Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - DFW Market (Dallas/Ft. Worth/Wichita Falls)


purpleunicorn

Recommended Posts

The most recent map of completed NV towers lacks coverage shows no entries for northern suburbs such as Plano, Frisco, The Colony, Carrollton, and Lewisville. Two towers in Richardson show up, and about an hour ago I established a 4G LTE connection to the one just north of UTD. Then there's one isolated completed tower just South of 380 on Preston Road.

 

The Ft. Worth area shows a lot more completed towers than the Dallas area.

 

Bob

Actualyyyyyyy I'm happy to say I finally have lte in Frisco

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actualyyyyyyy I'm happy to say I finally have lte in Frisco

 

I see a tower scheduled for August about a mile from my office in Hall Office Park. The tower is at 3966 Parkwood Blvd, a bit Northeast of Parkwood & Gaylord.

 

A tower in Plano a mile or so from my house is also scheduled for August.

 

Soon!!!

 

I flew into and out of San Antonio over the weekend. Several times I briefly saw an LTE connection while inside the airport, but the EVO LTE wouldn't hold onto it. Driving 410 between the airport and US 90, then West on 90 I noted what appeared to be LTE connections to more than one tower. Unfortunately I couldn't stop to investigate. While having a piece of pie at Marie Callendar's I unfortunately remained stuck with a 3G connection. But the pie was good! :)

 

Bob

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I see a tower scheduled for August about a mile from my office in Hall Office Park. The tower is at 3966 Parkwood Blvd, a bit Northeast of Parkwood & Gaylord.

 

A tower in Plano a mile or so from my house is also scheduled for August.

 

Soon!!!

 

I flew into and out of San Antonio over the weekend. Several times I briefly saw an LTE connection while inside the airport, but the EVO LTE wouldn't hold onto it. Driving 410 between the airport and US 90, then West on 90 I noted what appeared to be LTE connections to more than one tower. Unfortunately I couldn't stop to investigate. While having a piece of pie at Marie Callendar's I unfortunately remained stuck with a 3G connection. But the pie was good!

 

Bob

I bet it was! :rolleyes: Plano isn't Too far from McKinney

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what is going on in DFW. For last two weeks I've been getting 4G signals in more and more places, faster speed tests... Then this week they have completely regressed. I'm not getting signals in places I once was, and in places where I was getting download speeds of 20-30 Mbps I'm now getting <1.0, even though I'm showing a full strength 4G signal. WTH?!?!?

 

The first set was run near 377 and 820.

 

The second set was run near glade and 26.

 

speedtest2.jpg

 

speedtest.jpg

Edited by brizzyintx
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are discussing the same issue in the Houston thread. I think its all the MW sites are having some issues. Its probably reverting to T1 backhaul while they are working through the problem. It probably won't be like this for long. Keep us posted as to what you see. Thanks.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LIve in Plano ... work in Dallas at North Tollway and 635. No 4G LTE in Plano. At work, I get a very weak 4G signal -- bounces back and forth between 4G, 3G and roaming. When I do have 4G, it's very slow. Almost always less than 1Mbps. Hope this improves in coming weeks. My Evo 4G saw better speeds on WiMax than I'm seeing on my SGIII.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at dinner tonight in Fort Worth when I picked up a weak 4g signal. It was switching back and forth between 4g and 3g. I managed to run a speed test but didn't look up the RSSI (or whatever that is for 4g).

post-2939-13444782415264_thumb.jpg

It's not a stellar speed, but considering that the signal wasn't consistent...it was usable.

Sent from my GS3 on Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Really? I work near the airport and and have only picked up a weak LTE signal a couple times.

I was at Love Field so maybe that's it? And then I had a layover in san antonio where I had 4 bars consistently and NOW I'm in my house in Atlanta and I have 3 bars

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at Love Field so maybe that's it? And then I had a layover in san antonio where I had 4 bars consistently and NOW I'm in my house in Atlanta and I have 3 bars

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

That is good news. But remember that the "bars" display on the GS3 with an LTE data connection is not based on the LTE signal, but on the 1x signal. I hope you were also getting good LTE data speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That is good news. But remember that the "bars" display on the GS3 with an LTE data connection is not based on the LTE signal, but on the 1x signal. I hope you were also getting good LTE data speeds.

I was! I would post them but it says upload too big

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having just left DFW airport, I can tell you that I did not even get a taste of LTE from there to Mansfield. We shall see when Sprint starts to pay attention to the area near Joe Pool Lake. I have decided not to hold my breath, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having just left DFW airport, I can tell you that I did not even get a taste of LTE from there to Mansfield. We shall see when Sprint starts to pay attention to the area near Joe Pool Lake. I have decided not to hold my breath, though.

I was at love field....a good 30 minutes from DFW

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at Love Field so maybe that's it? And then I had a layover in san antonio where I had 4 bars consistently and NOW I'm in my house in Atlanta and I have 3 bars

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Ah. That explains it. I work near DFW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I have gotten 4G near the downtown Dallas area. Just nothing near DFW. I guess Sprint has their reasons!

 

That kind of surprises me. All of the travelers through DFW, all of the hotels around the airport, and all of the industry surrounding it.. I guess they're more concerned about private residences. Which is good, it just doesn't help me out here at work. LOL

 

BTW, got a great signal sitting at the bar on Friday. 35W in between Basswood and Western Center. 12-13 Mbps indoors.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That kind of surprises me. All of the travelers through DFW, all of the hotels around the airport, and all of the industry surrounding it.. I guess they're more concerned about private residences. Which is good, it just doesn't help me out here at work. LOL

 

BTW, got a great signal sitting at the bar on Friday. 35W in between Basswood and Western Center. 12-13 Mbps indoors.

 

 

Nothing near DFW. Colliville has a tower with it. It's all mostly Ft Worth or Dallas. AFW has a tower, but it's heavily pointed toward the Speedway.

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has a DAS system at DFW. These are more complex to convert than a normal site. Love Field is just served from two adjacent sites and doesn't have DAS.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having just left DFW airport, I can tell you that I did not even get a taste of LTE from there to Mansfield. We shall see when Sprint starts to pay attention to the area near Joe Pool Lake. I have decided not to hold my breath, though.

 

I get LTE on the south side of DFW Airport (360 & Trinity), then again at 360 & 303. Been getting it for a couple of weeks now. I work right next to the Grand Prairie Airport and get LTE also.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...