Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - South Bay Market (San Jose/Salinas/Monterey)


Xlegendxero

Recommended Posts

Santa Cruz now on the map! I see what sprint did there in time for the holidays. Hohoho

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Yes. Santa Cruz will be in today's update later today. :tu:

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Vallejo is north of San Francisco, and nowhere near the south bay.

 

I lived in Solano County for almost 10 years. We considered ourselves apart of every city in Northern CA. We were part of Sacramento and the Bay Area. Legends in our own minds. Don't you know how important we think we are???

 

;)

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I lived in Solano County for almost 10 years. We considered ourselves apart of every city in Northern CA. We were part of Sacramento and the Bay Area. Legends in our own minds. Don't you know how important we think we are???

 

;)

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Haha Yes very important. We have to stop somewhere on our way to and from the bay to take a piss or get food you know :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey Robert, this is the second week there have been no updates in the South Bay. Are we running into the same problems (difficult sites/permitting) that the SF Bay market is running into, or is there something else you might know of?

 

Thanks for any insight!!

 

Tommy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Robert, this is the second week there have been no updates in the South Bay. Are we running into the same problems (difficult sites/permitting) that the SF Bay market is running into, or is there something else you might know of?

 

Thanks for any insight!!

 

Tommy

 

I have no idea what the issue is. I'll do some asking around and see if I can get some info.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any update on when salinas,ca goes live?

 

No. They are just starting to work in the area. You may have one site in the next 45-60 days. And then each additional one every month or two after that. That's my guess

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

No. They are just starting to work in the area. You may have one site in the next 45-60 days. And then each additional one every month or two after that. That's my guess

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Woo Hooo..... It may not be much , but its a solid answer with a real time line......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone get any LTE near Aromas on the 101? I'm going down to Monterrey tomorrow and I saw there is an accepted LTE tower near there but no one reporting on Sensorly.

 

I've been waiting for that one to appear on Sensorly, or at least someone to report on it. You may be the first. :tu:

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not sure if im going down 17/1 and up 101 or vice versa. I wanna stop by santa cruz for some chocolate bacon. hmmmm. Either way I should hit lte in santa cruz and hopefully aromas. Its been up for a couple of weeks now, I'm surprised no one has hit it yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found out nine sites were accepted in the past few days in the South Bay market. One near Salinas, another near Santa Cruz, one in Mountain View, one in Milpitas, one in Santa Clara, one in Cupertino and three in San Jose. More details in the Sponsor section: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/653-network-vision-site-map-northern-californianevada/page__view__findpost__p__100128

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I drove down 101 today. Didnt get any lte until I was on 156. A good stretch of it too. So not sure if it's the new tower to the south or the one in the north of 156. It's not showing on sensorly. I hope it'll show up tomorrow.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does "near salinas" mean.... Is it north or south or salinas...or are we lucky enough to have it in town?

 

Exact locations are discussed in our Sponsor threads and shown on our Sponsor maps. For more information about how to become a S4GRU Sponsor, you can go to this link: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1195-information-about-s4gru-sponsorship-levels-and-how-to-become-a-sponsor/

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone else did some Salinas too.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

So close to my house! I live 5 min from 68/Reservation off of River RD. I need to get a LTE Android phone so I can help out. I just used my upgrade to get the 5 when it came out. Anybody know where I can pick up a cheap Android LTE phone?

Edited by cuthroat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've been waiting for that one to appear on Sensorly, or at least someone to report on it. You may be the first. :tu:

 

Robert

 

I dont think its live yet. I was right under it and cycled airplane mode and nothing. So i guess i hit that new one in salinas for all of 156. I guess thats why it hasnt shown up om sensorly yet.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is there a massive hole in 4G LTE in south San Jose? Do the poor people not get LTE as quickly? haha

 

Two additional sites went live in that area last week. Sprint contractors work on each site the moment it is available. They don't play favorites with neighborhoods. We see just as many complaints about Sprint starting in poor neighborhoods and ignoring the better demographics. Neither is true.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...