Jump to content

Throughput of different bands


Recommended Posts

I was wondering about connection throughput. Will a 5x5 LTE connection in the 2.5Ghz band give faster throughput than the same link in the 1900 PCS band? And if the higher frequency gives more throughput how much higher is that throughput?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering about connection throughput. Will a 5x5 LTE connection in the 2.5Ghz band give faster throughput than the same link in the 1900 PCS band? And if the higher frequency gives more throughput how much higher is that throughput?

 

Higher frequency does not provide more or faster throughout for the same size channel, regardless whether it is 700MHz or 2600MHz.

 

What causes Clearwire's TD-LTE 2600 to be considerably faster than Sprint's LTE 1900 or LTE 800 is that it is being deployed in a 20MHz TDD channel, versus a 5MHz FDD channel.  And the reason why 2600 has more capacity than 800 is just simple because of site spacing is much tighter and wider channels.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Higher frequency does not provide more or faster throughout for the same size channel, regardless whether it is 700MHz or 2600MHz.

 

What causes Clearwire's TD-LTE 2600 to be considerably faster than Sprint's LTE 1900 or LTE 800 is that it is being deployed in a 20MHz TDD channel, versus a 5MHz FDD channel.  And the reason why 2600 has more capacity than 800 is just simple because of site spacing is much tighter and wider channels.

 

Robert

Would you mind sharing the site spacing and channel width for 800, 1900 and 2500? Or provide a link. In the mean time i'll be diligently googleing for answers myself. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Higher frequency does not provide more or faster throughout for the same size channel, regardless whether it is 700MHz or 2600MHz.

 

What causes Clearwire's TD-LTE 2600 to be considerably faster than Sprint's LTE 1900 or LTE 800 is that it is being deployed in a 20MHz TDD channel, versus a 5MHz FDD channel. And the reason why 2600 has more capacity than 800 is just simple because of site spacing is much tighter and wider channels.

 

Robert

 

 

Would you mind sharing the site spacing and channel width for 800, 1900 and 2500? Or provide a link. In the mean time i'll be diligently googleing for answers myself. Thanks.

You won't find the answer of site spacing on any frequency as there are too many factors, terrain, site height, downtilt, antenna beamwidth, etc.

 

Digiblur is right. 2600 will max out around 5 miles, 1900 around 8-9 miles, 800 around 13-15 in flat, unobstructed, line of sight conditions with zero downtilt. However, every cell/sector is enginnered for capacity, terrain and physical obstructions and there is no typical size. The make them as large as they can realistically serve. Sometimes that is 2 blocks, sometimes it's more than 12 miles.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much of the 2500 spectrum does clearwire have?

 

Varies widely depending on region. Anywhere from  40 to over 100 mhz of BRS / EBS depending on local leases and ownership. Typically 40 mhz of BRS nationwide though (correct me AJ)..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Higher frequency does not provide more or faster throughout for the same size channel, regardless whether it is 700MHz or 2600MHz.

 

What causes Clearwire's TD-LTE 2600 to be considerably faster than Sprint's LTE 1900 or LTE 800 is that it is being deployed in a 20MHz TDD channel, versus a 5MHz FDD channel.  And the reason why 2600 has more capacity than 800 is just simple because of site spacing is much tighter and wider channels.

 

Robert

 

 

In single antenna situations you are right. However higher frequencies can accomodate higher order MIMO that lower frequencies. 4x4 MIMO might not be possible at 700MHz but it is definitely possible at 2.5Ghz. Actually 8x4 is possible at 2.5GHz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In single antenna situations you are right. However higher frequencies can accomodate higher order MIMO that lower frequencies. 4x4 MIMO might not be possible at 700MHz but it is definitely possible at 2.5Ghz. Actually 8x4 is possible at 2.5GHz.

 

That is true, but when posters have to ask this question about higher frequency and greater capacity, I guarantee that they are not well versed in MIMO.  They are physics newbies.  So, we are talking about one spatial channel, which conforms to the Shannon capacity equation -- the entry image to all of my science/engineering focused articles.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-347-whats-the-frequency-kenneth-interpreting-your-engineering-screen-part-two/

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is true, but when posters have to ask this question about higher frequency and greater capacity, I guarantee that they are not well versed in MIMO.  They are physics newbies.  So, we are talking about one spatial channel, which conforms to the Shannon capacity equation -- the entry image to all of my science/engineering focused articles.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-347-whats-the-frequency-kenneth-interpreting-your-engineering-screen-part-two/

 

AJ

 

Mostly my first question stemmed from a momentary lapse in brain function. I'm familiar with carrier aggregation and have actually read both of your "whats the frequency" posts. A question about those I have is that when I look at my EVDO engineering screen its showing that I'm on Band Class 3 and Channel 2262. What's Band Class 3? 

 

KWvEvha.png?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me guess, have you switched over from the HTC EVO LTE to the HTC One?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet again you have proven yourself a wizard in my eyes. Can you explain your impressive grasp of the situation?

