Jump to content

Original EVO or Galaxy S III have better signal strength


Dudersup
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have a friend that upgraded from an original htc evo to a galaxy s3. When you look at the coverage map it shows that he is on fair coverage but really close to "good" coverage. He said his Evo worked just fine at home but his s3 will continually drop calls and does not have enough signal strength.

 

Is there a difference between the frequencies that these two devices operate on and the signal strength that either is able to pull?

 

Any thoughts would be helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both phones function on Sprint's PCS 1900MHz spectrum. Additionally, the Galaxy SIII also can connect to CDMA 800 MHz (former Nextel's iDEN ESMR band, not to be confused with Celluar 850Mhz). What could be happening is the phone is trying to connect to a tower broadcasting at 800 but the signal is not the best it can be. Also the dropped calls could be a handoff issue between 800 and 1900. I know I have had call drops in areas with fringe 800.

 

I hope this is a bit helpful. I am sure others can provide even more useful information (and probably even more accurate and detailed)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both phones function on Sprint's PCS 1900MHz spectrum. Additionally, the Galaxy SIII also can connect to CDMA 800 MHz (former Nextel's iDEN ESMR band, not to be confused with Celluar 850Mhz). What could be happening is the phone is trying to connect to a tower broadcasting at 800 but the signal is not the best it can be. Also the dropped calls could be a handoff issue between 800 and 1900. I know I have had call drops in areas with fringe 800. I hope this is a bit helpful. I am sure others can provide even more useful information (and probably even more accurate and detailed)

What you are saying makes sense. But what would be different about the Evo that is giving better results? I mean I can see why calls might drop by switching between 800 and 1900. Does the Evo just connect through one of these and not both, therefore no handoff resulting in lost call?

Edited by Dudersup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In S4GRU device testing, the GS3 scored better in RF performance than the old generation EVO and much better than the EVO LTE. However, it is possible that it could be an issue with his specific GS3.

 

If he is figuring his signal strength on bars alone, that is problematic. Bars are poor indicators of exact signal strength as each OEM configures what they mean differently. So 3 bars on an EVO may equal one on a GS3...etc.

 

He should get an app called SignalCheck created by a S4GRU member. It will tell him exactly what his signal level is on each device.

 

Most likely as pointed out above, the GS3 has 800MHz capability. If they recently deployed 800MHz service at a distant site, it could cause him to experience what he has. The more distant 800 could have a weaker signal than nearby 1900. Also calls handing off between 800 and 1900 sites are more likely to drop.

 

A PRL update may help because the newest PRL prioritize 800 and 1900 the same. Some of the previous Android PRL's prioritized 800 higher.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In S4GRU device testing, the GS3 scored better in RF performance than the old generation EVO and much better than the EVO LTE. However, it is possible that it could be an issue with his specific GS3.If he is figuring his signal strength on bars alone, that is problematic. Bars are poor indicators of exact signal strength as each OEM configures what they mean differently. So 3 bars on an EVO may equal one on a GS3...etc.He should get an app called SignalCheck created by a S4GRU member. It will tell him exactly what his signal level is on each device.Most likely as pointed out above, the GS3 has 800MHz capability. If they recently deployed 800MHz service at a distant site, it could cause him to experience what he has. The more distant 800 could have a weaker signal than nearby 1900. Also calls handing off between 800 and 1900 sites are more likely to drop.A PRL update may help because the newest PRL prioritize 800 and 1900 the same. Some of the previous Android PRL's prioritized 800 higher.Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Thank you Robert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In S4GRU device testing, the GS3 scored better in RF performance than the old generation EVO and much better than the EVO LTE. However, it is possible that it could be an issue with his specific GS3.If he is figuring his signal strength on bars alone, that is problematic. Bars are poor indicators of exact signal strength as each OEM configures what they mean differently. So 3 bars on an EVO may equal one on a GS3...etc.He should get an app called SignalCheck created by a S4GRU member. It will tell him exactly what his signal level is on each device.Most likely as pointed out above, the GS3 has 800MHz capability. If they recently deployed 800MHz service at a distant site, it could cause him to experience what he has. The more distant 800 could have a weaker signal than nearby 1900. Also calls handing off between 800 and 1900 sites are more likely to drop.A PRL update may help because the newest PRL prioritize 800 and 1900 the same. Some of the previous Android PRL's prioritized 800 higher.Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Is the signal check app on the Play Store by Blue Line computing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the signal check app on the Play Store by Blue Line computing?

Yes.  Very good app.

