Jump to content

Sprint LTE (and Verizon LTE, and T-Mobile HSPA+) in central Fort Worth

Recommended Posts

Right now I'm tethered (via the official Sprint Mobile Hotspot app; I bought the 2GB data pack last week) to Sprint LTE via my GSIII in central Fort Worth, specifically 1709 E Hattie St (yes, bad part of town...it's a mission trip).


I also have LTE on my iPad on Verizon, plus HSPA+ (not sure if it's dual-carrier) on my T-Mobile ZTE Rocket 3.0.


Over the next few days, when I find the time, I'll be pounding all three carriers' networks with speed tests, traceroutes, etc. and will post with the results that I find.


Results have been encouraging so far...I've been able to hit 27 Mbps down, 10 Mbps up (see this speedtest result for example: http://www.speedtest...d/214310452.png) on the network while inside one of the buildings here, though I just hit 17 Mbps down, 7 Mbps up on SoftLayer's speedtest while WiFi tethered.


Latency-wise, I've hit sub-40ms to SoftLayer in Dallas, which is a good measure of network-specific latency since SoftLayer is extremely well-connected and is pretty much right next door. I'll post a traceroute sometime tomorrow. I just did a quick ping to (Level3 anycasted DNS, with one cluster in Dallas) and hit 25ms at one point. Crazy stuff, for a cellular network.


I'm being served (according to NetMonitor) by the tower at 140 Beach St., 2.07 miles away according to Google Maps. The signal from where I'm at right now (on the second floor, inside) is in the high -80s to low -90s according to my system status in Android settings (RSRP I assume?). Side note: it appears as though NetMonitor kicks the hotspot functionality offline :/.


One side note: I didn't hit LTE on my trip from DFW to here until maybe ten minutes away. I had eHRPD from the moment I turned my phone on near the E concourse, and speeds were decent (1+ Mbps). But the way we drove I didn't hit 4G until a couple dozen cell sites, and a dozen miles, later (I have my NetMonitor logs turned on). So yeah...I can see why people are kvetching about LTE coverage being nowhere near complete in the DFW market :)


EDIT 1: For some odd reason tethering seems to sporadically drop its connectivity (solution: restart tethering, reconnect my computer). Other than that, the web browsing experience is like I'm sitting on my home connection. Which is saying a lot...I have a $115/mo cable connection hooked to a $130 (today's dollars) 802.11n high power router :)

Edited by iansltx
  • Like 6

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its crazy to consider a sub 40ms ping through a wireless connection. Where we have come from with technology? Thank you for your observations.


Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

You at Beautiful Feet? Definitely watch yourself around there (18 years PD all in and around that area). Thanks for posting that info too! It's nice to know LTE is up when I get back from vacation next week.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you compare those results against a 3G connection in the same location? I know people are geeked about LTE but I'm more into the comparisons between the two.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Treadhead Affirmative, and I will.


@Feech I will. Need to turn off LTE to do it but I will compare. Will update momentarily.


EDIT: 3G speeds are still slowisb here. Actually, the word is probably "unreliable". I can hit a megabit down and 600k up with around 100ms latency to Dallas sites, but my guess is that there aren't enough EvDO carriers to keep up with the load. Voice works perfectly though.


EDIT 2: Interesting fact: none of my LTE usage has shown up on My Sprint/Self Service yet. Not on 4G data, not on Mobile Hotspot.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

LTE speeds this evening are phenomenal. Better tham VZW (at least on downloads) and T-Mobile.


I'll add comparisons and traceroutes shortly.


Sent from my Galaxy SIII-32GB using Forum Runner



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I finally got around to sitting down and conducting a round of tests, between my Sprint SIII, my VZW iPad and my T-Mobile Rocket 3.0). These devices are all pretty much the cream of the crop for their respective networks; the Rocket is a DC-HSPA+ modem, while the other two devices have LTE.


All devices/services were tested via my early 2009 MacBook, running Mac OS X 10.7 with the latest dev build of Chrome and the latest patches etc. The computer got upgraded to 8GB of RAM as of a couple months ago, so the machine performance isn't a bottleneck on any of these tests :)


The SIII was connected to my computer via Mobile Hotspot (WiFi…which is fine because I can hit 60 Mbps in both directions over WiFi with this computer). The iPad will be connected via wired tethering. The ZTE Rocket…well, it's a USB modem :)


There are two types of tests that I performed on the services: traceroutes and speed tests. Speedtests were performed via speedtest.net, on all six (or seven in the case of T-Mobile) locations in the DFW metro area. Traceroutes…well, I'll tell ya about trace routes…


Traceroutes are a good way of seeing how a cell network makes it to the Internet, revealing weird routing issues and average latency in one fell swoop. I used the "traceroute -aw1" command/switches for all traceroutes.


