Jump to content

Ever wonder what's inside one of those big cellular "panel" antennas?


jeremyandrew

Recommended Posts

Lots of little antennas :cool:

 

IMG_2352.JPG

 

IMG_2353.JPG

 

This single-pole/single-band antenna is nowhere near the beasts being used for NV, but the concept remains mostly the same. In the multi-pole/multi-band antennas, the elements are at 90-degree angles to each other, which allows for port-to-port isolation, there are some larger elements for 800 MHz and there is an internal remote tilt mechanism.

 

This poor fella was being 'flown' to the top of the tower on a particularly blustry winter afternoon many years ago and smacked the tower leg on the way up. The radome was instantly destroyed but we had a spare on-hand, so it was taken back to the office and given an autopsy. I found a special place for it in the dumpster yesterday, but though I should take a few pictures.

  • Like 28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of little antennas :cool:

 

This single-pole/single-band antenna is nowhere near the beasts being used for NV, but the concept remains mostly the same. In the multi-pole/multi-band antennas, the elements are at 90-degree angles to each other, which allows for port-to-port isolation, there are some larger elements for 800 MHz and there is an internal remote tilt mechanism.

 

This poor fella was being 'flown' to the top of the tower on a particularly blustry winter afternoon many years ago and smacked the tower leg on the way up. The radome was instantly destroyed but we had a spare on-hand, so it was taken back to the office and given an autopsy. I found a special place for it in the dumpster yesterday, but though I should take a few pictures.

 

I know this may be hard to believe for some, but I had never seen inside a panel that close up before. Thanks for sharing!

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, in addition to directionality, multiple antennas are key to dBi gain.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like AJ taught us to call them sites instead of towers I find myself calling these the proper name of antennas and not panels.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

Yeah, I suppose technically the panel is just the housing. And the housing provides no functionality except to protect the internal antennas from the elements. So the panel ain't nothing but a thang, all things considered.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of little antennas :cool:

BULK OF ORIGINAL POST REMOVED -----

multi-pole/multi-band antennas, the elements are at 90-degree angles to each other, which allows for port-to-port isolation, there are some larger elements for 800 MHz and there is an internal remote tilt mechanism.

 

Can somebody clarify this a little. In Multi-band antennas, if the elements are at 90 degree angles to each other, does this mean that the 1900 signal and the 800 signal will be sent in entirely different directions?? If your home is in the "Poor Spot" for a 1900 signal because of the 1900 signal not being aimed at your location, is it possible that the 800 signal might just be leaving the cell site in a different direction and be aimed at your location even by default? Would the 800 signal leave the cell site at a 90 degree angle to the 1900 signal.

 

I know that they can have the capability to move the aiming left or right or up and down slightly, but is the starting point off by 90 degrees as the default??? Good technical question maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that they can have the capability to move the aiming left or right or up and down slightly, but is the starting point off by 90 degrees as the default??? Good technical question maybe.

 

I am not certain of this, but some of the antenna elements may be horizontally polarized, others vertically polarized.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not certain of this, but some of the antenna elements may be horizontally polarized, others vertically polarized.

 

AJ

 

I always thought that Cell/PCS signals were always vertical polarization probably because of the old pull-out antennas on the older cell phones. Horizontal polarization is not normally a good thing for portable devices. At least that is what I was taught many years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bands will have roughly the same azimuth. The elements have a polarization offset from each other for diversity reasons not to be confused with the azimuth or downtilt.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought that Cell/PCS signals were always vertical polarization probably because of the old pull-out antennas on the older cell phones. Horizontal polarization is not normally a good thing for portable devices. At least that is what I was taught many years ago.

 

If memory serves me correctly, the FCC required AMPS signals to be cross polarized on the uplink and downlink. And as I sort through FCC OET filings for my device authorization articles, the uplink ERP/EIRP figures that I see are almost always greater with horizontal polarization than with vertical polarization -- though, I do spot an occasional anomaly, in which the vertical polarization for a particular band/band class is greater.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I always thought that Cell/PCS signals were always vertical polarization probably because of the old pull-out antennas on the older cell phones. Horizontal polarization is not normally a good thing for portable devices. At least that is what I was taught many years ago.

