Jump to content

sensorly question


chrysokos

Recommended Posts

I've been using sensorly for a quite a bit, although I've noticed it doesn't overlap existing coverage if better coverage exists at a later date. For example, one tower on a road has been broadcasting LTE for a while. While the signal is strong near the tower, and a deep purple on the map, further down the road it is weaker and a lighter purple. Now, 4 months later, the other tower down the road a few miles is broadcasting LTE and the signal is much stronger because of that. So, if I re-map this area that had a faint purple, it still shows the faint purple on the map, and not the deep purple stronger signal it should be. Anyone else experience this?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to a post by the sensorly people in the sensorly thread, sensorly averages the overlapping data when it is put on the map. So in other words it will take a few times of mapping the overlapping data to bring the average up and darken the purple on the map.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have a Sensorly question too. But more of an Android question.

 

What is the cheapest Sprint LTE Android device that will run Sensorly without issue?

 

The Viper, Mach, GNex or Victory can be purchased on EBay pretty darn cheaply. Just got to look around.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not suggest the GNex though. We have a member even with stock vanilla ROM on his GNex, polluting the maps so much he stopped mapping once he realized it and saw it. Basically it was marking the maps with dark purple no matter if the signal was weak or not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info. Is there any particular version of Android which will or won't run fully functional Sensorly? I saw several on eBay that have 2.3. Is that sufficient?

 

What kind of phone? Trying to think of an LTE phone that has 2.3 still and can't think of any but I could be wrong. How much are you wanting to spend and do you actually want a decent phone or just a low bottom line phone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What kind of phone? Trying to think of an LTE phone that has 2.3 still and can't think of any but I could be wrong. How much are you wanting to spend and do you actually want a decent phone or just a low bottom line phone?

 

Just need a bottom of the barrel Android phone to do mapping with Sensorly and run Netmonitor/Debug/etc. I want to use iPhone as my primary device but Android to use Sensorly on. Would not like to spend more than $100 if I can help it.

 

Can the Viper, Victory, Mach etc be upgraded to a newer version of Android? Or is it best to leave them at 2.3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Victory is a solid little device. Best RF performer of any Sprint Android phone I've ever tested. Even better than the OG Photon.

 

Robert via LG Optimus G using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Victory is a solid little device. Best RF performer of any Sprint Android phone I've ever tested. Even better than the OG Photon.

 

Robert via LG Optimus G using Tapatalk

So, when's that phone comparison article coming up? *poke*

 

For the record, my sister has reported a marked improvement in usability in fringe areas after switching from the Photon to the Galaxy S III

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Why does Sensorly register roaming as it was a Sprint signal?

 

It is deceiving for 3G maps, especially since the speed is limited to 1x when on Verizon and maybe others.

 

It's not limited to 1X, that's only on residential accounts/PRLs.  

 

I did ask Sensorly the same thing and they stated it was to show people where their phone would work.  I think it inflates the actual true network coverage which really distracts from the purpose of Sensorly.  People today are still freaked out about seeing roaming on their phone.  One of my lines asked me this when we were in the city roaming on VZW, I told her to eat it up, they should have signal here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dig, speaking of asking Sensorly (since you seem to have the dev's address), my Sensorly question is....where has he been?  Just curious basically since he doesn't show that he's been around in over a month now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dig, speaking of asking Sensorly (since you seem to have the dev's address), my Sensorly question is....where has he been?  Just curious basically since he doesn't show that he's been around in over a month now.

 

Not sure.  I do know he's been busy busy, not sure on what, maybe other tools for PCMagazine?  I try not to bother him too much and funnel support from here through to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not limited to 1X, that's only on residential accounts/PRLs.  

 

I did ask Sensorly the same thing and they stated it was to show people where their phone would work.  I think it inflates the actual true network coverage which really distracts from the purpose of Sensorly.  People today are still freaked out about seeing roaming on their phone.  One of my lines asked me this when we were in the city roaming on VZW, I told her to eat it up, they should have signal here.  

 

I asked them this two about a year ago, they told me that it doesn't report when roaming, I know this is incorrect though.

 

I think its very wrong of them to do this.

It its roaming, they should have a different colour to indicate so. I don't mean a slightly/almost the same shade of green like Sprint does on their site, which is almost as deceiving.

 

It should be something Green = Sprint coverage, Orange = Roaming coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that Sensorly shows roaming coverage. I just think it should be a different color.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile wins more 5G spectrum over AT&T's objections So now it's official?
    • Just got back from Puerto Rico. I spent a lot of time going around the San Juan metro area, predominantly in Viejo San Juan, Santurce, Isla Verde, and a short stop in University Gardens.  T-Mobile's network still performs as well today as it did when I last tested and in my opinion is the best on the island. n41 is still at 100MHz in most areas though I did record a few areas with only 80MHz. Yesterday the FCC announced that they're finally granting T-Mobile their Auction 108 winnings so we'll probably finally see that increase. They also have 15MHz of n25 and 15MHz of n25 and 15MHz n71. The fastest speed I recorded while there was 922 down and 120 up, presumably aggregating n41+n25 and potentially n71 as well but I wasn't able to confirm that. A couple of things I noticed about their network are that their is a ton of split-sector n25 deployed in San Juan, much like in the U.S. I even noticed some n41 sites that had 4 or more sectors. The weirdest being the site on top of SJU Airport where they have 6 n41 sectors each broadcasting 80MHz of n41. AT&T SIMs roam on LIberty's network but they still treat it as the home network. In my opinion they're the second best network in Puerto Rico. Liberty is still using the AT&T MCC-MNC code and is pretty much coasting on AT&T's network upgrades. They have 10MHz n5 virtually everywhere but I never saw my phone connect to any other 5G bands. Their saving grace was just how much spectrum they have to aggregate across midband and lowband. I'd see combos like 10MHz n5 + 20MHz B2 + 10MHz B66 + 10MHz Band 30 + 5MHz Band 2 and get upwards of 200Mbps. Coverage was slightly worse than T-Mobile in my experience, even indoors which is a surprise given T-Mobile usually struggles a bit indoors due to their macro density. Verizon is roaming on Claro in Puerto Rico just as they have been for years. No idea if there is 5G roaming because I was connected to LTE the entire time. Toggling 5G didn't do anything and both pings and speeds weren't great. Speeds were in the 20-40Mbps range consistently and pings over 200ms. For comparison T-Mobile's pings are in the teens and Liberty pings are in the 40's even when roaming using an AT&T SIM. Claro's network is ok in my experience with nothing really notable about it.  — — — — — Here are some pics of sites that I took:
    • WTB instructed to process all 2.5GHz licenses across the USA. They are only giving up some spectrum in certain markets of Hawaii.
    • Is this just for licenses in Hawaii?
    • Yeah, it basically directs the bureau to proceed with granting the applications in the normal course.  It's no longer being held by the AT&T objection. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...