For each test, I traced to multiple destinations in the DFW area:


1. Level3's anycasted DNS server cluster

2. Google

3. HawkHost (they have their main web server in one of SoftLayer's Dallas data centers)


These routes won't go outside the DFW metro, since there's an internet exchange point nearby and all of the above are well-connected. So the air interface and 4G core performance determines latency.


I also traced to a Los Angeles game server (one owned by Riot Games, which makes the League of Legends MMORTS). There are more variables in that route, but the game server is supposed to be on a connection optimized for low latency. I threw it in to see how attempting to gem over 4G would fare (I've actually played loL on both VZW and T-Mobile 4G, with decent results). The final hops prior to reaching the server don't respond, but the trace route is still an interesting metric.


Anyway, to the results.




I mentioned my signals (high -80s, low -90s) on Sprint last night. They've been holding solid, though it appears as though I'm now bouncing between two cell sites, one at 140 S Beach St and the other at 825 Elmwood Ave. The former site is about 2.07 miles to the east, while the latter is 1.25 miles to the southwest. The phone seems to prefer the Beach St site, at least for now, though I wasn't looking at NetMonitor while doing these tests (doing so appears to break the connection). Signals are comparable between the two sites, despite the distance difference.


Anyway, trace routes:


traceroute to (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS8151] ( 2.402 ms 1.541 ms 2.111 ms

2 * * *

3 [AS65534] ( 46.841 ms 28.704 ms 29.675 ms

4 [AS65534] ( 27.744 ms 25.759 ms 31.000 ms

5 [AS65534] ( 31.986 ms 29.558 ms 33.932 ms

6 [AS0] ( 37.304 ms 28.054 ms 31.316 ms

7 [AS0] sl-crs3-fw-.sprintlink.net ( 41.015 ms 25.423 ms 37.316 ms

8 [AS0] ( 39.794 ms 30.025 ms 38.854 ms

9 [AS0] ( 69.245 ms 32.335 ms

[AS0] ( 40.343 ms

10 [AS3356] ae-42-90.car2.dallas1.level3.net ( 26.670 ms *

[AS3356] ae-22-70.car2.dallas1.level3.net ( 41.526 ms

11 [AS3356] d.resolvers.level3.net ( 23.501 ms 26.760 ms 33.687 ms


traceroute to google.com (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS8151] ( 3.854 ms 2.644 ms 2.270 ms

2 * * *

3 [AS65534] ( 48.743 ms 45.255 ms 38.453 ms

4 [AS65534] ( 47.706 ms 31.540 ms 32.022 ms

5 [AS65534] ( 31.919 ms 30.257 ms 39.014 ms

6 [AS0] ( 28.720 ms 31.719 ms 24.332 ms

7 [AS0] sl-crs3-fw-.sprintlink.net ( 26.680 ms 36.220 ms 30.845 ms

8 [AS0] ( 43.688 ms 32.624 ms 27.808 ms

9 [AS0] ( 41.304 ms 35.326 ms 37.922 ms

10 [AS15169] ( 39.091 ms 26.790 ms 39.628 ms

11 [AS15169] ( 40.034 ms 31.108 ms 41.041 ms

12 [AS15169] dfw06s17-in-f2.1e100.net ( 38.971 ms 25.529 ms 39.765 ms


traceroute to hawkhost.com (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS8151] ( 3.072 ms 1.519 ms 1.978 ms

2 * * *

3 [AS65534] ( 47.948 ms 34.675 ms 30.455 ms

4 [AS65534] ( 31.169 ms 32.130 ms 30.519 ms

5 [AS65534] ( 31.298 ms 36.638 ms 28.947 ms

6 [AS0] ( 39.199 ms 34.246 ms 31.075 ms

7 [AS0] sl-crs3-fw-.sprintlink.net ( 40.203 ms 58.584 ms 49.778 ms

8 [AS0] ( 29.413 ms 37.149 ms 30.622 ms

9 [AS0] ( 51.995 ms

[AS0] ( 37.028 ms

[AS0] ( 37.290 ms

10 [AS3356] softlayer-t.edge2.dallas3.level3.net ( 38.267 ms 31.048 ms 25.645 ms

11 [AS36351] ae1.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com ( 51.114 ms

[AS36351] ae1.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com ( 49.808 ms