There is a FREE one.  However, the Pro version is much better if you really want to get into watching things.  Well worth the price.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.  Very good app.There is a FREE one.  However, the Pro version is much better if you really want to get into watching things.  Well worth the price.

I only see the Pro version on the play store. I would like to try it out. Where is the free one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only see the Pro version on the play store. I would like to try it out. Where is the free one?

I think it was pulled off of Google play to fix an issue that was plaguing a particular phone type.

I thought it was back after being updated but maybe not.   The paid version is only $1.99 if I remember correctly and it is superior to the free version.

If the free version is not there, keep looking as it will be back.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I only see the Pro version on the play store. I would like to try it out. Where is the free one?

 

 

I think it was pulled off of Google play to fix an issue that was plaguing a particular phone type.

I thought it was back after being updated but maybe not. The paid version is only $1.99 if I remember correctly and it is superior to the free version.

If the free version is not there, keep looking as it will be back.

Thanks guys! Yes, I took the free version down for a few days last week because of a bug I could not get fixed.. it was fixed and updated over the weekend. Should be all set now.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Sounds like an awesome project—keep us posted on how it’s going! Also—if you’re able to figure out logging, I can work with you to get the data uploaded to SignalCheck. 
    • Yesterday, I saw a post on Facebook from an old friend about the Evolve III Maestro, a $60 laptop (at Micro Center) that apparently has an LTE modem in it.  Specifically, the Quectel EC25-AF*.  The nearest Micro Center was sold out of new ones, but offered open box at $48.  So for $51 after tax, I walked out this morning with one.  An absolute steal. I backed up the Windows product key and then put Kubuntu 22.04 on it.  I spent a lot of time today trying to get the build tools installed so I could get the wifi module installed and running, and once I did that, I pretty quickly got to sending it modem commands, which I've never done before.  I don't have a SIM in it yet, but it does seem to function as it should.  (I figured out the command to get Timing Advance values out of it, but without a SIM, I doubt it would have such values.) Now I'm trying to puzzle out how to write some kind of script or small program to use it for logging purposes.  I think I've worked out how to send commands to it from bash using socat, but I need to pick specific commands to run.  I'd actually like to replace some of my phones with this if I can get it to record cells, with GPS, and cycle through a set of bands repeatedly.  My current phone collection consists of 9 phones other than my main S21FE, and they require babysitting while I'm logging.  It'd be nice to pare that down to a more reasonable number and let the computer do the work, hopefully in the back seat with less babysitting. - Trip ===== * Per the spec sheet, it supports B2/4/5/12/13/14/66/71.  That'd cover all of Verizon and US Cellular LTE, all but B29/30 on AT&T, and all but B41 and Sprint Keep on B26 for T-Mobile. 
    • More bizarre.  I just updated my other Ace without issue. - Trip  
    • Looking over the data so far, bidders can go back and reopen bidding on licenses that appeared settled. In the list below, not all counties are listed and only states with excess demand.  Typically 3 licenses per county for rural areas and some urban areas. Here is how many licenses per state had demand greater than supply: State count AK 3 AL 14 AR 3 AS 6 AZ 9 CA 12 CO 76 DE 6 FL 10 GA 66 GU 3 HI 3 IA 99 ID 47 IL 39 IN 43 KS 231 KY 23 LA 14 MA 5 MD 16 ME 1 MI 86 MN 9 MO 79 MP 12 MS 73 MT 69 NC 26 ND 109 NE 18 NH 13 NJ 6 NM 51 NV 24 NY 13 OH 29 OK 9 OR 30 PA 24 PR 25 SC 20 SD 83 TN 76 TX 236 UT 49 VA 22 VT 5 WA 65 WI 59 WV 26 WY 29
    • Looks like Dish has already taken back the 5x5 of n71 they leased to T-Mobile, and instead of narrowing NR here T-Mobile has gone for broke and made 600 NR-only. They can afford to do that here thanks to B12, and don't need to do that west of here because they weren't leasing 600 from Dish. Does mean that Dish is 10x10 for n71 here (which explains the 30ish Mbps upload peak I saw yesterday). Darned speculators hogging the remainder of the band So T-Mobile is running 140 + 15x15 MHz sub-6 NR here. AT&T is 40 + 15-45x15-45 (15x15 n5, occasional 15x15 DSS on n2 and/or n66 though I haven't seen both in the same area). VZW is 60 + 15x15, with the latter being n2 DSS. Wonder how soon VZW will try n48.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...