Jump to content

4G Cores (Switch centers)


Recommended Posts

It's been mentioned many times in various forums that the 4G cores (switching centers) need to be online before 4G goes live in a market (obviously). Has anyone seen information about where all the cores are and any schedule information for them?

 

Is it typically one core per market, one core supporting mutliple markets or multiple cores per market? Probably a mixed bag, as with everything else, depending on the size of the market, etc. :)

 

Just curious since I haven't seen as much detail or info floating around about the cores as the sites themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sponsor maps shows what switch each site is connected to. I have not seen any location information on these switches but they are likely in a hardened facility/Central Ofice just like normal phone switches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, I think I'm going to finish the AlcaLu videos. Maybe they mentioned something about the cores in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, I think I'm going to finish the AlcaLu videos. Maybe they mentioned something about the cores in there.

 

They did. I think it was video 2. They only mention the cores in AlcaLu's service area though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep only watched video 1 so far. Time to bake a pizza and pop some popcorn!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly, that story that technobuffalo ran about "4g active in certain cities" was actually just the 4g cores being finished.

 

Sent from my Jelly Bean Toro using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 4G Cores (DDC's) are scattered all around the country. 30 to serve 97 markets. Each site will have a preferred core, but the system is designed for redundancy and each site will be capable of running through backhaul to other cores, depending on dynamic loads of the network. The only exceptions being Puerto Rico and the Hawaiian Islands. They would only go to a stateside core if their local cores were to be down.

Sprint 4G Core Locations:

Alcatel/Lucent:

  • Phoenix, Arizona
  • Pearl City, Hawaii
  • Burbank, California
  • Anaheim, California
  • Rialto, California
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Elkridge, Maryland (2)
  • New York, New York
  • Harrison, New Jersey
  • Springfield, Massachusetts
  • Fairfax, South Carolina

Ericsson:

  • Miami, Florida
  • Atlanta, Georgia
  • Ft. Worth, Texas
  • Nashville, Tennessee
  • Kansas City, Kansas
  • Houston, Texas
  • Orlando, Florida

Samsung:

  • Chicago, Illinois
  • Buffalo, New York
  • Akron, Ohio
  • Bayamon, Puerto Rico
  • Cheyenne, Wyoming
  • Omaha, Nebraska
  • Stockton, California
  • St. Paul, Minnesota
  • Tacoma, Washington
  • Seattle, Washington
  • Englewood, Colorado
  • San Jose, California
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert have you heard anything on the 4g core for Boston market.

 

Not beyond there was a date it was supposed to be live in May. I'm guessing it is live now that LTE sites are coming online in the market.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Cheyenne' date=' Wyoming has a 4G Core...

 

Makes you wonder why. FIT in Montana, 4G Core in Wyoming... seems odd.[/quote']

 

It is odd. Especially since there are locations in the Denver area and Omaha area. But, like mentioned above, the LTE network and cores are designed for redundancy. Even though each site has a primary core, traffic (all or a portion) can be directed to many different cores. This will provide a more consistent experience and also probably help prevent the problems of the core crashes that Verizon has had.

 

With dynamic core loading, Sprint can start to shuttle off part of a cores traffic to other cores, seamlessly on the fly. And if they have a catastrophic failure that shuts down a core, they can change all that traffic somewhere else. Almost instantly. And they can spread that traffic across several cores, not just one.

 

It's pretty awesome. They wish they had that kind of flexibility with their 1x and EVDO network at MSC Switch facilities.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert the site completion map had a live LTE site in springfield mass i went to it (the ghetto) and had really bad 3g like 2g speeds i went to settings- about phone - network and it said 1xrtt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert the site completion map had a live LTE site in springfield mass i went to it (the ghetto) and had really bad 3g like 2g speeds i went to settings- about phone - network and it said 1xrtt

 

Did you confirm you were actually connected to that site? If you weren't even getting EVDO, it makes me wonder if the site was down. Were there any trucks?

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's pretty awesome. They wish they had that kind of flexibility with their 1x and EVDO network at MSC Switch facilities.

 

 

So, in the market maps, if I see this on a site for the RF switch "

RAL-MORRISVILLE-MSC_1"

that doesn't tell me which 4G core, just the legacy switch. It's not saying there is a 4g core switching center in Morrisville. Right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, in the market maps, if I see this on a site for the RF switch "

RAL-MORRISVILLE-MSC_1"

that doesn't tell me which 4G core, just the legacy switch. It's not saying there is a 4g core switching center in Morrisville. Right?

 

That's correct. That's the MSC, which handles voice and 1x/EVDO data. Because of dynamic loading, there is really no specific 4G core for a site, only a preferred list. There is, of course, a Number 1 on the list. I guess you could refer to that one being the primary 4G core for the site. But I do not have info on the cores that specific sites would connect to. Theoretically, it could be any 4G core.

 

What I don't know is if they can cross OEM lines. Can an Ericsson site get routed through a Samsung 4G core? I don't know the answer to that question.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That clears things up better now. Thanks Robert.

 

Do we know if the cores are on schedule or not? The 14 or so listed in the technobuffalo article should be online by now if everything is going as planned. I was just wondering if there were any issues or delays getting this new infrastructure in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That clears things up better now. Thanks Robert.

 

Do we know if the cores are on schedule or not? The 14 or so listed in the technobuffalo article should be online by now if everything is going as planned. I was just wondering if there were any issues or delays getting this new infrastructure in place.

 

I have only seen one update on the docs that were shown in the TechnoBuffalo article. It looks like there was some slippage in the last update. But that update was in Mid May.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you confirm you were actually connected to that site? If you weren't even getting EVDO, it makes me wonder if the site was down. Were there any trucks?

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

i had full signal didn't see any trucks only stayed there about a minute didn't want to get shot or robbed lol.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One note on Cheyenne: Sprint's backbone has a PoP there. So it's pretty easy for them to put a 4g core there with plenty of Internet bandwidth. I wouldn't expect any more Sprint service to come to WY, but the core is.nicely redundant, since it's only a few milliseconds away from Denver.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One note on Cheyenne: Sprint's backbone has a PoP there. So it's pretty easy for them to put a 4g core there with plenty of Internet bandwidth. I wouldn't expect any more Sprint service to come to WY, but the core is.nicely redundant, since it's only a few milliseconds away from Denver.

 

That explains why some of the cores have PoP written next to them. :)

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long time lover of their looking glass service.

 

I love their looking glass.

 

It's really amazing to think what a huge part of the internet Sprint used to be. Sort of sad that's changed so much over the past five years.

 

I love the annual Baker's Dozen

 

http://www.renesys.com/blog/2012/02/a-bakers-dozen-2011-edition.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...