[AS36351] ae1.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com ( 30.909 ms

12 [AS36351] po1.fcr04.sr05.dal01.networklayer.com ( 32.889 ms

[AS36351] po2.fcr04.sr05.dal01.networklayer.com ( 28.788 ms

[AS36351] po1.fcr04.sr05.dal01.networklayer.com ( 35.019 ms

13 [AS36351] hawkhost.com ( 32.614 ms 24.745 ms 40.126 ms


traceroute to (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS8151] ( 4.191 ms 1.549 ms 1.939 ms

2 * * *

3 [AS65534] ( 36.927 ms 28.519 ms 30.773 ms

4 [AS65534] ( 27.947 ms 22.358 ms 30.028 ms

5 [AS65534] ( 30.576 ms 24.353 ms 28.630 ms

6 [AS0] ( 30.310 ms 24.222 ms 29.605 ms

7 [AS0] sl-crs3-fw-.sprintlink.net ( 31.358 ms 23.301 ms 29.283 ms

8 [AS0] ( 31.055 ms 19.127 ms 30.489 ms

9 [AS0] ( 61.083 ms 58.585 ms 59.481 ms

10 [AS0] ( 57.682 ms 49.928 ms 96.599 ms

11 [AS0] sl-st21-la-0-0-0.sprintlink.net ( 53.728 ms 58.446 ms 58.866 ms

12 [AS0] sl-internap-96007-0.sprintlink.net ( 60.127 ms 56.133 ms 58.847 ms

13 [AS10912] border1.po1-20g-bbnet1.lax010.pnap.net ( 59.916 ms

[AS10912] border1.po2-20g-bbnet2.lax010.pnap.net ( 55.250 ms 59.200 ms

14 * * *

15 * * *


Speed Tests


All of the below speed tests were taken at the same location, one after the other. I'd say that I pummeled the network, but my guess is I'm the only person on the tower, or close to it!


Fort Worth - One Source: http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073517462.png

Fort Worth - Charter: http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073518596.png

Dallas - SoftLayer: http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073520136.png

Dallas - 10gb.ru: http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073521195.png

Dallas - Partnership Broadband: http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073522239.png

Dallas - FrostHost: http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073524238.png


So yeah, phenomenal speeds at this time of day. Latency and jitter are both very low, giving me an Internet experience that pretty much feels like I'm using the fiber connection that the Sprint cell site is connected to. It's wonderful, really…looking forward to having this all the time!

  • Like 7

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites



As a disclaimer, I don't know what tower I'm connecting to. All I know is that my connection manager shows "3G" and -89 dBm signal (40% according to the connection manager). In short, I've seen much, much better from my modem (20+ Mbps speeds down, ~3 Mbps up)…but I'm in DFW, not south Florida. But despite the 3G moniker, latency is decently low…though the modem seems to flip between a slow 3G tower (with high latency) and a snappy 4G (HSPA+/HSPA+ DC) one. As a result, these tests took a while to execute.


SIde note: pretty sure I'm running on single-carrier H+ in these tests. So it's a good comparison of performance between Sprint's 5x5 network and T-Mobile's.




traceroute to (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS65534] ( 89.611 ms 58.840 ms 60.001 ms

2 [AS65534] ( 69.955 ms 219.360 ms 29.770 ms

3 [AS65534] ( 29.850 ms 29.176 ms 29.885 ms

4 [AS65534] ( 29.850 ms 29.271 ms 49.449 ms

5 [AS65534] ( 69.517 ms 88.746 ms 79.843 ms

6 [AS65534] ( 99.960 ms 49.248 ms 89.971 ms

7 [AS65534] ( 80.082 ms 68.764 ms 49.601 ms

8 [AS65534] ( 49.605 ms 29.404 ms 29.726 ms

9 [AS65534] ( 40.006 ms 29.136 ms 29.939 ms

10 [AS65534] ( 30.066 ms 38.893 ms 39.990 ms

11 [AS3356] ge-8-13.car2.dallas1.level3.net ( 39.978 ms 29.234 ms 29.846 ms

12 [AS3356] d.resolvers.level3.net ( 30.025 ms 28.999 ms 29.856 ms


traceroute to google.com (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS65534] ( 49.871 ms 44.084 ms 39.684 ms

