Jump to content

4G Cores (Switch centers)

4ginnc
 Share

Recommended Posts

4ginnc Member Level: eHRPD

4ginnc

Posted
Posted

It's been mentioned many times in various forums that the 4G cores (switching centers) need to be online before 4G goes live in a market (obviously). Has anyone seen information about where all the cores are and any schedule information for them?

 

Is it typically one core per market, one core supporting mutliple markets or multiple cores per market? Probably a mixed bag, as with everything else, depending on the size of the market, etc. :)

 

Just curious since I haven't seen as much detail or info floating around about the cores as the sites themselves.

pii100 Member Level: 3G EVDO

pii100

Posted
Posted

The sponsor maps shows what switch each site is connected to. I have not seen any location information on these switches but they are likely in a hardened facility/Central Ofice just like normal phone switches.

pii100 Member Level: 3G EVDO

pii100

Posted
Posted

You know, I think I'm going to finish the AlcaLu videos. Maybe they mentioned something about the cores in there.

iansltx Member Level: 4G WiMax

iansltx

Posted
Posted

You know, I think I'm going to finish the AlcaLu videos. Maybe they mentioned something about the cores in there.

 

They did. I think it was video 2. They only mention the cores in AlcaLu's service area though.

pii100 Member Level: 3G EVDO

pii100

Posted
Posted

Yep only watched video 1 so far. Time to bake a pizza and pop some popcorn!

pyroscott Member Level: LTE Advanced

pyroscott

Posted
Posted

If I remember correctly, that story that technobuffalo ran about "4g active in certain cities" was actually just the 4g cores being finished.

 

Sent from my Jelly Bean Toro using Forum Runner

S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

The 4G Cores (DDC's) are scattered all around the country. 30 to serve 97 markets. Each site will have a preferred core, but the system is designed for redundancy and each site will be capable of running through backhaul to other cores, depending on dynamic loads of the network. The only exceptions being Puerto Rico and the Hawaiian Islands. They would only go to a stateside core if their local cores were to be down.

Sprint 4G Core Locations:

Alcatel/Lucent:

  • Phoenix, Arizona
  • Pearl City, Hawaii
  • Burbank, California
  • Anaheim, California
  • Rialto, California
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Elkridge, Maryland (2)
  • New York, New York
  • Harrison, New Jersey
  • Springfield, Massachusetts
  • Fairfax, South Carolina

Ericsson:

  • Miami, Florida
  • Atlanta, Georgia
  • Ft. Worth, Texas
  • Nashville, Tennessee
  • Kansas City, Kansas
  • Houston, Texas
  • Orlando, Florida

Samsung:

  • Chicago, Illinois
  • Buffalo, New York
  • Akron, Ohio
  • Bayamon, Puerto Rico
  • Cheyenne, Wyoming
  • Omaha, Nebraska
  • Stockton, California
  • St. Paul, Minnesota
  • Tacoma, Washington
  • Seattle, Washington
  • Englewood, Colorado
  • San Jose, California
  • Like 7
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted
Robert have you heard anything on the 4g core for Boston market.

 

Not beyond there was a date it was supposed to be live in May. I'm guessing it is live now that LTE sites are coming online in the market.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

irev210 Member Level: 4G WiMax

irev210

Posted
Posted

I love how Cheyenne, Wyoming has a 4G Core...

 

Makes you wonder why. FIT in Montana, 4G Core in Wyoming... seems odd.

S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted
I love how Cheyenne' date=' Wyoming has a 4G Core...

 

Makes you wonder why. FIT in Montana, 4G Core in Wyoming... seems odd.[/quote']

 

It is odd. Especially since there are locations in the Denver area and Omaha area. But, like mentioned above, the LTE network and cores are designed for redundancy. Even though each site has a primary core, traffic (all or a portion) can be directed to many different cores. This will provide a more consistent experience and also probably help prevent the problems of the core crashes that Verizon has had.

 

With dynamic core loading, Sprint can start to shuttle off part of a cores traffic to other cores, seamlessly on the fly. And if they have a catastrophic failure that shuts down a core, they can change all that traffic somewhere else. Almost instantly. And they can spread that traffic across several cores, not just one.

 

It's pretty awesome. They wish they had that kind of flexibility with their 1x and EVDO network at MSC Switch facilities.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Kevster1321 Member Level: 3G EVDO

Kevster1321

Posted
Posted

Robert the site completion map had a live LTE site in springfield mass i went to it (the ghetto) and had really bad 3g like 2g speeds i went to settings- about phone - network and it said 1xrtt

S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted
Robert the site completion map had a live LTE site in springfield mass i went to it (the ghetto) and had really bad 3g like 2g speeds i went to settings- about phone - network and it said 1xrtt

 

Did you confirm you were actually connected to that site? If you weren't even getting EVDO, it makes me wonder if the site was down. Were there any trucks?

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

4ginnc Member Level: eHRPD

4ginnc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

It's pretty awesome. They wish they had that kind of flexibility with their 1x and EVDO network at MSC Switch facilities.

 

 

So, in the market maps, if I see this on a site for the RF switch "

RAL-MORRISVILLE-MSC_1"

that doesn't tell me which 4G core, just the legacy switch. It's not saying there is a 4g core switching center in Morrisville. Right?

