they would be over building for LTE. Probably BS, but depressing anyway.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a quick search I did while waiting for new tires to be installed, I came up with this link: http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20130925/carriers/ntelos-sprint-resolve-billing-issue/

 

In the last paragraph it talks about Sprint customers and their LTE network. I recall one of the Sprint executives saying verbally after this agreement was reached for the billing problems that they have worked out an LTE wholesale agreement. I don't remember if it was an investor conference or quarterly earnings call Q&A. But I wasn't able to find that with a quick search just now.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they are still playing hardball with Sprint: They want to get bought out. Otherwise, a move that could affect 40% of your revenue, would make no sense. This, of course, if any of what the agent told me is true

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a quick search I did while waiting for new tires to be installed, I came up with this link: http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20130925/carriers/ntelos-sprint-resolve-billing-issue/

 

In the last paragraph it talks about Sprint customers and their LTE network. I recall one of the Sprint executives saying verbally after this agreement was reached for the billing problems that they have worked out an LTE wholesale agreement. I don't remember if it was an investor conference or quarterly earnings call Q&A. But I wasn't able to find that with a quick search just now.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Thank you. Hope it holds. Why are NTELOS people clearly lying ?

 

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. Hope it holds. Why are NTELOS people clearly lying ?

 

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Lying? Misinformed? Guessing? I have no idea. However, Sprint often does the same thing. Gross ineptitude or blatant falsehoods? Who knows??

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...