2 [AS65534] ( 50.229 ms 49.326 ms 40.076 ms

3 [AS65534] ( 39.752 ms 39.100 ms 39.998 ms

4 [AS65534] ( 40.110 ms 49.002 ms 39.553 ms

5 [AS65534] ( 39.529 ms 39.111 ms 49.494 ms

6 [AS65534] ( 99.863 ms 39.054 ms 39.979 ms

7 [AS65534] ( 49.966 ms 39.109 ms 39.881 ms

8 [AS65534] ( 50.114 ms 51.272 ms 37.974 ms

9 [AS65534] ( 49.907 ms 38.593 ms 49.974 ms

10 [AS7018] ( 50.035 ms 119.499 ms 29.014 ms

11 [AS7018] cr84.dlstx.ip.att.net ( 29.867 ms 29.340 ms

[AS7018] cr83.dlstx.ip.att.net ( 29.597 ms

12 [AS7018] cr1.dlstx.ip.att.net ( 29.581 ms

[AS7018] cr2.dlstx.ip.att.net ( 29.389 ms 39.175 ms

13 [AS7018] gar23.dlstx.ip.att.net ( 70.131 ms 38.864 ms

[AS7018] ggr1.dlstx.ip.att.net ( 29.668 ms

14 [AS7018] ( 88.291 ms 117.174 ms 79.855 ms

15 [AS15169] ( 30.018 ms 29.115 ms 39.512 ms

16 [AS15169] ( 30.066 ms 29.152 ms 29.833 ms

17 [AS15169] dfw06s17-in-f8.1e100.net ( 30.038 ms 29.030 ms 29.724 ms


traceroute to hawkhost.com (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS65534] ( 49.957 ms 49.489 ms 39.863 ms

2 [AS65534] ( 53.342 ms 70.607 ms 48.061 ms

3 [AS65534] ( 49.815 ms 49.050 ms 40.172 ms

4 [AS65534] ( 49.859 ms 50.105 ms 49.019 ms

5 [AS65534] ( 42.207 ms 49.358 ms 39.938 ms

6 [AS65534] ( 49.842 ms 49.515 ms 49.573 ms

7 [AS65534] ( 48.094 ms 49.411 ms 49.556 ms

8 [AS65534] ( 49.243 ms 48.768 ms 149.547 ms

9 [AS65534] ( 42.535 ms 29.018 ms 30.286 ms

10 [AS65534] ( 29.584 ms 59.291 ms 39.946 ms

11 [AS3356] ge-8-13.car2.dallas1.level3.net ( 52.089 ms 226.401 ms 242.064 ms

12 [AS3356] ae-3-80.edge2.dallas3.level3.net ( 27.938 ms 47.560 ms 39.257 ms

13 [AS3356] softlayer-t.edge2.dallas3.level3.net ( 52.095 ms 37.344 ms 61.150 ms

14 [AS36351] ae1.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com ( 27.833 ms 29.548 ms 49.694 ms

15 [AS36351] po1.fcr04.sr05.dal01.networklayer.com ( 39.963 ms 35.215 ms

[AS36351] po2.fcr04.sr05.dal01.networklayer.com ( 29.205 ms

16 [AS36351] hawkhost.com ( 36.746 ms 37.125 ms 39.608 ms


traceroute to (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS65534] ( 49.653 ms 48.712 ms 50.094 ms

2 [AS65534] ( 49.823 ms 49.044 ms 40.407 ms

3 [AS65534] ( 29.545 ms 29.534 ms 29.453 ms

4 [AS65534] ( 39.823 ms 29.296 ms 29.331 ms

5 [AS65534] ( 29.766 ms 28.998 ms 29.771 ms

6 [AS65534] ( 50.021 ms 38.684 ms 30.071 ms

7 [AS65534] ( 29.530 ms 29.363 ms 29.851 ms

8 [AS65534] ( 30.025 ms 29.014 ms 39.962 ms

9 [AS65534] ( 29.950 ms 29.026 ms 29.899 ms

10 [AS7018] ( 30.028 ms 48.976 ms 29.719 ms

11 [AS7018] cr84.dlstx.ip.att.net ( 69.434 ms 59.051 ms 70.009 ms

12 [AS7018] cr2.dlstx.ip.att.net ( 69.908 ms 59.494 ms 59.770 ms

13 [AS7018] cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net ( 69.939 ms 69.542 ms 70.063 ms

14 [AS7018] ( 59.840 ms 69.437 ms 59.813 ms

15 * * *

16 [AS10912] border1.po1-20g-bbnet1.lax010.pnap.net ( 67.100 ms 79.715 ms 69.842 ms

17 * * *

18 * * *


Speed Tests


Charter - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073587248.png

OneSource Communications - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073588662.png

Partnership Broadband - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073590006.png

T-Mobile - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073594592.png

10gb.ru - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073597154.png

SoftLayer - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073598048.png

FrostHost - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073600515.png


The latency here is great…when the service is on H+. However the network tends to swap between H+ and standard, high-latency HSPA (probably even HSDPA). And speeds are a fraction of what I got on Sprint. Don't get me wrong…T-Mobile has a pretty solid network, but Sprint LTE beats T-Mobile with the same amount of FDD spectrum usage.

