Jump to content

Sprint Will Raise $2 Billion In Debt, May Use to Fund Partner Clearwire


jpkjeff

Recommended Posts

(Via Bloomberg)

 

Sprint Will Raise $2 Billion in Debt, May Use to Fund Partner Clearwire

 

By Scott Moritz and Sapna Maheshwari - Feb 27, 2012 5:01 PM CT[/color]

Sprint Nextel Corp. (S), the third- largest U.S. wireless operator, said it plans to sell $2 billion in notes to help pay for refinancing, network upgrades and possible funding for its wireless partnerClearwire Corp. (CLWR)

Sprint will sell notes due in 2017 and 2020 through a private placement, according to a statement today. The sale, to be completed March 1, includes five-year notes at 9.13 percent and eight-year debt, which will be guaranteed by Sprint units, at 7 percent, the Overland Park, Kansas-based company said later in a separate statement included in a regulatory filing.

Sprint raised $4 billion through a debt offering in November to help with network spending and financing for Clearwire. The return trip to capital markets shows Sprint is raising cash to cover the growing costs of upgrading its wireless network to higher-speed technology and selling mobile devices that require subsidies, such as Apple Inc. (AAPL)’s iPhone. Sprint, which has lost money for the last five years, is struggling to compete against larger rivals AT&T Inc. andVerizon Wireless.

MetroPCS Abandoned

 

The move comes after Sprint’s board voted down a possible acquisition of the smallerMetroPCS Communications Inc. (PCS), a person familiar with the plan said last week. The board decided the stock and cash transaction, which may have cost as much as $8 billion including debt, would have been too expensive given the current level of Sprint’s stock price.

Sprint rose 3.2 percent to $2.55 at the close in New York. The stock has dropped 41 percent in the past 12 months.

The carrier has a four-year $15.5 billion commitment to pay Apple for the iPhone and in its annual report filed today, Sprint says it has $29.5 billion in additional payment commitments though 2017.

Sprint is graded B1 with a “negative” outlook by Moody’s Investors Service and an equivalent B+, also with a “negative” outlook by Standard & Poor’s, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

 

The last time Sprint sold eight-year notes was in August 2009, when it issued $1.3 billion of 8.375 percent securities due in August 2017, Bloomberg data show. The debt was assigned a Ba2 from Moody’s at the time.

Today’s eight-year debt is expected to have a Ba3 grade and BB- from S&P, said the person with knowledge of the offering. The five-year debt, which is not guaranteed, is expected to be rated B3 by Moody’s and B+ by S&P, the person said.

 

The securities due August 2017 traded at 98.3 cents on the dollar to yield 8.78 percent as of 1:01 p.m. in New York, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

Edited by jpkjeff
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my editorial/rant, perhaps Roberts article will explain more. Clear needed $600 million to fully convert its network to LTE. Clear gets that amount and then some and will only convert towers at Sprints request to shore up NV/LTE sites. I've been keeping informal track of Clears MVNO/MVNE acquisitions and I'm not seeing a whole lot even though LS2 is practically belly up. Because of the iPhone, Clear is losing revenue since the iPhone doesn't translate into WiMax sales which Clear gets $10/phone.

 

Now Sprint is going back to the debtors market for more cash and I'm pretty sure the majority of it is to prop Clear up for the remainder of the year. Why won't Clear retrofit it's entire network in order to gain more wholesale business? Why is their no mention of Clear cutting back on overhead and expenses? What is Sprint going to do with this blackhole of a business that continues to suck the life out of it?

 

Why, why, why? This doesn't meet any business model I'm aware of, not even one that needs life support. Answer these questions and we'll know if Sprint will survive in its present incarnation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good questions. My article does not explain your points. I wouldn't mind some answers myself.

 

If this money is to fund Clear, 2 Billion just seems like way to much. I thought Clear already had the funding they wanted/needed for their initial LTE plans. Ok.. so maybe their budget is/was a bit off... so give em a few hundred million bucks more... but, 2 Billion? Just seems like a lot. Is there a possibility that there is more to this story then we're hearing? (I'm inclined to believe so.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what the issue here is, is that Sprint has committed that they would give Clearwire all this money since December, but it actually doesn't have the cash to do it. This debt raising just actually is the means to get the money it has already committed to Clearwire. That's what I think.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what the issue here is, is that Sprint has committed that they would give Clearwire all this money since December, but it actually doesn't have the cash to do it. This debt raising just actually is the means to get the money it has already committed to Clearwire. That's what I think.

 

Also note that Sprint has about $1.7 billion in debt due in 2013. Some if not most of the new debt could go towards paying off the existing debt and giving themselves more breathing room. We won't know that until their Q1 financials are released. Whatever they're doing the market seems to like it. Sprint's stock price is up $0.30/share in the last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Also note that Sprint has about 1.7 billion in debt due in 2013. Some if not most of the new debt could go towards paying off the existing debt and giving themselves more breathing room. We won't know that until their Q1 financials are released. Whatever they're doing the market seems to like it. Sprint's stock price is up 0.30/share in the last week.

 

Sprint did say in their press release that the would be using in part some of the proceeds to pay existing debts (in essence refinancing). So this definitely makes sense.

 

Posted via Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would much rather use the 2 billion to help accelerate NV and hire more crews for each of the vendors particularly A/L and Samsung. NV appears to be slow right now because Sprint is focusing on all the large markets first. Once these are done It will be interesting to see how quickly NV progresses once they move onto the secondary markets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...