Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

In the ABQ market playbook, it was always labeled "Ground Mount RRU, No 800" for my site, long before S4GRU was a going concern. So I'm chucking it all up to coincidence.

 

My site is pretty unimportant, all things considered. For me, it's just the convenience of LTE testing. It's not like I need LTE in my home. However, I am concerned about the significant amount of Ground Based RRU's in New Mexico. If all these sites do not get LTE, then that is problematic for Sprint. Especially since Verizon does have their LTE panels on all these sites where they are colocated. Including the one looming over my head.

 

Robert

 

Any reason why they are ground mounting the RUU vs. just going with cabinet based radios like Verizon? Also, if you are ground mounting RUUs, why not just mount one more and run the cable for ESMR as well?

 

In rural locations, it seems like the benefit of ESMR would be the highest.

 

I mean, the low utilization of the more rural sites must just not justify the large capex associated with deploying ESMR?

 

Anywho, that's my guess. I am sure sprint calculated the usage on the tower and can't justify spending the amount of money on the site relative to its utilization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Any reason why they are ground mounting the RUU vs. just going with cabinet based radios like Verizon? Also, if you are ground mounting RUUs, why not just mount one more and run the cable for ESMR as well?

 

In rural locations, it seems like the benefit of ESMR would be the highest.

 

I mean, the low utilization of the more rural sites must just not justify the large capex associated with deploying ESMR?

 

Anywho, that's my guess. I am sure sprint calculated the usage on the tower and can't justify spending the amount of money on the site relative to its utilization.

I hope you are right with the calculated risk. It will be very disappointing if there are many more sites in nm that don't receive lte.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the ABQ market playbook, it was always labeled "Ground Mount RRU, No 800" for my site, long before S4GRU was a going concern. So I'm chucking it all up to coincidence.

 

My site is pretty unimportant, all things considered. For me, it's just the convenience of LTE testing. It's not like I need LTE in my home. However, I am concerned about the significant amount of Ground Based RRU's in New Mexico. If all these sites do not get LTE, then that is problematic for Sprint. Especially since Verizon does have their LTE panels on all these sites where they are colocated. Including the one looming over my head.

 

Robert

 

I am also very concerned that Sprint would still use legacy antennas even if it wasn't deploying LTE. I would still think even if they are just deploying just CDMA 1900 that they would want to use the NV antennas since I am sure there are improvements in tilt and capacity that legacy antennas do not provide. Who knows if in the future the opportunity can present where they can add LTE to this site. For gosh sake's the new NV antennas is capable of 800 and 1900 MHz support while the legacy antennas only support 1900 MHz. I assume its a cost savings issue but I still think its worth the investment in the long term. I can't imagine using legacy antennas for the next decade *shivers*

 

Personally I think Sprint needs to get rid of every single legacy antenna, cabinet, radios, backhaul, etc as if its building an entire cellular network from the ground up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just drove past the tower in eubank in between comanche and Montgomery and there was a work van in front of the tower with the gate open. Hopefully I can go back today or tomorrow to snoop around.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just drove past the tower in eubank in between comanche and Montgomery and there was a work van in front of the tower with the gate open. Hopefully I can go back today or tomorrow to snoop around.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

the tower is EP03AL042 if anyone is curious.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the tower is EP03AL042 if anyone is curious.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

I just checked that one. It is shown as a Stealth site, but not listed as Ground Mount RRU's. So that's good news for you.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I just checked that one. It is shown as a Stealth site, but not listed as Ground Mount RRU's. So that's good news for you.

 

Robert

haha stealth site, the one I saw was clear as day regular tower.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I just checked that one. It is shown as a Stealth site, but not listed as Ground Mount RRU's. So that's good news for you.

 

Robert

do you know approximately how many ground mounted towers there will be in abq?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you know approximately how many ground mounted towers there will be in abq?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

I'll take a few moments and make a market map showing them all for our reference.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you know approximately how many ground mounted towers there will be in abq?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

This is an interesting question. I am wondering as well. I was really looking forward to SMR800 in ABQ especially in Rio Rancho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since these are the sites that have started here in the North, these are the ones also most likely to start around ABQ, too. I see the one in Rio Rancho way out near the end of Unser at US 550 is a ground mount.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be out in Cuba on Tuesday. I will swing by and check that lone site out there slated to be Ground Mount.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be out in Cuba on Tuesday. I will swing by and check that lone site out there slated to be Ground Mount.

