Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Lower Central Valley Market (Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia)


aelenes

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

So I heard some news from sprint that 10 towers in the fresno area are scheduled for network vision and they should be up and running in about 90 days .. The one tower I heard the rep say was on Dakota and peach but couldn't understand what other towers she said .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I heard some news from sprint that 10 towers in the fresno area are scheduled for network vision and they should be up and running in about 90 days .. The one tower I heard the rep say was on Dakota and peach but couldn't understand what other towers she said .

 

Was this in a store you heard this from, because from all information we have here on S4GRU pinpoints the start of the Lower Central Valley Market at a summer start, but if they want to start work sooner, we will definitely be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Samsung source told me a few weeks ago that they are trying to get all their markets started before summer. They really want to be the first OEM done. They want to use Sprint NV to be a spring board for more work in the U.S. Network Vision was the first large scale Samsung Network contract in America. Samsung wants to become a dominant player.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Samsung source told me a few weeks ago that they are trying to get all their markets started before summer. They really want to be the first OEM done. They want to use Sprint NV to be a spring board for more work in the U.S. Network Vision was the first large scale Samsung Network contract in America. Samsung wants to become a dominant player.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Hence the reason they jumped into the WiMax/TD-LTE RRU's. They very well could be the major provider for TD-LTE in Network Vision 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome I live near that

 

So I heard some news from sprint that 10 towers in the fresno area are scheduled for network vision and they should be up and running in about 90 days .. The one tower I heard the rep say was on Dakota and peach but couldn't understand what other towers she said .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have some bad news I called the city permits for fresno and she said that she talked to sprint January and they did not want to follow the city regulations to cover up the towers if they upgraded them and after she informed sprint about the regulations they said they were not looking to cover them up and since then they have not submitted any thing yet . But I did call fresno county building permits and the gentleman informed me sprint was doing a system upgrade in shaver lake ca they were replacing cabinets adding antennas hopefully that's lte ...

Edited by matthew23319
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have some bad news I called the city permits for fresno and she said that she talked to sprint January and they did not want to follow the city regulations to cover up the towers if they upgraded them and after she informed sprint about the regulations they said they were not looking to cover them up and since then they have not submitted any thing yet . But I did call fresno county building permits and the gentleman informed me sprint was doing a system upgrade in shaver lake ca they were replacing cabinets adding antennas hopefully that's lte ...

 

If Sprint bypasses Fresno, the outcries from "madder than hell" customers will get them in trouble with the FCC the BBB, and other agencies in charge of their business industry. They have had no problems complying with stealth requirements in other cities across the country. Give them time, they will have to redesign the plans for Fresno. No biggie, just time consuming.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And one more thing, in Vegas, all site plans have been submitted by engineering companies. They could have been the ones giving Fresno problems. Did you get any info from Clovis?

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I been trying to contact clovis and they have not returned my call . The lady from sprint permit said they are having a meeting with all carriers in a couple days but it is closed doors she mentioned that someone from sprint should be attending and if she hears anything she will email but she believes they should began submitting permits soon

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If Sprint bypasses Fresno, the outcries from "madder than hell" customers will get them in trouble with the FCC the BBB, and other agencies in charge of their business industry. They have had no problems complying with stealth requirements in other cities across the country. Give them time, they will have to redesign the plans for Fresno. No biggie, just time consuming.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

If a city has unrealistic expectations, they will just make them last. Also, Sprint is in compliance with the FCC. They don't have to add LTE or do NV upgrades if they don't want to. I don't know what you're talking about them getting into trouble.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If a city has unrealistic expectations, they will just make them last. Also, Sprint is in compliance with the FCC. They don't have to add LTE or do NV upgrades if they don't want to. I don't know what you're talking about them getting into trouble.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

I don't know. I think I was in a hurry typing that out the other day at work. I forgot that Sprint doesn't have build out requirements on G block like other carriers have on 700MHz.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the Visalia City building inspectors office today. I'm going to try to get to the building permits office before I go out of town on vacation.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tower sprint has submitted a permit is on Howard Street near river park and freeway 41

I believe work is not gonna start for quite some time

 

Anywhere between now and 6 months it will be worked on, done, and hopefully inspected.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...