  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before I post the third of the tests (I don't have access to an AT&T LTE device) I'll open the floor to anyone who wants me to do some other tests in the area, though I have a limited data allotment on all devices and won't be straying much from this location until Sunday…so don't ask me for coverage reports around the entire city, beyond the NetMonitor info I'll post later :)


One interesting occurrence that I noticed was that my IP geolocated to DFW only with T-Mobile during these tests, despite routing definitely being right through Dallas or Fort Worth. Sprint was somewhere in Indiana, while Verizon was in the Wichita, KS area…showing just how inaccurate GeoIP databases are.




Unfortunately, I couldn't figure out a way to get dBm signal readings on my iPad, since I don't want to jailbreak it (at this point anyway). So we'll just have to rely on the 4 bars I got on LTE during my tests.




traceroute to (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS0] ( 0.852 ms 0.524 ms 0.456 ms

2 [AS6167] 97.sub-66-174-45.myvzw.com ( 34.379 ms 43.545 ms 51.992 ms

3 [AS6167] 49.sub-69-83-101.myvzw.com ( 31.130 ms 38.971 ms 52.552 ms

4 [AS6167] 195.sub-69-83-101.myvzw.com ( 58.988 ms 32.592 ms 55.979 ms

5 * * *

6 [AS6167] 71.sub-69-83-96.myvzw.com ( 125.429 ms 30.755 ms 43.970 ms

7 [AS0] tengige0-0-2-0.gw15.dfw9.alter.net ( 45.977 ms 46.721 ms 40.969 ms

8 [AS0] 0.xe-0-0-1.xt4.dfw9.alter.net ( 46.775 ms 47.808 ms 38.950 ms

9 [AS0] 0.xe-6-0-3.xl4.dfw7.alter.net ( 52.921 ms 48.616 ms 52.047 ms

10 [AS0] 0.ae4.br1.dfw13.alter.net ( 64.197 ms 43.554 ms 51.132 ms

11 [AS3356] ae6.edge2.dallas3.level3.net ( 52.435 ms 50.786 ms

[AS3356] ae7.edge2.dallas3.level3.com ( 43.982 ms

12 [AS3356] ae-12-60.car2.dallas1.level3.net ( 77.908 ms 192.500 ms

[AS3356] ae-22-70.car2.dallas1.level3.net ( 244.998 ms

13 [AS3356] d.resolvers.level3.net ( 61.476 ms 35.614 ms 40.047 ms


traceroute to google.com (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS0] ( 1.164 ms 0.493 ms 0.480 ms

2 [AS6167] 97.sub-66-174-45.myvzw.com ( 32.741 ms 52.162 ms 25.999 ms

3 [AS6167] 49.sub-69-83-101.myvzw.com ( 46.977 ms 31.190 ms 41.801 ms

4 [AS6167] 195.sub-69-83-101.myvzw.com ( 39.404 ms 32.178 ms 40.077 ms

5 * * *

6 [AS6167] 71.sub-69-83-96.myvzw.com ( 112.034 ms 50.286 ms 56.950 ms

7 [AS0] tengige0-0-2-0.gw15.dfw9.alter.net ( 54.124 ms 58.368 ms 59.093 ms

8 [AS0] 0.xe-0-0-0.xt3.dfw9.alter.net ( 47.792 ms 85.608 ms 79.857 ms

9 [AS0] 0.xe-5-0-0.xl3.dfw7.alter.net ( 135.971 ms 58.661 ms 45.833 ms

10 [AS0] tengige0-6-4-0.gw4.dfw13.alter.net ( 51.054 ms 39.707 ms

[AS0] tengige0-6-1-0.gw4.dfw13.alter.net ( 53.135 ms

11 [AS0] google-gw.customer.alter.net ( 120.032 ms 120.552 ms 119.013 ms

12 [AS15169] ( 55.986 ms 78.567 ms

[AS15169] ( 49.979 ms

13 * * *

14 * * *

15 [AS15169] ( 123.307 ms 81.750 ms

[AS15169] ( 152.032 ms

16 * * *

17 [AS15169] yh-in-f139.1e100.net ( 135.474 ms 69.755 ms 78.881 ms


traceroute to hawkhost.com (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS0] ( 0.861 ms 0.505 ms 0.475 ms

