Jump to content

Please Don't Let this happen - Apple buying Sprint


shawn_kc

Recommended Posts

I really don't see anything like this happening anytime soon. Now from a current customer perspective this will really suck as prices will definitely increase without a doubt but at the same time network vision will probably be completed in record time. From an investor perspective this would be the equivalent to hitting the lottery. Seriously, if this were to happen the price of sprints stock will sky rocket like nothing else before it and current shareholders will be very happy, including myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how wild speculators and Sprint haters point to Sprint's market cap of $13.5 billion. "If I just had $14 billion, then I could easily buy Sprint."

 

Back to reality. Does anyone here really think that Sprint could be acquired for less than $25 billion? Heck, AT&T was going to pay a ridiculous $39 billion for T-Mobile, and Sprint is more valuable than is T-Mobile.

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in a few hundred shares of sprint until I got out during the recent peak, but one of the idea's I was hoping to happen would be apple or google buy sprint and use it to further their applicable phone ecosystem.

 

I'm still holding on some clearwire for the same concept, I figure that either sprint, or google/apple will eventually make moves to either buy clwr or their spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how wild speculators and Sprint haters point to Sprint's market cap of $13.5 billion. "If I just had $14 billion, then I could easily buy Sprint."

 

Back to reality. Does anyone here really think that Sprint could be acquired for less than $25 billion? Heck, AT&T was going to pay a ridiculous $39 billion for T-Mobile, and Sprint is more valuable than is T-Mobile.

 

AJ

 

Sprint's net debt is about $15B, so a suitor has to come up with $14B of equity and $15B of debt, so at least $29B. I assume at least 30% premium on top of current price so 1.3*$14B+$15B=$33.2B. Of course they should probably count on another $5B to finish Network Vision.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please NO!

 

As an Android phone fan, that would sux. It would mean I would have to change carriers since I have absolutely NO desire to own an iPhone!

 

KCT - "No Matter Where You Go, There You Are!"

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am no expert in this, but seriously, if Apple were to buy Sprint for whatever price (I think AJ mentioned no less than 29B), that would not be an investment for Apple. The iPhone line is only but a small portion of all the other phones and devices that Sprint offers. What would happen with those devices. If anything, the one that would and could possibly buy Sprint would be the one company that just recently mentioned that they always wanted to be in the hardware business. and that company is Google.

They already have ventured out by buying Motorola and now have cable service out in Kansas. By buying Sprint they will have the last remaining piece of the puzzle. Android OS, Google TV, cable service, a phone hardware division, and a cellular mobile network.

 

it may not be today or tomorrow, but I sense it will happen.

 

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's net debt is about $15B, so a suitor has to come up with $14B of equity and $15B of debt, so at least $29B. I assume at least 30% premium on top of current price so 1.3*$14B+$15B=$33.2B. Of course they should probably count on another $5B to finish Network Vision.

 

Lest we not forget that Sprint's spectrum holdings alone are valued at $20.5 billion, roughly 50 percent higher than Sprint's market cap. PCS A-F, PCS G, and SMR combined, Sprint has a minimum of 30 MHz of spectrum truly nationwide. That cannot be undervalued.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW AT&T has $62B worth of net debt. You don't hear much about that!

 

I think that Sprint just needs to execute on its Vision plan and reduce its roaming bill to a manageable amount like $250M instead of the $1B that it had couple of years ago. If that means that it limits the amount of roaming minutes allowed so be it. If it means that it kicks people off that are in marginal areas, so be it. If it means that it develops its network in said marginal areas, then so be it. They need to improve their margins to match the big two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not convinced Sprint's entire board would even sell for a total price of 33 billion . I think they would be happy to find a sugar daddy and allow a giant share/ cash infusion, but it doesnt seem that they envision a buyout, given NV etc etc etc.

 

And I despise the comment in that article "network overhaul isnt going to cut it" or whatever. Sick of the media spewing misinformation about a project thats like 1.5/38th the way complete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in a few hundred shares of sprint until I got out during the recent peak, but one of the idea's I was hoping to happen would be apple or google buy sprint and use it to further their applicable phone ecosystem.

 

I'm still holding on some clearwire for the same concept, I figure that either sprint, or google/apple will eventually make moves to either buy clwr or their spectrum.

 

There is no way Google will touch Clearwire again. Google just sold their entire stake in Clearwire earlier this year in Feb 2012 and took a 450 million dollar loss on the sale. You can look up on Google..haha...to find reference to this fact. Also Apple would have no interest in Clearwire's 2.5 GHz spectrum since they are not in the wireless business and certainly the 2.5 GHz band alone is NOT what you would start a wireless business anyways.

 

I see only Sprint as a potential buyout candidate for Clearwire since they own about 50% of the company already. Had Sprint been in excellent financial condition right now, I am sure they would have bought out Clearwire by now to secure the 2.5 GHz spectrum assets at such a low price since the Clearwire stock was so heavily deflated 2 weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW AT&T has $62B worth of net debt. You don't hear much about that!

 

I think that Sprint just needs to execute on its Vision plan and reduce its roaming bill to a manageable amount like $250M instead of the $1B that it had couple of years ago. If that means that it limits the amount of roaming minutes allowed so be it. If it means that it kicks people off that are in marginal areas, so be it. If it means that it develops its network in said marginal areas, then so be it. They need to improve their margins to match the big two.

 

Moving the SMR band from iDen to 1x Advanced will definitely cut down on roaming costs :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

more apple buying sprint speculation;

 

http://www.fool.com/...everything.aspx

 

You know what would be really funny, if apple bought sprint, softbank, clearwire and dish.

 

It definitely would give them the content licenses they so desire. Short of acquiring content companies themselves, or producing original content, best way to get some licenses. Not to mention the means of delivering said content.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DoJ would not allow Apple to buy a wireless carrier. The vertical integration of device, content, and carrier would raise huge red flags.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.beatriceco.com/bti/porticus/bell/bell_system_property.html

 

Here's a walk down memory lane, when the old Bell monopoly owned most of the phones connected to the system. In fact, there was a long time it was against their rules to connect a phone to the system without Bell Approval.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DoJ would not allow Apple to buy a wireless carrier. The vertical integration of device, content, and carrier would raise huge red flags.

 

AJ

 

I hate to disagree, but they will have absolutely no objection. Just as long as everybody else also could sell their handsets on the network. There will be 3 other networks as well. Plenty of choices.

They can be also be an MVNO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While i agree with both Fray and AJ, lets throw our views out the window and make believe that it would be okay for the DOJ to sign off on such a mega deal.

 

I still say it won't be Sprint/Clear/Softbank. Wouldn't it make more sense for Apple to go after a carrier like metroPCS/T-Mobile that offers both domestically and international?

 

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to disagree, but they will have absolutely no objection. Just as long as everybody else also could sell their handsets on the network.

 

Right, the DoJ would put many conditions on such vertical integration, would not allow Apple to buy a wireless carrier and turn it into iOS Mobile. And that should nip Apple in the bud because that is what Apple does. Apple operates its own closed ecosystem; outsiders need not apply.

 

So, unless Apple wants to use its disgustingly excessive cash reserves to buy a wireless carrier simply as an investment -- and I do not know why Apple would invest in an also ran like Sprint or T-Mobile -- Apple buying a wireless carrier is not going to happen.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...