 

Robert

That is so weird that there are so many ground mounts, do other markets have similar trends?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is so weird that there are so many ground mounts, do other markets have similar trends?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

I've not done an exhaustive review of other markets, but in my general observations I would say no. For instance, the Kansas market has less than five. And the Kansas market has double the sites of ABQ. The ABQ market has 58 ground mount sites. Almost 20% of all sites in the market. The sites with No 800 are all within the 75 mile international boundary and subject to our agreement with Mexico.

 

I can tell you based on my observations of the Ground Mount sites here in the Los Alamos/Espanola/Santa Fe area, only the Santa Fe Opera, First Baptist Church and the Campground sites cannot support normal mounted RRU's. And the three sites that cannot, are within 30' of the ground and they can be mounted pretty darn close to the panels. In my opinion, they all could support LTE RRU's, if Sprint wanted them to.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've not done an exhaustive review of other markets, but in my general observations I would say no. For instance, the Kansas market has less than five. And the Kansas market has double the sites of ABQ. The ABQ market has 58 ground mount sites. Almost 20% of all sites in the market. The sites with No 800 are all within the 75 mile international boundary and subject to our agreement with Mexico.

 

I can tell you based on my observations of the Ground Mount sites here in the Los Alamos/Espanola/Santa Fe area, only the Santa Fe Opera, First Baptist Church and the Campground sites cannot support normal mounted RRU's. And the three sites that cannot, are within 30' of the ground and they can be mounted pretty darn close to the panels. In my opinion, they all could support LTE RRU's, if Sprint wanted them to.

 

Robert

You should contact them with your findings/suggestions ;) Thanks for the map! So basically, the no 800 sites are tower mounted rrus but just can't have 800 because of the international laws you mentioned?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should contact them with your findings/suggestions ;) Thanks for the map! So basically, the no 800 sites are tower mounted rrus but just can't have 800 because of the international laws you mentioned?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

Yes, that's correct. But Sprint and the Feds are working with Mexico and Canada to allow them to deploy some 800MHz service in those areas.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, that's correct. But Sprint and the Feds are working with Mexico and Canada to allow them to deploy some 800MHz service in those areas.

 

Robert

Thanks for the map. This will help me get to eye the ones that might get work done first.

 

Also the sites along I25 and I40 really don't need 800. I drive I40 (E and W) for work and I really don't have a problem roaming (only spot I roam is before continental divide for some reason).

 

With all this being said, it still concerns me that the ABQ market may not see 800.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the map. This will help me get to eye the ones that might get work done first.

 

Also the sites along I25 and I40 really don't need 800. I drive I40 (E and W) for work and I really don't have a problem roaming (only spot I roam is before continental divide for some reason).

 

With all this being said, it still concerns me that the ABQ market may not see 800.

 

Really? I drop to one and zero bars, or roam short distance on I-40 East between sites. Especially past Santa Rosa. I think this is a prime area for 800MHz deployment. And service in Tucumcari is especially poor.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I drop to one and zero bars, or roam short distance on I-40 East between sites. Especially past Santa Rosa. I think this is a prime area for 800MHz deployment. And service in Tucumcari is especially poor.

 

Yep, if I-40E to the Texas state line is going to be without SMR 800 MHz, Sprint might as well skip LTE 1900 on those sites, too. The Alamosa legacy CDMA1X 1900 coverage on that route is already stretched incredibly thin. LTE 1900 coverage would be like a series of hotspots along the Interstate.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I drop to one and zero bars, or roam short distance on I-40 East between sites. Especially past Santa Rosa. I think this is a prime area for 800MHz deployment. And service in Tucumcari is especially poor.

 

Robert

 

I don't got out past Santa Rosa ever. I did when I was traveling to school but I didn't have a smart phone then. I am curious now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yep, if I-40E to the Texas state line is going to be without SMR 800 MHz, Sprint might as well skip LTE 1900 on those sites, too. The Alamosa legacy CDMA1X 1900 coverage on that route is already stretched incredibly thin. LTE 1900 coverage would be like a series of hotspots along the Interstate.

 

AJ

just does not make sense to have all these ground mounted areas. Seems every tower all the way to cruces along the highway is.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...