Jump to content

Clearwire TDD-LTE Network to Serve 4G "Hot Zones" in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Seattle and More


marioc21

Recommended Posts

It is possible to use the WiFi antenna to run 2500/2600 LTE if the chipset/radio are designed for it in the device. Of course, you wouldn't be able to run WiFi at the same time. But who needs that?

 

The new iPhone will be 95% ready to support LTE 2500. Will Apple want to take it that last little bit further to support Clearwire's upcoming TD-LTE network? We will see.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can definitely use the WiFi antenna for Clearwire frequencies. Is it optimal? No, but then very few things are. PCS antennas in handsets are tuned to the middle of the PCS band and not for each block (A-G). Simple antenna design for cellular systems is full of compromises. Try sticking 4-way MIMO antennas in a 700MHz handset! According to the formulas for a 750MHz center frequency each of them would have an optimal length of 40 centimeters (15.75") and there would be 4 of them. Try and fit that into a 4.7" handset!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a radio antenna engineer. I'm just telling you what I've read.

 

http://www.pcmag.com...,2400875,00.asp

 

That's actually pretty cool.

 

If an existing LTE carrier signs up with Clearwire, its phones will be able to do soft handoffs, flipping between the two LTE networks without breaking a call or dropping a connection, Saw said.

 

That's very awesome to hear they can soft hand-off between FD-LTE and TD-LTE. I think 4ringsnbr was saying that couldn't be done due to different gateways, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow thanks man. So I take it that the green dots mean that those towers will pretty much be get LTE and the red dots won't get any LTE love? Or does the red dots mean Clearwire plans to add LTE to them if costs permit? I am not too keen on what the green, red and yellow zones mean.

 

That is correct. Clearwire is focusing more in the green areas for LTE right now. The red areas may change in the future to support LTE also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not a radio antenna engineer. I'm just telling you what I've read.

 

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400875,00.asp

 

Now that's intriguing there!

 

Share the WiFi antennae to use clears 2.5GHz network.....well that answers some of the hardware antennae possible issues with needing to frame more in the phone...

 

My question would be that, would the phone need to disconnect from LTE to search for WiFi connections since you couldn't connect to both at same time, or no?...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Now that's intriguing there!

 

Share the WiFi antennae to use clears 2.5GHz network.....well that answers some of the hardware antennae possible issues with needing to frame more in the phone...

 

My question would be that' date=' would the phone need to disconnect from LTE to search for WiFi connections since you couldn't connect to both at same time, or no?...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2[/quote']

 

Probably. It would likely have to do one or the other. However, if I try to turn on my WiMax on my E4GT now, it tells me I have to turn off my WiFi. So not much difference really.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's probably just one antenna for 800MHz (SMR spectrum) and 850MHz (Verizon/ATT cellular frequencies). I thought I had read somewhere that Qualcomm was going to support just three sets of frequncies (antennas/preamps).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that's intriguing there!

 

Share the WiFi antennae to use clears 2.5GHz network.....well that answers some of the hardware antennae possible issues with needing to frame more in the phone...

 

 

If that is the case, then wouldn't the new EVO 4G LTE be able to use the Clear's LTE since the S4 does TD-LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If that is the case, then wouldn't the new EVO 4G LTE be able to use the Clear's LTE since the S4 does TD-LTE?

 

Not unless it passes back through the FCC again.....

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is the case, then wouldn't the new EVO 4G LTE be able to use the Clear's LTE since the S4 does TD-LTE?

 

If we take the comments from Clearwire's CEO at face value and extremely literally, then we could conclude that any LTE device that has a WiFi antenna and a chipset and modem that support TD-LTE could be modified to run on Clearwire's TD-LTE network. I would love to hear more info on it though. Because as of today, the only place I've seen anyone say that is the quote referenced in this thread. :scratch:

 

On another note, we have seen lots of things from Sprint and Clearwire relating to TD-LTE, but I have yet to see anything that confirms the concept of going back and getting existing LTE devices an update to run on the 2500 TD-LTE network. But I am intrigued at the thought.

 

Wouldn't that be a trivial thing to do or would there be a lot of red tape to overcome?

 

I don't think it is a big deal to resubmit it to the FCC for testing of the new frequencies. But in the case of the EVO LTE, if there was a way to modify the device with an OTA to make it run Clearwire TD-LTE, then they would have to get it tested through the FCC before pushing that OTA.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably. It would likely have to do one or the other. However, if I try to turn on my WiMax on my E4GT now, it tells me I have to turn off my WiFi. So not much difference really.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

That totally makes sense to me. If Clearwire can take advantage of using the wifi antenna that would be awesome since the phones have limited space. You can't run wifi and 4G anyways so it makes sense you that you use one or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could this be the reason why Sprint said the LTE phones wouldn't support WiMax (LTE+WiFi sharing). Just a thought...

 

I'm not sure I follow you. However, a WiMax device cannot have it's WiFi antenna and software be modified to run LTE. It takes a LTE device to be able to modify it that way. But I am probably completely misunderstanding what you are trying to say.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, what I was trying to get at, was that there is probably some limitation to sharing the same antenna, like either WiFi+Wimax or WiFi+LTE but not WiFi+Wimax+LTE. Yea I know a Wimax phone couldn't support LTE, sorry for the confusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, what I was trying to get at, was that there is probably some limitation to sharing the same antenna, like either WiFi+Wimax or WiFi+LTE but not WiFi+Wimax+LTE. Yea I know a Wimax phone couldn't support LTE, sorry for the confusion.

 

The antenna can be shared with several technologies in many instances. Like 1x and EVDO can share an antenna. Apparently, the Clearwire CEO thinks that WiFi and LTE antennas can be shared. They just would not be able to operate at the same time.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I thought this was interesting:

 

For carriers, carrier aggregation technology holds potentially large benefits. By bonding non-contiguous spectrum into a single, wider channel, carriers can address the asymmetry of data flows between downlink and uplink channels. The data traffic that is growing the fastest is video, and it is asymmetrical traffic. As such, carrier aggregation helps operators efficiently manage these downlink flows.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...