Jump to content

iPhone 6 omnibus thread


sbolen

Recommended Posts

iphone-6-all-2.jpg

Above: a mockup of an iPhone 5S, iPhone 6 (4.7"), iPhone 6 (5.5"), and Current iPad Mini

 

All aboard the leaked parts rumor train! Here's a thread to post what you find/what's leaked, etc. As more details come forward closer to launch, I'll edit/update this post with the relevant information and link it to replies to this topic.

 

I think it would be a lot easier to contain everything relating to the new iPhone 6 ("iPhone Air"?) in one central location. B)

 

iPhone 6 Omnibus Thread Topics

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were early rumors of only the larger 5.5" iPhone 6 model getting a sapphire crystal display... but a wild video appears:

 

If the 4.7" iPhone 6 has a Sapphire display, I'm selling my iPhone 5S outright to get one shortly after launch. I love the sapphire crystal domes on my nicer watches, so I'm really pumped to see what it looks like on top of a retina display.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never having to worry about a cracked screen.... That would be amazing. I would consider selling my 5s and getting the 6 if it does have a sapphire crystal screen. And if I can't afford it, I'll just be very upset each day I can't afford it until February lol.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never having to worry about a cracked screen.... That would be amazing. I would consider selling my 5s and getting the 6 if it does have a sapphire crystal screen. And if I can't afford it, I'll just be very upset each day I can't afford it until February lol.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's the scratches that are killing me. I have one from a rivet on my jeans in the top third of the display that drives me slowly insane. I have AppleCare+ on the phone, so I may swallow the $50 closer to the launch of the new phones to boost my trade in/resale value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

February :(. I might do easy pay for this phone if it proves worth it. I don't want too. But I also can't buy a phone full retail right now. AGH

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

February :(. I might do easy pay for this phone if it proves worth it. I don't want too. But I also can't buy a phone full retail right now. AGH

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's why I always have two newer phones. To use one while I'm selling the other to pay for the next device. :)
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I always have two newer phones. To use one while I'm selling the other to pay for the next device. :)

 

The Robert M. Herron Museum of Modern Cellphones cannot comprehend phone sales.  You are giving up technological works of art.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I always have two newer phones. To use one while I'm selling the other to pay for the next device. :)

I usually finance the full retail price every other year on a Barclaycard Apple 0% financing option - last year I sold my iPhone 4S outright and paid the difference on the carrier subsidy price (to net the 64GB size).

 

This year, it's full retail (financed), and a lump payment to Barclaycard once I sell the 5S. Split over 12 months with that actual trade-in/Craigslist/eBay cash, it's still not that bad.

 

My wife hates it. Lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But what about the band support?

 

*Sits back, watches flame war erupt*

I could probably guarantee Band 41 support, but probably not carrier aggregation. We'll leave that to the Android devices so that I'm envious of them for yet another year...  <_<

 

-Anthony

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could probably guarantee Band 41 support, but probably not carrier aggregation. We'll leave that to the Android devices so that I'm envious of them for yet another year... <_<

 

-Anthony

I'm betting on both. One thing Apple excels at is LTE band support, and I can definitely see them implementing CA. The technology is available.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MDM 9x35 chipset it is a Category 6 part capable of 300 Mbps on the downlink and 50 Mbps on uplink. Getting to 300 Mbps of downstream throughput requires aggregation of two 20 MHz wide LTE carriers. If Apple uses this part and it is widely available, then it  will be capable of CA. If not, then not, I guess not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm betting on both. One thing Apple excels at is LTE band support, and I can definitely see them implementing CA. The technology is available.

 

I'll take that bet on CA. Band 41 was available when the iPhone 5s was released and well.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

http://tktechnewsblog.wordpress.com/2014/07/08/exclusive-first-images-of-iwatch-prototype-designer-emerge-with-display-on/

 

Someone is trying to make a name for himself this year.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Dead link. And what was that picture taken with? A potato?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dead link. And what was that picture taken with? A potato?

