Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Buffalo Market


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

Very disappointed in the lack of any recent upgrades in the area. The optimist in me, however, is hoping that one day soon we'll see a wave of site acceptances and get more widespread 4G...

i hope your right... but i doubt it... i was thinking that when i left there would be widespread 4g in buffalo when i came back for christmas break... not the case.... very little progress (except south towns)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well thats new... Dunkirk and i think its jamestown in the south of the market have officially launched.. Thats nice! Especially because i know Dunkirk/ fredonia state college did not even have 3g now they have 3g and 4g.. Go Sprint!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well thats new... Dunkirk and i think its jamestown in the south of the market have officially launched.. Thats nice! Especially because i know Dunkirk/ fredonia state college did not even have 3g now they have 3g and 4g.. Go Sprint!!

Yup this is true. South is filling up pretty nicely with lte. Now they just have to work on North Buffalo and the inner Metro areas next, Although I feel those will be last

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mina, NY is "officially" a market that has launched? I've never even heard of that town. Certainly not of similar size to Dunkirk or Jamestown. Or even Olean which has had a bunch of LTE installed too. But, good for the southern tier at any rate!

 

I find it oddly peculiar that zero acceptances have been done in Niagara County.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mina, NY is "officially" a market that has launched? I've never even heard of that town. Certainly not of similar size to Dunkirk or Jamestown. Or even Olean which has had a bunch of LTE installed too. But, good for the southern tier at any rate!

 

I find it oddly peculiar that zero acceptances have been done in Niagara County.

I was wondering the same thing..although I was in Niagara Falls this past weekend and had fairly unusual 3G speeds of 1.6-2.2mbps which in my mind only means im connecting to a 3G Accepted NV site because I usually roam close to the boarder. I guess it just depends on what the priority is. Rochester has almost complete NV 3G upgrades done but only like 3 towers that have LTE. All of NY seems to be blowing up with LTE so hopefully it wont be long before we see LTE in the Inner cities like NF and Buffalo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanted to let everyone know about the Jamestown area.

 

4G was spotty, at best up until about a week ago, when both speed and signal strength went WAY up (so much so that I get better speed from 4G than from WiFi in my own apartment).  Some areas of Lakewood (just to the west) are also 4G, but the network there is acting the way downtown did through much of last month, so I expect it to be up and running full-time by mid-January.  Areas to the east and south of the city, however, remain stubbornly 2G, with a few spots of 3G, as is a small gap between Jamestown and Lakewood on Fairmount Avenue.  As I haven't been very far north of downtown lately, I am unable to report about the area near and north of I-86.

 

If you take a look at the map at Sensorly, you'll see a nice blob of purple.  Probably 90% of that is from my phone.

 

I'll keep everyone advised as the network expands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No service where I normally get full signal with 2-3 mbps over 3G. They say they are working on 4G and it should be done by the 12th. Should I expect to have 4G LTE around that date. This is in Lockport, NY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't checked in Lockport (I drive through on the way to work), but for whatever reason, Medina has solid 4G LTE now.  I think the tower is near the corner of Salt Works Rd and Rt. 31.  I get 5 bars inside the building where I work (not far from the tower), and the last speed check showed 19.25 Mbps download, 3.35 Mbps upload, 67 ms ping on 12/31/13. The speed is very noticeable!  I wish we'd get LTE in North Tonawanda where I live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely found a new NV tower in lewiston. Second one this week. Very exciting. I cannot believe how fast it feels on 3G with those lower ping times. This has definitely been worth the wait. I was streaming music and buffering between songs was less than 3 seconds. Very impressive. I'll upload a screenshot later when I'm home.  :tu:  :tu:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4OPYmSyl.pngI was going to take pictures of the tower as well, but I don't have a camera other than my phone that can take good pictures in the dark. I believe this is a new tower that must have gone up rather quickly because I frequent this area and do not remember seeing the tower nor these speeds. Either way very happy that network vision is starting to pop up all over my town :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't checked in Lockport (I drive through on the way to work), but for whatever reason, Medina has solid 4G LTE now. I think the tower is near the corner of Salt Works Rd and Rt. 31. I get 5 bars inside the building where I work (not far from the tower), and the last speed check showed 19.25 Mbps download, 3.35 Mbps upload, 67 ms ping on 12/31/13. The speed is very noticeable! I wish we'd get LTE in North Tonawanda where I live.

We were supposed to have it tomorrow. It might take longer. Right now I get about 2 down 1 up and 100 ping with 6 bars 3g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were supposed to have it tomorrow. It might take longer. Right now I get about 2 down 1 up and 100 ping with 6 bars 3g

Where did you hear that timeline from? I haven't seen any updates suggesting that lockport is supposed to have 4G BY tomorrow... As many have said before you can't really trust the reps at sprint for accurate information regarding the lte timeline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point about the reps. They said around today. They said thats why service was so bad a week ago. I was in Shelby on the 3rd. I didn't see any lte after I got to my Grandparents. I wasn't really looking either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At work I have a data connection from about -90dbm to -100dbm. When lte gets turned on whichever tower I'm connected to will my lte signal be at about the same dbm range? And if it is will I even notice much of a speed increase? Because I know lte is more fragile than evdo. What is the "cutoff" in dbm so to speak of lte being unusable?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I want LTE everywhere here in Buffalo, the one tower I hope gets upgraded soon is the one on Meyer Rd in Amherst, by the 290/990 interchange. That's the one nearest where I work. I really hope Sprint gets a move on with upgrades within the 290-90-190 loop...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like the weather has been playing a huge factor in how long its taking to get towers upgraded. Really no known upgrades in weeks. And since IBEZ holds us back in terms of LTE 800 does anyone know if we will be getting the other 2 bands (1900,2500mhz) to cover the area or just 1900?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like the weather has been playing a huge factor in how long its taking to get towers upgraded. Really no known upgrades in weeks. And since IBEZ holds us back in terms of LTE 800 does anyone know if we will be getting the other 2 bands (1900,2500mhz) to cover the area or just 1900?

 

You will get both.  First Band 25 (1900), then Band 41 (2600).  Sprint has committed to building out Band 41 LTE in the Top 100 markets in two year.  They are starting that work in the 2nd quarter this year.  Since the Buffalo/Niagara area is the 49th largest market in the U.S. it is slated to get Band 41.

 

Additionally, the Buffalo market will likely get Band 26 (800) eventually.  Once an agreement can be reached with the Canadians about sharing, Sprint will likely be able to deploy a 3MHz LTE channel there.  It won't win any speed awards.  But it will allow for some extra capacity and the ability to get an LTE signal in hard to cover places inside buildings and at the edge of service.  I think the earliest this could happen in your market is at least 2 more years though.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will get both.  First Band 25 (1900), then Band 41 (2600).  Sprint has committed to building out Band 41 LTE in the Top 100 markets in two year.  They are starting that work in the 2nd quarter this year.  Since the Buffalo/Niagara area is the 49th largest market in the U.S. it is slated to get Band 41.

 

Additionally, the Buffalo market will likely get Band 26 (800) eventually.  Once an agreement can be reached with the Canadians about sharing, Sprint will likely be able to deploy a 3MHz LTE channel there.  It won't win any speed awards.  But it will allow for some extra capacity and the ability to get an LTE signal in hard to cover places inside buildings and at the edge of service.  I think the earliest this could happen in your market is at least 2 more years though.

 

Robert

How about the Rochester, NY market with 800? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...