 

The elements are +45 and -45 degrees so technically not completely vertically or horizontally polarized.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The elements are +45 and -45 degrees so technically not completely vertically or horizontally polarized.

 

Sent from my little Note2

Designing antennas for Cell/PCS phones has to be a very tough job. The phone can be in any position at any time. When held up to the ear, it rarely is totally vertical and can be almost horizontal. The phone can be laying on its back on a desk. Or in a holster on a guys belt or upside down in a ladies pocketbook. It has to be able to pick up a signal of almost any polarization.

 

Did we determine that the multi-band antennas used at a NV site would normally transmit a 1900 and a 800 signal in the same direction with Sprint having the ability to possibly shift one of the two signals slightly if desired? This is what I originally believed to be true, but the earlier statement about a 90 degree difference in the elements really can be interpreted in several ways.

I am thinking it may be that the 800 signal might need to be shifted in direction slightly at some sites to keep the more powerful 800 signal from being aimed at another nearby site. You would not really want two adjacent sites blasting out a 800 signal directly at each other. This might cause issues where it did not with 1900 signals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The three sections for the six antennas have independent remote downtilt adjustments. I haven't seen anything for remote azimuth though.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

I haven't seen them installed at any of the NV sites, but antennas with remote steering(azimuth) are available. Take a look at this KMW catalog. http://www.kmw.co.kr/popup/KMW_Antenna_Cata_Rev1.0.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen them installed at any of the NV sites, but antennas with remote steering(azimuth) are available. Take a look at this KMW catalog. http://www.kmw.co.kr...Cata_Rev1.0.pdf

 

Figured someone had them as it would be relatively simple. Now if only Sprint would install them so they could easily fix the cheeseball mistakes the RF interns made in several areas with the NV rollout ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have assumed that the mechanical steering is only for gross adjustments and the majority of the steering is in the DSP processing. Maybe it isn't that advanced yet but you can use the interference from multiple antennas and a lot of horsepower to steer the signal or even pick out multiple transmitters on the same frequency at the same time by discriminating in the spatial dimension. Anyone stuck in the old world of basic antenna design and mechanical tilt adjustments is far behind the times ;)

 

 

Anyone with deeper knowledge of LTE and how the new NV equipment works have more info? Are they at this level yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Haven't posted in a while, but I happened across one of the antennas being used in the NV deployment that is defective and was replaced. I couldn't help but see what makes it tick and thought I would share. This is a 6-pole, dual band(800/1900) antenna from Andrew with Remote Electrical Tilt.

 

The antenna is about 6 feet tall
IMG_4118.JPG

 

The RF and RET connections

IMG_4119.JPG

 

Under the radome. The 800 arrays are in the top-most and bottom-most positions

IMG_4121.JPG

 

 

The 800 array

IMG_4123.JPG

 

 

The backside. You can see the RET motors, all of the tiny hardline and the Electrical Tilt arrays

IMG_4124.JPG

 

 

The 1900 tilt array

IMG_4125.JPG

 

 

Enjoy.

 

http://imgur.com/Jw5yMTd,v8BqWTg,eDfn2ni,CS6NFRb,gPhTV6O,5tGPZsk,AZ327Sw,SMaNEKe

  • Like 30
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wireless nerd porn! Thx!!

No, that does not do it justice. This is practically gynecological wireless nerd porn.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'd be awesome to take a look inside an RRU as well. I used to take our VCRs, the TV and my Atari and Nintendo apart when I was growing up. My parents nearly had a heart attack since back then, our Zenith VCR was nearly $700. Fortunately, I was good at putting things back together, too. It's amazing how many screws and wires you really don't need inside most things...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No specific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...