He took it down between the time I posted it and now. I knew he was going overboard.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He took it down between the time I posted it and now. I knew he was going overboard.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

I take anything he says with a semi truckload full of salt. He hates sprint. I once commented on his video about the 5% throttling and he argued with me and told me it was all customers that would be throttled whenever sprint wants too because sprint's network sucks. If he is trying to make something of himself, he's doing a really bad job at it. Providing unconvincing false information. Uh what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are so many rumors out there, it is hard to know what is truth and what is not.  A couple of thoughts:

 

All three bands being supported, I would have to say yes.  Apple would shoot themselves in the foot if the iPhone 6 did not support all three.  There are so many people awaiting the release. Samsung's sales are poor right now for the S5 due to people waiting for the release of the next iPhone.  If the i6 is a home run, Samsung will lose a fair amount of market share.

 

I will say that I am going to purchase the 5.5" 6 due to the amount of documents I have to read through for work.  I also hope that if the rumor of the larger i6 having128GB of memory is true also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone is trying to make a name for himself this year.

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

He also posted this gem: http://tktechnewsblog.wordpress.com/2014/07/08/sprint-bends-customers-over-again-welcome-to-tiered-data-plans/

 

Speculate much? Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm betting on both. One thing Apple excels at is LTE band support, and I can definitely see them implementing CA. The technology is available.

MDM 9x35 chipset it is a Category 6 part capable of 300 Mbps on the downlink and 50 Mbps on uplink. Getting to 300 Mbps of downstream throughput requires aggregation of two 20 MHz wide LTE carriers. If Apple uses this part and it is widely available, then it  will be capable of CA. If not, then not, I guess not...

I'll take that bet on CA. Band 41 was available when the iPhone 5s was released and well.....

 

I will take that bet.  iPhone 6 will support carrier aggregation -- for AT&T, not for Sprint.

 

iPhone 6 was certainly in development, maybe even in production, before the category 6 MDM9635 became widely available.  So, like last year when Apple used the category 3 MDM9615 for the second year in a row, it will be about a year behind the curve on the latest baseband, going with the category 4 MDM9625 this year.  That will limit LTE bandwidth to a maximum of 20 MHz FDD/TDD.  Carrier aggregation will be possible only in combinations that sum to 20 MHz FDD/TDD or less -- such as the band 17 + band 4 configuration that AT&T is using in Chicago, etc.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will take that bet.  iPhone 6 will support carrier aggregation -- for AT&T, not for Sprint.

 

iPhone 6 was certainly in development, maybe even in production, before the category 6 MDM9635 became widely available.  So, like last year when Apple used the category 3 MDM9615 for the second year in a row, it will be about a year behind the curve on the latest baseband, going with the category 4 MDM9625 this year.  That will limit LTE bandwidth to a maximum of 20 MHz FDD/TDD.  Carrier aggregation will be possible only in combinations that sum to 20 MHz FDD/TDD or less -- such as the band 17 + band 4 configuration that AT&T is using in Chicago, etc.

 

AJ

 

You might be right, AJ. We will see. But 9635 samples have been floating around since last year. Now, can they produce enough for Apple's needs? Who are the target carriers? Does China Mobile, Softbank and Sprint add up to enough iPhones for Apple to place a large enough order for 9635s? Or does everybody get 9625s? None of the other US carriers need a 20+20 CA except Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see Apple segregating the two versions with the 4.7" getting the 9625 and the 5.5" getting the 9635. Same segmentation strategy as the S5 Prime and the One M8 Prime. Here is a discussion of the S5 Prime:

 

http://www.zdnet.com/samsung-galaxy-s5-prime-to-support-225-mbps-download-7000029652/

 

BTW, the 9635 was released last November. The iPhones usually go into production couple of months before introduction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Video is not playing anymore. Maybe apple had it removed because it's a legit leak.

I wouldn't hold it past Apple.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...