Jump to content

Sprint and the iPhone


Feech

Recommended Posts

Although I am new around here I do see that folks like to play the hindsight is 20/20 game. Since I am slammed at work and looking for anything other than work to do I have a new one.

 

Does anyone think that Sprint would have been better off passing on the iPhone for another year or two and possibly positioning themselves for a better deal with Apple? Maybe going all in with Android handsets. Sprint started selling the iPhone in late 2011 and Google released Android 4.0 in that same time frame I believe.

 

My thinking is they should of held out possibly because Android 4.0 was that much of a leap from previous versions that it could compete directly with the iPhone..The report is that Sprint paid tons of money for the rights to sell it, but if you look at Verizons financials they actualy sold more Droids than iPhones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so. Carrying the iPhone helped increase upgrades which helped lower churn and also bring in more customers and raise arpu. It is a significant investment but a necessary one.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint had to get it. Especially, once Verizon got it. I think they saw a huge exodus of customers all leaving because they didn't have it. Sprint couldn't afford to lose those customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I am new around here I do see that folks like to play the hindsight is 20/20 game. Since I am slammed at work and looking for anything other than work to do I have a new one.

 

Does anyone think that Sprint would have been better off passing on the iPhone for another year or two and possibly positioning themselves for a better deal with Apple? Maybe going all in with Android handsets. Sprint started selling the iPhone in late 2011 and Google released Android 4.0 in that same time frame I believe.

 

My thinking is they should of held out possibly because Android 4.0 was that much of a leap from previous versions that it could compete directly with the iPhone..The report is that Sprint paid tons of money for the rights to sell it, but if you look at Verizons financials they actualy sold more Droids than iPhones

 

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/external/allthingsd/SIG=12h5ub20t/*http://allthingsd.com/20120726/sprint-ceo-on-iphone-we-made-the-right-decision/?reflink=ATD_yahoo_ticker

 

I think that Sprint made the right decision by carrying the iPhone now.

 

Btw, is anyone keeping a running tally on how many iPhones Sprint has sold so far? It'd be nice to see where they stack up against in terms of the contract obligation they made to Apple.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://us.rd.yahoo.c...TD_yahoo_ticker

 

I think that Sprint made the right decision by carrying the iPhone now.

 

Btw, is anyone keeping a running tally on how many iPhones Sprint has sold so far? It'd be nice to see where they stack up against in terms of the contract obligation they made to Apple.

 

Ask and ye shall receive. Thankfully, someone at seekingalpha did the legwork. Here's the writeup. Overall the piece has a wait and see take to Sprint, but it gives us the data you're looking for.

 

http://seekingalpha....te?source=yahoo

 

Here's the data:

 

Q4 '11 1.8 million

q1 '12 <1.5 million

q2 '12 >1.5 million

 

Total ~ 4.8 million.

 

Also, from the earnings call Hesse said they are ahead of their sales obligations under the apple contract. However, not further details were given.

 

Dan Hesse:

To date, although still young in its product life cycle, we are observing materially lower early like churn rates for iPhone customers compared to other smartphone customers. The operational performance so far continues to support our decision to carry the iPhone. Considering postpaid devices only, we are ahead of the pace required to meet our contracted commitments to Apple.

 

Transcript http://seekingalpha....ipt?part=single

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of those numbers how many are new customers though? Keep your customers is fantastic but are you enticing the competition with your offerings

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of those numbers how many are new customers though? Keep your customers is fantastic but are you enticing the competition with your offerings

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

You can read through the transcript and find a reference to this. For the 2nd qtr it was 40%. That is 40% of iphone sales were to new Sprint customers. I believe that is about in line with the previous quarters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So maybe about 200,000 customers net new maybe? I still wonder bottom line if it will be worth it long term. I'm not sure if I buy that existing Sprint customers were going to walk out if Sprint didn't have the iPhone though. There is a lot of reasons to stay with Sprint. Price and unlimited data being 2 of the most important. Customers could have bolted from Sprint long ago for AT&T if the iPhone was what they wanted. I know some did based on the numbers AT&T put up, but if they didn't have the iPhone then the assumption would be that they would have added just 200,000 plus customers in the quarter or could I assume customers were coming to Sprint anyway and the iPhone was available so they chose that because it was there.

 

I over think things a bit and without hard numbers we would never know but it's interesting to me anyway.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The iPhone was a big thing for sprint to add/keep customers. Look at t mobile. They are bleeding customers like crazy. Not just because they don't have the iphone, but it is partially responsible. As a major carrier, to not carry the largest selling model of phone is not good for business. The subsidy difference is blown way out of proportion. Its like $50 over 20 months...

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So maybe about 200,000 customers net new maybe? I still wonder bottom line if it will be worth it long term. I'm not sure if I buy that existing Sprint customers were going to walk out if Sprint didn't have the iPhone though. There is a lot of reasons to stay with Sprint. Price and unlimited data being 2 of the most important. Customers could have bolted from Sprint long ago for AT&T if the iPhone was what they wanted. I know some did based on the numbers AT&T put up, but if they didn't have the iPhone then the assumption would be that they would have added just 200,000 plus customers in the quarter or could I assume customers were coming to Sprint anyway and the iPhone was available so they chose that because it was there.