 

The HTC One, sadly, has a broken EV-DO engineering screen.  My guess is that it is due to the loss of SVDO.  But CDMA1X and LTE engineering screens work properly.  So, the EV-DO engineering fields do not present valid data.  Band class 3, by the way, is limited to Japan.  And I trust that you are not in Japan.  Plus, the Sprint variant HTC One does not support band class 3 anyway.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The HTC One, sadly, has a broken EV-DO engineering screen.  My guess is that it is due to the loss of SVDO.  But CDMA1X and LTE engineering screens work properly.  So, the EV-DO engineering fields do not present valid data.  Band class 3, by the way, is limited to Japan.  And I trust that you are not in Japan.  Plus, the Sprint variant HTC One does not support band class 3 anyway.

 

AJ

Funnily enough I looked up band 3 and saw that it was for Japan. So I assumed one of three things. 1) I messed up. 2) The phone messed up 3) I had teleported without my knowledge. Thanks for clearing stuff up. So MIMO will be workable within carrier bands. And if I'm not mistaken carrier aggregation is having MIMO using connections from separate bands?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So MIMO will be workable within carrier bands. And if I'm not mistaken carrier aggregation is having MIMO using connections from separate bands?

 

Carrier aggregation is using multiple bands yes, also keep in mind that aggregate air link backhaul should also be considered as this will bolster overall capacity especially for microwave sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little off topic, my apology in advance but is there a way to see the sid for LTE? My GS3 only shows the 1X sid regardless of where my LTE signal comes from. I use cdma field test to see the info.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little off topic, my apology in advance but is there a way to see the sid for LTE? My GS3 only shows the 1X sid regardless of where my LTE signal comes from. I use cdma field test to see the info.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

There are no SIDs used, only mcc mnc for the US. You can see the site identity using the LTE engineering screens. Look at my signature for more info.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A little off topic, my apology in advance but is there a way to see the sid for LTE? My GS3 only shows the 1X sid regardless of where my LTE signal comes from. I use cdma field test to see the info.

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

 

There are no SIDs used, only mcc mnc for the US. You can see the site identity using the LTE engineering screens. Look at my signature for more info.

I looked at the engineering screen but had no clue what any of it meant. Thanks for the info

 

Right now I have 310 - 120

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

A little off topic, my apology in advance but is there a way to see the sid for LTE? My GS3 only shows the 1X sid regardless of where my LTE signal comes from. I use cdma field test to see the info.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are no SIDs used, only mcc mnc for the US. You can see the site identity using the LTE engineering screens. Look at my signature for more info.

I looked at the engineering screen but had no clue what any of it meant. Thanks for the info

 

 

 

Right now I have 310 - 120

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

That is the sprint ID. The serving cell will be the sector you are on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • The S21U was very spotty with connecting to 6E. It would only see it on a router reboot. I thought it was more the router than the S21U, however my laptop would solidly connect to the 6E network, so it must have been the S21U. Since I'm on WiFi7 with the S24U, I haven't kept track of it. I will flip over and check it out later. 
    • Wi-fi 6e missing (6 GHz on one of two ultras). Perhaps coming from an app?  Wifi analyzer can see the 6ghz, just can't see them to connect.  May try wifi reset, although communications reset could have been the source of this problem.  Others have reported it, so not an isolated issue. Edit: Fixed: Rebooted into safe mode. Wifi 6e worked. Normal boot back. No wifi 6e in available nerworks.  Unistalled Asus Router app. Checked for Wifi 6e being visible in wifi available networks. Nothing. Deleted Netgear Genie app. Then saw networks. of mine I had not connected to in wifi available networks. Forgot the desired 2.4&5&6 SSID that did not show 6E. Connected to it again. 6e now works.
    • I noticed today while I was out and about in Louisville that b30 has been widened back to 10x10. They reduced it to 5x5 back in Sept 2018 presumably due to satellite radio interference. Not sure how long ago the change happened but it couldn't have been too terribly long ago. I noticed the different earfcn in the neighbor list, I don't usually see b30 as pcc much but I wonder if that will change now. I locked my phone to b30 only on my drive home from work and noticed the new(old?) earfcn on every site, so it wasn't just a 1 or 2 site fluke. It also looks like they've been doing some fiber or other cabling work around the b2/b46 small cell nodes, I wonder if they are about to start adding c-band radios to those. 
    • Should trade it for some low-band there or elsewhere. AT&T dominates lowband.    
    • I checked existing spectrum holdings and selling 5x5 PCS to each of VZW and AT&T in Kauai would get them to 20x20 apiece there, which should make them happy. In Maui it makes more sense to sell 5x5 each of PCS and AWS to get VZW 20x20 AWS and AT&T 15x15 PCS. I figure it would be a sale rather than a swap, as neither of the other two have spectrum T-Mobile would want that's high-frequency enough to avoid the spectrum screen. Honestly, T-Mobile is strong enough in Hawaii from a capacity perspective that cutting down PCS/AWS holdings won't hurt, particularly in exchange for finally unlocking 2.5 (though in Maui I saw 140 MHz n41 regularly in September if I remember correctly).
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...