Jump to content

Confused on LTE upload speed


Recommended Posts

I see a lot of the time references saying sprint's 5X5 LTE has a theoretical 37mbps down and 10+(?) up. And also Sprint promises 6-8mbps down/2-3mbps up. Why is the upload always less than the download? The few days I've had LTE here in the Olathe, KS area the upload is almost always just as high if not higher than the download. Typically 7mbps down/up to 12mbps down/up and more recently 7mbps down and 9mbps up. Why is it like this? Is Sprint going to limit upload speeds in the future or something?

Edited by yuhfhrh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upload is typically slower in wireless systems due to the fact your phone has a weaker transmitter than the tower.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, there are 2 receive antennas and only 1 transmit. You can have MIMO on your downlink but not on your uplink.

 

Well, technically, the uplink, too, can use MIMO. WiMAX can utilize uplink MIMO. But, as I mentioned the other day, it was just too soon, the technology too immature. However, uplink MIMO will return with LTE Advanced.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a related note, I have observed several times what appears to be uplink transfer rate shaping. Note the early burst, then significant drop in the uplink transfer rate vs time graphs.

 

w1p3sm.png

 

257epf7.png

 

Honestly, if true, uplink rate shaping would make sense. Most uploads are relatively small -- no more than 1-2 MB. So, provide high uplink throughput for the first 1-2 seconds. That will complete most uploads, give the appearance of faster speeds, and get the uploader off the network more quickly.

 

Any other observations of this phenomenon?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a related note' date=' I have observed several times what appears to be uplink transfer rate shaping. Note the early burst, then significant drop in the uplink transfer rate vs time graphs.

 

Honestly, if true, uplink rate shaping would make sense. Most uploads are relatively small -- no more than 1-2 MB. So, provide high uplink throughput for the first 1-2 seconds. That will complete most uploads, give the appearance of faster speeds, and get the uploader off the network more quickly.

 

Any other observations of this phenomenon?

 

AJ[/quote']

 

I have noticed this in several posts from other members where you can see the whole upload test trail. Interesting.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a related note, I have observed several times what appears to be uplink transfer rate shaping. Note the early burst, then

Honestly, if true, uplink rate shaping would make sense. Most uploads are relatively small -- no more than 1-2 MB. So, provide high uplink throughput for the first 1-2 seconds. That will complete most uploads, give the appearance of faster speeds, and get the uploader off the network more quickly.

 

Any other observations of this phenomenon?

 

AJ

 

I've noticed something similar even on my legacy 3G connection at home using Sprint's speed test app and the speedtest.net app. The speed will spike at the very beginning, usually to something like 256kb/s, then sit there for a few seconds until it starts a more realistic rate of traffic (usually < 100kb/s for me).

 

It doesn't sound like traffic shaping on the network side to me, but more like the IP stack trying to figure out the optimal flow on the network. I've seen similar situations with ftp traffic in the past when we were debugging some network issues at work, but the slowdown was caused by packet loss by some faulty intrusion prevention devices. So when the network layer realized things weren't as fast as it should have been, it slowed down the send rate.

 

Just a guess, but that's what I've been seeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Interesting, T-Mobile is demolishing a Sprint B25-only site that even Sprint wasn't using anymore. Sprint moved from that pole to a former Clearwire site on a nearby much taller mast but never demolished this original site. Up through 2021, there was still power to this site. Some time during COVID, the lights on the RRUs were no longer lit.  https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/ENR24-01067/Kirkland Streetview 
    • I noticed that on my Boost line. I ended up mapping some 2G on Cellmapper because of that lol. Looked like it would connect to T-Mobile 2G for a bit and then disconnect and show no signal. Thankfully it's back up and running.
    • Outside expert explanations of AT&T outage: https://www.lightreading.com/mobile-core/at-t-s-outage-twists-up-its-mwc-story
    • Service just restored in Columbus Ohio on AT&T network.  They seemed to do it in the following order: business (done early) then 5g hours later then ADSL and 4g about 4 hours after business. Then texting and wifi calling that was not setup before. At one point they were trying to route calls on T-Mobile 2g, but that failed.
    • Nationwide AT&T outage occurring right now affecting all of their brands, MVNOs, and even FirstNet. Although this kind of outage is rare, I bet Verizon and T-Mobile are both gonna try to use this to pull First Responders to their network or at least consider them for backup services. https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/22/24079910/att-network-outage-sos-mode
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...