  • Like 1
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

So, in the market maps, if I see this on a site for the RF switch "

RAL-MORRISVILLE-MSC_1"

that doesn't tell me which 4G core, just the legacy switch. It's not saying there is a 4g core switching center in Morrisville. Right?

 

That's correct. That's the MSC, which handles voice and 1x/EVDO data. Because of dynamic loading, there is really no specific 4G core for a site, only a preferred list. There is, of course, a Number 1 on the list. I guess you could refer to that one being the primary 4G core for the site. But I do not have info on the cores that specific sites would connect to. Theoretically, it could be any 4G core.

 

What I don't know is if they can cross OEM lines. Can an Ericsson site get routed through a Samsung 4G core? I don't know the answer to that question.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
4ginnc Member Level: eHRPD

4ginnc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That clears things up better now. Thanks Robert.

 

Do we know if the cores are on schedule or not? The 14 or so listed in the technobuffalo article should be online by now if everything is going as planned. I was just wondering if there were any issues or delays getting this new infrastructure in place.

S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

That clears things up better now. Thanks Robert.

 

Do we know if the cores are on schedule or not? The 14 or so listed in the technobuffalo article should be online by now if everything is going as planned. I was just wondering if there were any issues or delays getting this new infrastructure in place.

 

I have only seen one update on the docs that were shown in the TechnoBuffalo article. It looks like there was some slippage in the last update. But that update was in Mid May.

 

Robert

Kevster1321 Member Level: 3G EVDO

Kevster1321

Posted
Posted

Did you confirm you were actually connected to that site? If you weren't even getting EVDO, it makes me wonder if the site was down. Were there any trucks?

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

i had full signal didn't see any trucks only stayed there about a minute didn't want to get shot or robbed lol.
  • Like 3
iansltx Member Level: 4G WiMax

iansltx

Posted
Posted

One note on Cheyenne: Sprint's backbone has a PoP there. So it's pretty easy for them to put a 4g core there with plenty of Internet bandwidth. I wouldn't expect any more Sprint service to come to WY, but the core is.nicely redundant, since it's only a few milliseconds away from Denver.

  • Like 3
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

One note on Cheyenne: Sprint's backbone has a PoP there. So it's pretty easy for them to put a 4g core there with plenty of Internet bandwidth. I wouldn't expect any more Sprint service to come to WY, but the core is.nicely redundant, since it's only a few milliseconds away from Denver.

 

That explains why some of the cores have PoP written next to them. :)

 

Robert

  • Like 1
pii100 Member Level: 3G EVDO

pii100

Posted
Posted

one more for the road

 

NorthAmerica-PIP.png

  • Like 3
pii100 Member Level: 3G EVDO

pii100

Posted
Posted

Long time lover of their looking glass service.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      It took a couple of months but this site is finally back online.  I was certain that a decommission permit would come through one day since it was offline for over 3 months but I passed by it today and it was working again. — — — — — This site is also finally live. This was probably the longest I had ever seen a site take to go live once all hardware was installed, about 3 months. Hopefully the site in Long Island City doesn't take as long.
    • Trip
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By Trip · Posted

      So while we wait for @RAvirani to fix the website, I was able to connect one of my phones to Verizon n77 on a site with an NCI that appears to be adjacent to an NCI that was already in my database. Specifically, the site I call Taylor Run has been observed with these NCIs on n77: 44EEE469A 44EEE46AA 44EEE46AB 44EEE46BA 44EEE46BB I separately connected to the site I call Fairlington on its beta sector on n77: 44EEE46DA 44EEE46DB I'm assuming alpha sector is 44EE46CA/B.  With this data, I learned two things: 1) They're clearly not tracking the LTE GCIs with the NR NCIs.  Taylor Run is 1B61Fxx, while Fairlington is 1B680xx, not sequential. 2) It's clear that they're not using three byte sectors.  They're not even using two byte sectors like LTE does.  It looks to be done in an oddball fashion like how Dish is doing things.  Best I can come up with is a site ID that's something like: (NCI-0x20)/(0x30) It's possible it's actually (NCI+0x10)/(0x30) but I'm not really sure.  I also haven't connected to anything outside my immediate area here to know if this is consistent with other regions.  Not entirely sure how to persuade a device to do so, my Dish phone just connects to n77 at random in lieu of going to no signal.  (No data passes.) My take is to "break" the site notes for Verizon NR the way it was done with Dish NR, so at least the notes don't get copied to inconsistent sites, as has happened when I connected to Fairlington (came up as "Taylor Run").  It seems that Verizon, AT&T, and Dish all need work on the NR side to make sure site notes work properly.  Frustrating that they didn't standardize that for NR the way they did for LTE.  T-Mobile and US Cellular (while it lasts) seem to have done it the way I would have done it.  The others, not so much. - Trip
    • CrackedLCD
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By CrackedLCD · Posted

      I tried to access that forum but it says I need a password. Is it limit to certain contributors?    I was going to report that the website is broken. For days it's been saying unable to retrieve signal data then going to a 404 error.
    • Trip
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By Trip · Posted

      Sorry, I forgot about it when I posted previously.  And then I was talking to chamb by e-mail and away from my computer and suggested posting here.  Moved the posts to the proper spot. - Trip
    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mikejeep · Posted

      It is probably better to post topics related to the map in the dedicated thread to help keep things organized and secure. This thread is big enough as it is, just want to try help keep things on track!

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...