Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

I work downtown and this morning speeds were flying. Ran a test and got 70mbs down. It makes me believe that CA is enabled now.

 

Also, I was in uptown and was not connected to band 41 but the second carrier band 25 and I hit 50mbs. I believe they have enabled CA for any location that is possible.

Nice feedback.. the second carrier is now also live in El Paso, TX .. I hope more band 41 go up soon .. sites have been approved for a while now , but no work happening .. I hope they make these market a 6 months project and get it over with

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm so excited to see those iDEN conversion future sites all over the state. Finally Sprint is stating to expand a little!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is a little confusing. Are you talking about Texas or New Mexico?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a little confusing. Are you talking about Texas or New Mexico?

it probably New Mexico .. it gets a bit confusion when a Texas market is in the mix ..idk why El Paso is part of the New Mexico market

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a little confusing. Are you talking about Texas or New Mexico?

I was referring to NM, since the ABQ market covers the entire state of NM but only the city of El Paso. But Texas also has a lot of conversions too so I guess it's for them as well!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it probably New Mexico .. it gets a bit confusion when a Texas market is in the mix ..idk why El Paso is part of the New Mexico market

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Part of me feels like El Paso should have been its own market. With all the issues there are in the Sun City, you'd figure more attention should be given to the area. Especially when you consider El Paso is almost as big as Albuquerque and is also a very important trade port.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of me feels like El Paso should have been its own market. With all the issues there are in the Sun City, you'd figure more attention should be given to the area. Especially when you consider El Paso is almost as big as Albuquerque and is also a very important trade port.

Yup, El Paso is bigger then Albuquerque... El Paso is the 19th largest city in the us population wise .. I don't think sprint will get the network up to par anytime soon here ( just to far behind).....

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was referring to NM, since the ABQ market covers the entire state of NM but only the city of El Paso. But Texas also has a lot of conversions too so I guess it's for them as well!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I guess this is the case for the "Albuquerque" market only, because in East Texas all the Nextel towers are still vacant. There is one tower near me in which T-Mobile recently took over, but that's it. Some of them do have Clearwire panels that were colocated, but they haven't been touched since they fired up LTE. They usually perform very poorly and are almost a non factor in user experience.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, El Paso is bigger then Albuquerque... El Paso is the 19th largest city in the us population wise .. I don't think sprint will get the network up to par anytime soon here ( just to far behind).....

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Totally. Metropolitan area wise, El Paso is still a hair below Albuquerque though. Honestly I'm just glad to see some movement in the entire market even if it's slow. Hopefully more monies, and pressure can be put in this market to keep pushing it!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess this is the case for the "Albuquerque" market only, because in East Texas all the Nextel towers are still vacant. There is one tower near me in which T-Mobile recently took over, but that's it. Some of them do have Clearwire panels that were colocated, but they haven't been touched since they fired up LTE. They usually perform very poorly and are almost a non factor in user experience.

I don't think there has been any​ evidence of actual movement on new towers. It's excitement over the addition of the potential sites on the NV map.

 

Sent from my LG G5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there has been any​ evidence of actual movement on new towers. It's excitement over the addition of the potential sites on the NV map.

 

Sent from my LG G5

Several locations in the east Mnts of ABQ have recently gone live with LTE, as well as some B41 being seen. Even some movement on existing towers is hope!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several locations in the east Mnts of ABQ have recently gone live with LTE, as well as some B41 being seen. Even some movement on existing towers is hope!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sorry, didn't mean to discount those updates, was speaking solely about entirely new towers. I agree that it was refreshing to finally see some movement on LTE and B41 on sites around your marker.

 

Sent from my LG G5

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update in downtown ABQ, pretty packed for a typical Friday night, a few concerts going on, but now that Sprint has B41, it is running spectacularly well. Typically at this time I would be running at about 1-3mbps outside and nothing inside, now a consistent 45 outside, and b26/25 indoors is running around 15-20mbps. Pings around 50 which is little better than my average around the city. Any gathering typically destroys the network here at least the places I go. Perfect time to bring my personal line back to Sprint! Hopefully they can keep it up.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, here's a quick speed test while I stopped to pick my dinner up @ Uptown20e0073c6a6d109228f47f2e3a68d8bb.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wow! And I thought this day would never come!

 

Sent from my SM-T813 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! And I thought this day would never come!

 

Sent from my SM-T813 using Tapatalk

Last week I got 50 MBA down with double the upload you have. I think they activated CA for B25 and 41. Awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't see this EARFCN on the tracking page (39874). Here is what I got on the interstate (I-40/Wyoming). I think it might be coming from EP03AL639 instead of the uptown site, I am going to double check in a few hours. Note 2xCA on the two sites I know of now. 0645d1ad76850f0debc7445b5e5bed7f.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't see this EARFCN on the tracking page (39874). Here is what I got on the interstate (I-40/Wyoming). I think it might be coming from EP03AL639 instead of the uptown site, I am going to double check in a few hours. Note 2xCA on the two sites I know of now.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes getting that earfcn downtown as well. No CA downtown though. Speeds are great on all bands though now. Band 26 is useable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sites so far I've seen B41 at:

Central/Elizabeth (w/CA)

Wyoming, south of Zuni

Lomas/Pennsylvania

San Pedro/Candelaria

Uptown site (w/ CA)

Center Downtown site

I also heard that it's available around the Sunport?

This order is very similar to the original LTE rollout. Order or not, IT'S FINALLY HAPPENING IN ABQ

 

Edit: also, second carrier b25 is pretty much all around the city.

 

Sorry if this is the wrong place for this post, I'll move any specific talk to the other ABQ page

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question, I recently did a speed test at my work and got 61Mbps down, on B25. Can a speed test have an error, or is something else going on?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2nd carrier band 25

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...