 

I over think things a bit and without hard numbers we would never know but it's interesting to me anyway.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

There are more things to consider than just price or unlimited data, if there wasn't then sprint would be number one but they aren't. A lot of people didn't jump ship because their hatred for at&t was more than their love for the iphone but once verizon got it then it was a different story. Also, what was sprints saving grace a few years ago was the release of the og evo. The iphone is a must for sprint to stay competitive. Love it or hate it, its a must have. Sprint would rather be in a position of increasing subscribers and losing money than to be losing subscribers and losing money.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The iPhone was a big thing for sprint to add/keep customers. Look at t mobile. They are bleeding customers like crazy. Not just because they don't have the iphone, but it is partially responsible. As a major carrier, to not carry the largest selling model of phone is not good for business. The subsidy difference is blown way out of proportion. Its like $50 over 20 months...

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

 

T-Mobile and us cellular doesn't have the fruit phone

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile and us cellular doesn't have the fruit phone

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

And nobody considers those carriers to be in the top tier of wireless carriers. US Cellular is regional, and T-Mobile has always been a laughingstock. Not to mention T-Mobile is bleeding customers like crazy. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/iphone_less_mobile_losing_flood_JbCg9zJQACpSHoN277PkXO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my own personal case I was waiting for Sprint to get the iPhone so I could get in on their unlimited data. I would not have settled for an Android device. Sprint getting the iPhone is a big reason why I am currently a subscriber to their service.

 

This is very true. I have two friends on the original iPhone plan on ATT. They both have an iPhone 4 now and that is a nice position to be in. One of these friends regularly uses over 8GB a month and would be in a bad position with a tiered plan. The other, while he rarely uses more than 2GB a month, says that he would hate having to worry about how much data he is using. Worrying about data kills the simplicity vibe of something like an iPhone and I think that is where Sprint is successful. Not much in the way of surprise charges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my own personal case I was waiting for Sprint to get the iPhone so I could get in on their unlimited data. I would not have settled for an Android device. Sprint getting the iPhone is a big reason why I am currently a subscriber to their service.

 

Well I most definitely wasn't settling for an iPhone :) but welcome to sprint none the less

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • As far as I know it's ubiquitous. Ultimately the network decides if you should use VoNR vs VoLTE but pretty much anytime my phone is in standalone mode and I place a call, it goes over NR.   Yup, it was terrible. After a while, I just connected to the WiFi, and that worked fine at about 90Mbps. I get the feeling that rather than doing a "real" upgrade where they install new antennas, upgrade backhaul, etc., T-Mobile instead installed new radios onto the existing and already overloaded DAS and called it a day, which isn't enough. Compared to Yankee Stadium, where they actually went and deployed new antennas/radios for their n41 upgrade, and you're able to get upwards of 200Mbps at sold-out games, Arthur Ashe really is a joke. What's worse is that the folks in their NOC likely know this already, but no effort is being made to change that. I'm not asking for T-Mobile to deploy mmWave everywhere like Verizon but there is a real use case for it at stadiums.
    • Does anyone know how well implemented is VoNR in the 5 boroughs. Does anyone use it? I have an iPhone 15 Pro. Does anyone know if T-Mobile is still working on upgrading their network? It seems like the service has gone down. My phone struggles in parts of the Belt Pkwy, and data is slow. 
    • I come to the US Open men’s semifinals and finals every year, and I’ve never been able to use my T-Mobile phone successfully. Usually AT&T is the top performer—good to hear Verizon has upped their game. 
    • One sector down, two more to go — — — — —  I was at Arthur Ashe Stadium for the U.S. Open today and the good news is that there is an n25/41 DAS setup throughout USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center. From the "boardwalk" to the outdoor concession area, to inside the stadium; you connect to standalone n41 and n25 everywhere via oDAS and iDAS. The bad news is that in the actual stadium it's beyond useless. While I saw strong coverage as indicated by signal bars and I was able to make calls and send texts, there was no data throughput at all. Running a speed test failed 9 out of 10 times. The only time I got a speed test to work was by switching to LTE funnily enough or by using NSA 5G where the test would initiate via LTE and then n41 would kick in giving me ~20Mbps. T-Mobile has so much traffic on their 5G network that now n41 gets bogged down before LTE. That was a first for me! In the stadium in the same area Verizon got 1.2Gbps on mmWave and LTE kept timing out when trying to test it. My Boost line on AT&T got upwards of 150Mbps on C-band and I know they have mmWave deployed as I saw their Nokia mmWave antennas deployed but I was unable to test it. In the outdoor concession area T-Mobile performed well getting over 150Mbps on n41. AT&T in these areas saw over 250Mbps on C-band and I didn't get the opportunity to test Verizon there. It just seems like 140MHz n41 is not enough capacity for the amount of people inside the stadium. Hopefully T-Mobile is considering deploying n258 to all of these stadiums since they now own that mmWave nationwide. It'd make a world of difference in terms of capacity at these venues. Bonus Pics: Verizon and AT&T mmWave Hidden carrier neutral DAS: 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...