2 [AS6167] 97.sub-66-174-45.myvzw.com ( 31.686 ms 35.415 ms 39.564 ms

3 [AS6167] 49.sub-69-83-101.myvzw.com ( 41.001 ms 42.333 ms 45.824 ms

4 [AS6167] 195.sub-69-83-101.myvzw.com ( 32.965 ms 53.344 ms 28.909 ms

5 * * *

6 [AS6167] 71.sub-69-83-96.myvzw.com ( 124.296 ms 48.215 ms 52.064 ms

7 [AS0] tengige0-0-2-0.gw15.dfw9.alter.net ( 58.053 ms 55.385 ms 53.956 ms

8 [AS0] 0.xe-5-0-2.xt4.dfw9.alter.net ( 60.961 ms 181.657 ms 73.956 ms

9 [AS0] 0.xe-3-1-2.xl4.dfw7.alter.net ( 57.024 ms 119.571 ms 45.701 ms

10 [AS0] tengige0-7-4-0.gw4.dfw13.alter.net ( 58.524 ms

[AS0] tengige0-7-1-0.gw4.dfw13.alter.net ( 58.822 ms

[AS0] tengige0-7-4-0.gw4.dfw13.alter.net ( 54.706 ms

11 [AS7381] teliasonera-gw.customer.alter.net ( 60.121 ms 46.713 ms 35.048 ms

12 [AS1299] te3-3.bbr02.eq01.dal01.networklayer.com ( 43.691 ms 65.465 ms 44.911 ms

13 [AS36351] ae0.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com ( 47.977 ms 42.683 ms 45.879 ms

14 [AS36351] po2.fcr04.sr05.dal01.networklayer.com ( 31.256 ms 60.503 ms 54.886 ms

15 [AS36351] hawkhost.com ( 34.164 ms 57.673 ms 71.080 ms


traceroute to (, 64 hops max, 52 byte packets

1 [AS0] ( 1.144 ms 0.606 ms 0.484 ms

2 [AS6167] 97.sub-66-174-45.myvzw.com ( 49.450 ms 42.326 ms 52.136 ms

3 [AS6167] 49.sub-69-83-101.myvzw.com ( 50.068 ms 43.425 ms 39.095 ms

4 [AS6167] 195.sub-69-83-101.myvzw.com ( 48.531 ms 72.233 ms 42.906 ms

5 * * *

6 [AS6167] 71.sub-69-83-96.myvzw.com ( 99.923 ms 57.336 ms 53.966 ms

7 [AS0] tengige0-0-2-0.gw15.dfw9.alter.net ( 38.902 ms 39.316 ms 42.900 ms

8 [AS0] 0.xe-0-0-1.xt4.dfw9.alter.net ( 35.016 ms 38.822 ms 69.913 ms

9 [AS0] 0.xe-6-1-3.xl4.lax15.alter.net ( 96.835 ms 69.829 ms 78.784 ms

10 [AS0] pos7-0-0.gw3.lax15.alter.net ( 94.910 ms 72.971 ms 77.961 ms

11 [AS0] internapgige-gw.customer.alter.net ( 85.957 ms 71.689 ms 78.768 ms

12 [AS10912] border1.po1-20g-bbnet1.lax010.pnap.net ( 91.025 ms 72.877 ms 70.893 ms

13 * * *

14 * * *


Speed Tests


Charter - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073664393.png

One Source - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073665293.png

SoftLayer - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073666142.png

Partnership Broadband - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073667304.png

10gb.ru - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073669435.png

ForstHost - http://www.speedtest.net/result/2073672055.png




Verizon and T-Mobile are a different animal than Sprint. Both have a large number of subscribers already on the network (T-Mobile more so than Verizon, since any 3G or better T-Mobile phone draws from the available HSPA+ bandwidth). Both carriers are hitting within their advertised speed bracket (T-Mobile says their network should run around 10 Mbps, while Verizon says theirs is 5-12 Mbps down)…at least for download speeds (VZW is still turning in some nice upload numbers).


This means that speed numbers are significantly less spectacular than with Sprint…but it also means that speeds are unlikely to slip from where they are right now. By contrast, print's speeds will definitely drop a bit from what I'm seeing as more folks get and use LTE phones and devices, though smaller cell sites compared with Verizon should help a lot with this.


