Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Upper Central Valley Market (Sacramento, Stockton, Redding, Eureka & Reno/Lake Tahoe)


iwalkthrowwalls

Recommended Posts

At least were seeing progress after  pretty much a year of nothing going on.

 

More work done in the market in the past 3-4 months than the previous 9 before it and its only going to speed up now with more crews available to work and Sprint being the only one with any meaningful work for the next 3-4 months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was chilling in Roseville up Eureka last night and the 3G was great for streaming Youtube for a few clips I wanted to show, then the phone found a 4G signal that must have been from another tower much farther away and the streaming ability fell on its face lol.

 

I guess this may be a good reason no to have spotty 4G here and there, especially when the 3G is NV and actually good now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally receiving 4G lte in Stockton ... just east of West lane and alpine in the newer subdivision. That was the longest 3 months I have ever experienced.

If you go on the sponsor section There a couple of more towers I need help on mapping in Stockton with exact tower locations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stockton 4G is up!... And it's gone is there a way to force the phone to stick to 4G?

Lte only mode. I wouldn't recommend it since only a handful of towers are live,

 

They're testing the one in French camp as I write this. I'm getting lte on my iPad mini. I expect this tower to go live this upcoming week if not this weekend.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lte only mode. I wouldn't recommend it since only a handful of towers are live,

 

They're testing the one in French camp as I write this. I'm getting lte on my iPad mini. I expect this tower to go live this upcoming week if not this weekend.

Ah ok I see that now

Am i right to suspect Stockton was only cluster launched for 800 and thankfully a tower maybe two jumped to lte as "testing"? Or this lte cluster launch which will slowly trickle out to a solid network over the next few months?

Edited by mrcupofcoffee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ok I see that now

Am i right to suspect Stockton was only cluster launched for 800 and thankfully a tower maybe two jumped to lte as "testing"? Or this lte cluster launch which will slowly trickle out to a solid network over the next few months?

NO. A cluster launch is a complete activation of all physical equipment for all related cdma technologies 1x or evdo. LTE trickles in as backhaul is available.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO. A cluster launch is a complete activation of all physical equipment for all related cdma technologies 1x or evdo. LTE trickles in as backhaul is available.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

So once an area gets cluster launched with LTE, are the speeds realized then the "best they will get?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So once an area gets cluster launched with LTE, are the speeds realized then the "best they will get?"

Cluster launches are not correlated with LTE.  LTE sites can be brought up at any time. The same cannot be said for 1x800/evdo.  If they upgrade one of these sites without doing others in the area, you risk dropped calls.  This is why they cluster launch areas; you upgrade all of them at the same time so you don't run into that problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cluster launches are not correlated with LTE. LTE sites can be brought up at any time. The same cannot be said for 1x800/evdo. If they upgrade one of these sites without doing others in the area, you risk dropped calls. This is why they cluster launch areas; you upgrade all of them at the same time so you don't run into that problem.

Thanks for the explanation. I have had some dropped calls lately which are attributed to this, I'm sure. I've also had another issue too where it takes 30 seconds for the phone to place a call, meaning I hit the "call" button to place the call and it literally takes 30 seconds before the phone starts to ring. What could the issue be there, and it's not a busy tower/network issue??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting 2Mbit from Sierra College this morning on 3G... That is an improvement. Any word on any changes going on or is it just because Summer School classes are sort of out right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea how long that'll take?

 

As long as it takes. 

 

 

Cool. I'll keep an eye open on their progress. I ended up having to drop sprint because I needed phone and data service but if they can get it together and have decent coverage, and still keep offering unlimited plans, then I'll come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the explanation. I have had some dropped calls lately which are attributed to this, I'm sure. I've also had another issue too where it takes 30 seconds for the phone to place a call, meaning I hit the "call" button to place the call and it literally takes 30 seconds before the phone starts to ring. What could the issue be there, and it's not a busy tower/network issue??

Not sure about the length of time it takes to place a call, but keep in mind that the dropped call issue only has a chance of occurring when you go from an area that is cluster launched to an area that is not, or vice versa.  Any dropped calls besides that are just because the network sucks :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure about the length of time it takes to place a call, but keep in mind that the dropped call issue only has a chance of occurring when you go from an area that is cluster launched to an area that is not, or vice versa. Any dropped calls besides that are just because the network sucks :/

I have 1 or 2 areas that I know I'll always get a dropped call, I'm not concerned about that. The issue I mentioned above occurs in Elk Grove (cluster launched) and in parts of Sacramento (not cluster launched). I can't say this only occurs when I call to another carrier, it sometimes even happens to a landline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...