Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Upper Central Valley Market (Sacramento, Stockton, Redding, Eureka & Reno/Lake Tahoe)


iwalkthrowwalls

Recommended Posts

Seeing good speeds in morning @ 24 hr fitness elk grove florin. It's early morning but usually it's around 300 kbps

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk 2

Look like upgraded backhaul is in place from the site that serves you. Now the wait begins for the lte integration technicians.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look like upgraded backhaul is in place from the site that serves you. Now the wait begins for the lte integration technicians.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Yep, when you suddenly have super fast 3G after a cluster launches, it's a good indication that it will get LTE soon. ;)

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could live without LTE if only I got those NV 3G numbers.

 2.5Mbit on 3G would be a dream. (and is a whole 1Mbit faster than my home itself...) I hate how everything for phones points to use WiFi for better internet!!!*** when uh, not all of us have actually better home internet wifi then our cell service. :cry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its strange, ever since you said that Elk Grove has launched, my 1x/Data have been going bananas. I keep connecting to 1xRTT and then it drops and I switch over to 1x800 and on either one my mobile data doesn't work. I'm in South Sac bordering Elk Grove =/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got 4g lte on my phone for the first time ever at my home. Im in South sac near elk grove florin and gerber. Speed was slow but first sign of progress for me.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got 4g lte on my phone for the first time ever at my home. Im in South sac near elk grove florin and gerber. Speed was slow but first sign of progress for me.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

This gives me hope, I'm by Bruceville and Cosumnes and i'm pulling the worst speeds ever but decent pings Lol, i get 1x800 but my data is around 150-200 ping and 2.4kbps. Or it just tells me data call failure or if I try to make a call it says Network Communication failure or something. Things usually go really bad then good, hope its true for this situation. Also do you mind posting a screenshot of your LTE from your S3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found a nice LTE pocket way out in Rancho, past the golf course. 

 

attachicon.gifscreenshot_1395940788529.jpg

If it's one of the two out off of Hwy 16/Jackson Hwy then it's a tower that has been active for quite a while. They have great speeds out in Mather. The speeds have been bumped up in the past several months I noticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got 4g lte on my phone for the first time ever at my home. Im in South sac near elk grove florin and gerber. Speed was slow but first sign of progress for me.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

I got LTE today as well in 2 very different, opposite parts of Elk Grove.

 

1. At my relatives house close to Bond Rd /Bader Rd, and it wouldn't leave LTE until I left that neighborhood. I don't know how to post pics but my speed test was 3.23 down, 1.38 up.  Over the last 2 years I would average .05 down in that neighborhood.

 

2. At my house by Big Horn Blvd / Meadowspring Dr just past Laguna High School. Noticed LTE late last night and then again this afternoon but then switched back to 3G after a few minutes. Speeds were around .50 mb down. This was the first time I've ever seen it light up in this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-34119-139596065361_thumb.jpg

This is my first upload pic . not sure if it will work. All speed tests except for this one did not complete. They got stuck on upload and timed out. Will run more tests this evening

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

attachicon.gifuploadfromtaptalk1395960648883.jpg

This is my first upload pic . not sure if it will work. All speed tests except for this one did not complete. They got stuck on upload and timed out. Will run more tests this evening

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

I got LTE today as well in 2 very different, opposite parts of Elk Grove.

 

1. At my relatives house close to Bond Rd /Bader Rd, and it wouldn't leave LTE until I left that neighborhood. I don't know how to post pics but my speed test was 3.23 down, 1.38 up.  Over the last 2 years I would average .05 down in that neighborhood.

 

2. At my house by Big Horn Blvd / Meadowspring Dr just past Laguna High School. Noticed LTE late last night and then again this afternoon but then switched back to 3G after a few minutes. Speeds were around .50 mb down. This was the first time I've ever seen it light up in this area.

 

 

Need engineering screen pics and signalcheck. It wouldn't surprise me if you had -110+ dBm RSSI signal levels as those speeds are characteristic of that reception level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 
 

 

Need engineering screen pics and signalcheck. It wouldn't surprise me if you had -110+ dBm RSSI signal levels as those speeds are characteristic of that reception level. 

 

 

I just got Signalcheck lite. I'm not sure if this is the right screen or not.

 

Off of Big Horn Blvd/Meadowspring and Brockenhurst Dr on 3/28.

 

See it pop up randomly for 20-30 minutes.

post-18920-0-58396800-1396034298_thumb.png

post-18920-0-85785800-1396034304_thumb.png

post-18920-0-03575800-1396034311_thumb.png

post-18920-0-37892500-1396034316_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely get the weakest speeds in my house compared to my neighborhood. I took a 15 minute walk from my house off of Big Horn Blvd to the Misty Meadow Way tower by Wackman Park in Elk Grove. I was averaging 12-15 mb from the minute I turned the corner of my street right up to reaching the tower. Sorry I don't have the engineering screen.

post-18920-0-24345800-1396062227_thumb.png

post-18920-0-69550600-1396062232_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three sites in elk Grove accepted for 4g along with one in Eldorado Hills. Info available in sponsor area.

 

Also a single lonely site accepted in metro area of city of Sacramento.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis LTE is in the most useless areas right now. There are like 2 quarter mile big spots. Any idea when it's dense everywhere?

 

No. If you don't like how it is right now then feel free to go to another provider.

 

It is up to the contracted backhaul providers to get upgraded backhaul to Sprint sites and the scheduling depends on them. 4G does not go live without upgraded backhaul. Some backhaul contractors are faster than others (see Modesto) and some are slow as hell. It is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I just pulled 24.8 Mbps down and 6.9 up in Elk Grove on my iphone 5. I can't wait for Sprint to finish up SPARK.

In case you don't know, the Spark update won't do anything for an iPhone 5 (except maybe lighten the band when spark devices jump to a different band)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you guys think sprint will ever get better then verizon and at&t in coverage?

No but it'll get close with the recent announcement from the CCA which allows other carriers to use sprints spectrum in return for native coverage and network vision standardized equipment. USCC and a few other regional will add a bunch of coverage for sprint once they get that program up and running.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...