T-Mobile was, out of the three, the most unreliable, due to switching between higher-latency, lower-speed HSPA (or maybe even HSDPA) and HSPA+. You could tell that you were on a cellular network, though the exerpeince was still decent. With Verizon and Sprint on the other hand, it felt like I was on a wired connection, and a good one at that (DOCSIS 3 cable or something). I'll give Sprint the edge from a subjective quality standpoint (page load times etc., though I didn't put a stopwatch to anything…but I trust my gamer instincts as to latency perception). Which is great because..well…I have unlimited on-phone data and a couple gigabytes of tethering to chew through on Sprint, assuming Sprint is even counting my LTE mobile hotspot usage at this point.


And, again, if Sprint's LTE network is going to end up like I'm seeing at this location, nationwide, I won't mind going from three diverse cellular connections to one.

  • Like 3

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The exciting thing is that this is just the beginning! Assuming that they keep scaling their backhaul upwards, I don't see why they can't maintain excellent speeds as they add LTD on 800 and 2500. The next couple of years in telecom are going to be exciting...for all of the major carriers.


Sent from my PG41200 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd run some side by side tests with AT&T LTE, Verizon LTE, and Sprint LTE via tether on 3 HTC Andrioid Phones (HTC VIVID, HTC Thunderbolt, and HTC EVO 4G LTE [all owned from day 1 on their respective launch days]); unfortunately, Sprint's flavor is not yet active in my part of the Metroplex (Lewsiville/Coppell near 121 and 35E). I have to go over to Far North Dallas later today and was going hop a few roads over to north Richardson where I know there is an active site and see what I get.


I had a TMo HSPA+ HTC phone until a few weeks ag; I traded it for a few $ to help pick up the EVO 4G LTE. I guess you could say I like to early adopt. (As does my best friend/roommate)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are AT&T LTE speeds looking at this point? That's the only service I'm unable to test, due to lack of equipment.


Sent from my Galaxy SIII-32GB using Forum Runner

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

@bluepoint951 It does not appear that Sprint has LTE in certain parts of Mansfield, either. The good news is that my 4G LTE experience has improved since Sunday. More sites have been coming online...or at least I have been able to connect to more sites..as the week progressed. A great launch for Sprint? Not by a long shot. However, Sprint is on the right track.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are AT&T LTE speeds looking at this point? That's the only service I'm unable to test, due to lack of equipment.


Sent from my Galaxy SIII-32GB using Forum Runner


AT first, it was just like Verizon, I'd get some crazy 35-45Mbps down and 15Mbps up with 40-60 pings; these days its still a high 10s sometimes the occasinal 20 and 5-10up. It also depends on weather you keep the LTE or get pushed back to HSPA+, for some reason the Vivid will prefer a strong HSPA+ siginal over a weak LTE signal unless you force LTE only.


My Thunderbolt with VZW still gets 12-15 Mbps down consistently and 3-7 up; though, I will say at the convention in Downtown Ft. Worth I was at, at the beginning of June (10k~ish ppl in 1 or 2 sectors) I was have some trouble getting more thank 6Mbps down and 1.5Mbps up and an 80-120 ping. That was better than the avg 80kbps down and 66kpbs up with 1500-2500ms ping my EVO LTE was getting in the same areas, you could tell the Sprint network was struggling those 3 days.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By lilotimz

      Ericsson RRUS31 B25 + RRUS11 B26
      These are the newest and greatest remote radio units to come from Ericsson. 

      The new Ericsson RRUS31  B25 should be fairly distinctive compared to the earlier RRUS11s and now the RRUS12s being deployed by ATT and Verizon. One of these new RRUS31s can do the job of two earlier RRUS11s thus reducing deployment costs for Sprint and complexity in deploying new sites and making it easier for users to spot as there are now 4 jumpers coming out of one RRUS31 rather than two from each RRUS11 that Ericsson originally deployed. 

      All future deployments will be utilizing the new Ericsson RRUS31s. In addition Ericsson are sending crews to their original deployments and swapping out older RRUS11s for these new RRUS31s due to the aforementioned fact that one RRUS31 can do the job of 2 RRUS11s. Weight savings will be significant at sites where there are 4 or 5 RRUS11 B25s that can be replaced by one or 2 RRUS31s. The Ericsson RRUS31 deployment project is known as the 65 Mhz Project. 


      Ericsson RRUS11 B26 top and RRUS31 B25 bottom


      Ericsson High Capacity / 4x4/2 MIMO Deployment
      Note the additional antenna + PCS radio.
      Previously Ericsson utilized additional PCS radios and used RF combiners for high capacity setups where they utilized three or more PCS radios. This new setup will utilize a completey new antenna + radio set just like Samsung and run 4x2 MIMO on the LTE antenna / radio set. 



