Jump to content

So...which Sprint phone has the best RF quality?


Recommended Posts

So I don't think there was ever a real answer to the OP's question and now I'm curious too.

 

 

So...which Sprint phone has the best RF quality? Samsung GS3?

 

Possibly... GS3 isn't too good at 850mhz compared to other phones. I would assume the same as 800 too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I think I recognize some of those figures, too.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just to add to the RF thing. Look at the numbers for LTE on the S3 and the Note2. I was in an area today trying to hunt down another LTE active site was seeing in the engineering screen. I kept dropping it on the Note2 as it was very fringe. I couldn't even get the S3 to find it. I could get the Note2 to connect but the speeds were mid range 3gish. Needless to say I was VERY impressed with the Note2 LTE RF performance which doesn't jive with these numbers. But of course these numbers are only part of the puzzle.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just to add to the RF thing. Look at the numbers for LTE on the S3 and the Note2. I was in an area today trying to hunt down another LTE active site was seeing in the engineering screen. I kept dropping it on the Note2 as it was very fringe. I couldn't even get the S3 to find it. I could get the Note2 to connect but the speeds were mid range 3gish. Needless to say I was VERY impressed with the Note2 LTE RF performance which doesn't jive with these numbers. But of course these numbers are only part of the puzzle.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

If I'm not mistaken those are only rf transmit numbers which have no bearing on receive strength, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a direct correlation to the 'RF scores' and radio performance in most of the devices. But there were anomalies.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 on Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's something to think about when considering RF performance... Last week a field tech and I put a GS3, an iPhone 4S and an iPhone 5 side by side, put all 3 of them in test mode and got wildly different RSSI readings. We were standing in front of a legacy toy cell and all 3 phones hashed to the same carrier, so by the nature of the way CDMA functions, all 3 handsets should have the exact same RSSI, which should have been around -40, since we were 12 feet from the antenna.

 

With that being said, the dB level is based on a reference, and if that reference is different between chipsets, the RSSI will be inaccurate.

 

Also keep in mind that different phones hash to different carriers and the pilot power between the carriers can differ.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So based on your speadsheet, the LG Optimus G has the strongest transmitter?

 

Maybe... Not an FCC doc guru, or even baseband guru by any means. It was the numbers listed at which they tested things.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's something to think about when considering RF performance... Last week a field tech and I put a GS3, an iPhone 4S and an iPhone 5 side by side, put all 3 of them in test mode and got wildly different RSSI readings. We were standing in front of a legacy toy cell and all 3 phones hashed to the same carrier, so by the nature of the way CDMA functions, all 3 handsets should have the exact same RSSI, which should have been around -40, since we were 12 feet from the antenna.

 

With that being said, the dB level is based on a reference, and if that reference is different between chipsets, the RSSI will be inaccurate.

 

Also keep in mind that different phones hash to different carriers and the pilot power between the carriers can differ.

 

Good point there about the reference causing the RSSI to be inaccurate....at least for comparison sake between different devices...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...