Jump to content

Where to find number of customers per market?

slowsprint
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

WiWavelength
WiWavelength

VZW 6% AT&T 5% Sprint 4% T-Mobile 4% MetroPCS 40% Ain't Got No Phone 41%     AJ

WiWavelength
WiWavelength

No, it would not make any rants "more valid." Sprint is not rolling out Network Vision based on POPs or market share.   AJ

WiWavelength
WiWavelength

Those places you name are in "Missourah." Enough said.   AJ

bigsnake49 Member Level: LTE Advanced

bigsnake49

Posted
Posted

I was wondering if anyone knew where you could find how many customers Sprint has in each area? I know in some places in the Midwest the Verizon/Alltel merger really consolidated users to a single carrier.

 

Those are extremely confidential numbers. You can get an idea of the relatively size if you can look up the number of blocks of numbers each operator owns in that area. Not accurate but just a ball park estimate. I used to have a link to a website for that info, but I have no idea where it is or whether it is still alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rickie546 Member Level: 4G WiMax

Rickie546

Posted
Posted

I was wondering if anyone knew where you could find how many customers Sprint has in each area? I know in some places in the Midwest the Verizon/Alltel merger really consolidated users to a single carrier.

 

 

 

I Do Have Some Numbers As Of Jan 1, What Market You Looking For?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
irev210 Member Level: 4G WiMax

irev210

Posted
Posted

I Do Have Some Numbers As Of Jan 1, What Market You Looking For?

 

I would love to get a general sense. Can you share general sense of sprint's top markets and lowest markets?

 

Any markets where sprint has more share than verizon or at&t?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Any markets where sprint has more share than verizon or at&t?

 

Yep, Kansas City.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Seeing my market near the top would be great since my no-4G rants would be more valid.

 

No, it would not make any rants "more valid." Sprint is not rolling out Network Vision based on POPs or market share.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

I've always been amazed how Sprint service stops right outside of KC except along major highways. Since they have such a large market share in the region, you think they would cover neighboring towns like Richmond, Lexington, Higginsville, Marshall, etc. People in many communities within 100 miles of KC have to use someone other than their regionally HQ carrier.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

I've always been amazed how Sprint service stops right outside of KC except along major highways. Since they have such a large market share in the region, you think they would cover neighboring towns like Richmond, Lexington, Higginsville, Marshall, etc.

 

Those places you name are in "Missourah." Enough said.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rickie546 Member Level: 4G WiMax

Rickie546

Posted
Posted

I've always been amazed how Sprint service stops right outside of KC except along major highways. Since they have such a large market share in the region, you think they would cover neighboring towns like Richmond, Lexington, Higginsville, Marshall, etc. People in many communities within 100 miles of KC have to use someone other than their regionally HQ carrier.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Robert,

 

Having lived in KC for 90% of my life i have thought the same thing. If it was for the former affiliates Roberts & Southwest, even less of the area would be covered. even areas 30 mins from campus (Louisburg) was not covered till 3-4 years ago (thanks to IDEN synergy site. If these smaller towns around KC where covered, then be well over 30%. Southerwestern Bell (now AT&T) and Cellular One (now verizon) Where the originals to the market back in analog days, So seeing where they are at today, tells you how much they have gained but what more can they get with 800 mhz and a little expansion( Back in September they did have service in Marshall, yet not showing up on maps and customer service says it's not there)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

I say Missourah, and if someone complains to me about it, I switch to Misery. They like that one even less.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

I say Missourah, and if someone complains to me about it, I switch to Misery. They like that one even less.

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lynyrd65 Member Level: 4G WiMax

lynyrd65

Posted
Posted

only have OKC, AT&T has almost 50%! then sprint, t-mobile and verizon in last....

 

Yeah we're a pretty big AT&T area but I do see more and more Sprint converts as of lately. They're probably all switching for the same reason I did, (cheaper than dirt postpaid family smart phone plans and unlimited data).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rickie546 Member Level: 4G WiMax

Rickie546

Posted
Posted

Anything in Louisiana? If you have BR, I'm curious how close I would be with my prediction. ATT - 50%, Verizon - 25%, Sprint - 10%, T-Mobile - 8%, the rest pre-paid

nope have the big easy and it's no where close to what you guessed for Baton rouge

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigzeto Member Level: 3G EVDO

bigzeto

Posted
Posted

nope have the big easy and it's no where close to what you guessed for Baton rouge

 

Yeah, in New Orleans, I'm not sure if any 1 carrier dominates the market. Verizon has made a big push there and I think Sprint has a decent share there as well. In BR though, ATT has this market for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • iansltx
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By iansltx · Posted

      A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • iansltx
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By iansltx · Posted

      Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • iansltx
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By iansltx · Posted

      Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • cooltech6597
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By cooltech6597 · Posted

      Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • JossMan
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By JossMan · Posted

      What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...