Jump to content

Lad Vegas 3g speeds?


PhxkinMassacre

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I'm going to Vegas with some friends for a week or two and am wondering how the 3g is out there. I have an evo lte and since lte isn't there yet I can't decide if I'm going to stick with this or re activate my original evo for a while since Vegas seems to be blanketed in Wimax according to sprints map. So if anyone had an idea as to what the 3g speeds are like out there (especially near the strip) it would help a lot :D

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, I'm going to Vegas with some friends for a week or two and am wondering how the 3g is out there. I have an evo lte and since lte isn't there yet I can't decide if I'm going to stick with this or re activate my original evo for a while since Vegas seems to be blanketed in Wimax according to sprints map. So if anyone had an idea as to what the 3g speeds are like out there (especially near the strip) it would help a lot :D

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

LAS VEGAS - 3340 Palmdesert Way - May 7th 2012.

las20vegas20-20334020palmdesert20way-11355922.png

 

There have been tons of upgrades in the area.

https://network.sprint.com/search/3340%20Palmdesert%20Way,%20Las%20Vegas,%20NV/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From my experience last week its terrible on the strip(too crowded, ATT suffers also) but decent once you get away a small distance. I was able to get over 2Mb down behind the Venetian.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All carriers are bad on the Strip unless you are indoors on DAS. I have used ATT, VZW and Sprint on the Strip. :td:

 

I've never tried Tmo, but I'd expect the same. It can be really bad up high in a casino tower. Too much noise for your device.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that the Venetian is using DAS in the mall/canal area as I had excellent signal and tolerable speeds 200-300Kb. DAS and Pico-cells are the only viable solution in such densely populated areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As those have said before, off the strip isn't bad. That being said, your milage will vary 3G wise around the rest of the valley. I'm currently running a Galaxy Nexus and my 3G varies from Ok to useless depending on where I am. Areas inside the 215 beltway that circles Las Vegas are covered best, especially if you want to rock your OG EVO and WiMAX. I found being on the strip, using WiMAX really helped with data connectivity as it's not oversaturated with users like the 3G airwaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the same concern. I have a weekend trip planned pretty soon to Vegas. It seems like everyone here is recommending to switch to a WiMax phone. I currently have an iPhone but just recently purchased a Samsung Nexus S 4G through eBay. anyone have an idea how well the battery performs while using WiMax? I know the battery would die fast on my old EVO 4G. then again any EVDO phone will die quickly in poor data speed areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently down at the Riviera (towards north Strip) and got this on 3G:

 

209189906.png

 

and this on WiMAX:

 

209189335.png

 

Can't say if that's typical though as I don't spend very much time on the Strip.

 

Sent from my PG41200 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It’s a neat and seemingly valid / effective strategy that, at least from my understanding, is only really used by VZW
    • Those are usually left over from the initial AWS deployment, so all run B13/B66 with support for BC0/BC1 (although that’s been shut off on most sites). No NR. Sites with the later Ericsson radios got an OTA update and broadcast B2. On those sites, a B5 OTA update was also available (and tested), but ultimately rolled back. Putting up all that power/spectrum severely degraded the B13 output.  The site atop Crystal Mountain is another story and uses the same setup as the site on the ridge near Neilton. These antennas were selected for their vertical beamwidth. Most modern directional antennas have small vertical beamwidths and would require extreme downtilt to cover the road next to a steep ridge. Thus, they would have a severely limited coverage footprint beyond the road. Omnis can be a better choice in these instances, especially when there’s LoS to the coverage objective (since they’ll generally have lower gain figures). Omnis also don’t run in to the horizontal sector edge problem, which can be difficult to optimize for with directional antennas that have complex or irregular 3D gain profiles. That’s why on a lot of sites on mountains, you’ll see wider antennas used. For example, the Verizon site on Joyce Ridge has three sectors with 80-degree HBW antennas. 
    • Do you know what RAN is behind those Omni's? LTE (bands?) are they pushing any NR through them? Very curious   edit: I guess I could check cellmapper etc but you might know more nuance!
    • N41 here has been expanded from 140Mhz to 180Mhz.  Speeds seem the same so they just need to work on backhaul
    • I noticed today that T-mobile has shut of B41 LTE in the Louisville area and widened the 2nd n41 carrier to 80MHz. That just leaves them with 5x5 B12, 10x10 B2, and two 10x10 B66 carriers on LTE, everything else is in NR (besides their 2G network). They have 20x20 n71, 20x20 n25, 5x5 n25, and 180MHz n41. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...