      Ericsson RRUS11 B25 [EOL'd] and B26
      A standard Ericsson Network Vision 1.0 site with 3 RRUS11s where two are dedicated to PCS and one to SMR.  

      This type of setup is no longer deployed or utilized in new sites. Existing sites will be slowly converted to newer RRUS31 B25 via the Sprint 65 mhz project. 

      Ericsson NV high capacity site [EOL'd]
      3 or 4 PCS RRUs are present for a total of 4 or 5 RRUS11s per antenna. 



      Close up of Antennas

      Ericsson cabinets 

      All credit to those who took the photographs. They know who they are!
    • By danlodish345
      Hey guys I found another newsletter about Sprint and Cox. I'll be posting the article here.
    • By lilotimz
      Here are the Alcatel-Lucent (ALU) Network Vision equipment for Sprint. Their equipment consists of 2x base stations, 6 or 9 Remote Radio Unit (RRU) setups, and 1 standard NV antenna of with connectors on the bottom (4x PCS, 2x SMR). 

      Below are images of Alcatel-Lucent equipment. In these images, you will find Alcatel-Lucent base stations, Sprint Network Vision antennas, PCS 1900 & SMR 800 RRUs, and their configurations.
      Alcatel-Lucent 4x40w 25 MHz PCS 1900 B25 RRUs (Panasonic) [old]

      Alcatel-Lucent  4x45w 1900 MHz B25 RRU 

      ALU 2x50w B26 800 MHz RRU [KMW Communications]

      Older Panasonic Setup [4x40w 25 MHz B25]

      Standard Alcatel-Lucent Setup 
      Utilizes 2x50w 800 MHz B26 RRU and 4x45w 1900 MHz B25 RRU and compatible antennas. 

      Closer Look at the connectors on the bottom of the antennas

      Special Case Mexican IBEZ Setup
      Note the lack of 800 MHz RRUs though the antennas are capable of 800 MHz. 

      High Capacity Setup

      High Capacity no SMR 800 IBEZ setup

      * Credits go to those whom took the images of these equipment. You know who you are."
    • By danlodish345
      hello everyone i m starting a thread for sprint network predictions for 2018. i am wishing sprint and s4gru a happy holidays and new years. 
      regards Daniel
    • By mikejeep
      Hello all,

      I have been visiting S4GRU for quite some time, and one of the most common issues I see popping up is confusion from users--especially when they first get 4G LTE devices and/or LTE service--regarding their signal strengths. For some reason, the signal bars on many devices do not display what most users expect them to display. It seems strange that we have to enter special dialer codes just to see what our LTE signal is!

      With that in mind, I started creating an Android app from scratch. I had never created an app before, so it took a few months before it was ready for the public, but its time has come. Robert and a few others have been beta testing it for me since October, and I recently released it onto Google Play. Robert gave me the go-ahead to give it a mention here on S4GRU, so here goes..

      It's called SignalCheck, and it is available on Google Play here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/developer?id=Blue+Line+Computing
      The "Lite" version is free; the "Pro" version has a small one-time fee but includes a bunch of extras, including signal bars in the notification area, a widget, the ability to alert a user when they pick up an LTE or 800 SMR signal, one-button instant connection reset, the street address of the connected 1X site, and menu shortcuts to some screens that are usually only accessible with dialer codes. I intend to offer S4GRU Premier Sponsors special benefits in the near future, as soon as I figure out a feasible way to do that.

      This is the first app I have ever developed, so I'd appreciate any and all feedback, both positive and negative. I have been trying to educate myself as much as possible regarding cellular technologies, as I didn't know much before I started this project. My goal is to make this app as accurate and useful as possible for all the "nerds" on here.. myself included!

      I intend to continue squashing bugs as they are reported, and adding features as they are requested. As I learn more about Android programming and cellular technology, I'll improve things. Please let me know what you would like to see, and I'll do what I can.
      My "Beta Crew" helps test out the app before public updates are pushed out. Membership is by invite only but anyone is welcome to join in our discussions or get a sneak peek at what is going on (see thread here).
      Links:  SignalCheck Help / FAQ  |  Change Log  |  To-Do "Wish" List  |  Known Issues  |  SignalCheck on Google Play
      Here are some screen shots from a previous version.. there have been tweaks since this release, but this is basically what you get:

  • Posts

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.