Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)


Craig

Recommended Posts

Wow now that's impressive. This shot was my best. I have gotten forties allot but since update on my g2 I can't connect to anything except band 25. But I know why and its all good

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a band 41 test result from the nexus 5 thread, I'm pretty sure sprint is still winning the max speed contest.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Not true on that front. 

 

Verizon 20x20 mhz FDD-LTE markets have speeds up to 100 mbps dl as well and can probably reach more but they aren't provisioned higher. 

 

In terms of max theoretical speeds 20x20 FDD-LTE >= 20+20 TDD-LTE > 15x15 mhz FDD-LTE > 20 mhz TDD = 10x10 mhz FDD-LTE > 5 mhz FDD-LTE > 3 mhz FDD-LTE.

 

Sprint is only deploying, at this moment, one 20 mhz TDD-LTE carrier capable of max theoretical speeds of 90/25 but in real world is closer to ~70/20. Currently Tmobile and Verizon are the ones who can deploy greater than 10x10 FDD-LTE carriers with Sprint having the capability to match 10x10 with 20 mhz TDD carriers. ATT is the only stuck in a precarious situation with not enough contiguous spectrum to deploy greater than 10x10 so they will be at the bottom in terms of speeds once all 4 carriers are built out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a band 41 test result from the nexus 5 thread, I'm pretty sure sprint is still winning the max speed contest.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

It's that here in Denver?, that's a really nice speed, but like s4gru said not to many people is using that band. Anyways that's a great speeds, hope the galaxy s5 is gonna be a Triband phone

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true on that front.

 

Verizon 20x20 mhz FDD-LTE markets have speeds up to 100 mbps dl as well and can probably reach more but they aren't provisioned higher.

 

In terms of max theoretical speeds 20x20 FDD-LTE >= 20+20 TDD-LTE > 15x15 mhz FDD-LTE > 20 mhz TDD = 10x10 mhz FDD-LTE > 5 mhz FDD-LTE > 3 mhz FDD-LTE.

 

Sprint is only deploying, at this moment, one 20 mhz TDD-LTE carrier capable of max theoretical speeds of 90/25 but in real world is closer to ~70/20. Currently Tmobile and Verizon are the ones who can deploy greater than 10x10 FDD-LTE carriers with Sprint having the capability to match 10x10 with 20 mhz TDD carriers. ATT is the only stuck in a precarious situation with not enough contiguous spectrum to deploy greater than 10x10 so they will be at the bottom in terms of speeds once all 4 carriers are built out.

Ewh, well thanks for clearing that up. I have never seen/heard of one of them reaching higher speeds than 50mbs. Oh well they can keep their title while I laugh at the data capped plans/crappy rural coverage. Switching from the blue carrier to yellow was the best mobile related decision I've made(other than getting the n5), I use more per month on Pandora now than my 2gb data plan from the blue carrier...

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's that here in Denver?, that's a really nice speed, but like s4gru said not to many people is using that band. Anyways that's a great speeds, hope the galaxy s5 is gonna be a Triband phone

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

All phones on sprint from 2014 onward should be triband.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ewh, well thanks for clearing that up. I have never seen/heard of one of them reaching higher speeds than 50mbs. Oh well they can keep their title while I laugh at the data capped plans/crappy rural coverage. Switching from the blue carrier to yellow was the best mobile related decision I've made(other than getting the n5), I use more per month on Pandora now than my 2gb data plan from the blue carrier...

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

That's what I'm here I use around 10 gigs a month.... And that will be a expensive bill with Verizon or att

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I'm here I use around 10 gigs a month.... And that will be a expensive bill with Verizon or att

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

I think I hit 7 for January and I'm at 5.5 right now for February. This is me being on 3g 95% of the time(25-50kbs speeds during peak times, 50-100 from 10pm-4am). When the LTE hammer finally hits my home it'll probably be up around 30-40gigs a month. I use my phone for every minor internet task(no tablet here so its convenient for me).

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Verizon 15MHz Band 4 speeds here in South Dakota are usually 30-40Mbps. VZW speeds above 50Mbps are not common. Even in 15-20MHz markets. They desperately needed Band 4 here. Our Band 13 speeds were between 500kbps and 2Mbps. Now with a second band, they have increased to 2-6Mbps again.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice no one has answered you. So I'll try. If we get Spark, and all signs on this site lead to that, I here that our competitors are getting 10 to 20 Mbps download speads. With Spark, in the early stages, we should get minimum  10 but up to 50 Mbps download. We are going to kick aaaaaa, until the Denver clientelle, wants to jump back on the wagon. We have lost thousands of Sprint clients in the last few months because of lack of 4g lte. All of us should have blazing speeds, as Robert wrote in this thead, yesterday or the day before. I am now open for rebuttle and my lack of knowledge...... Santa

Thanks Santa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it this a verizon phone on sprint network ? It seems that sprint is deploying more of 2500 mhz lte. I was geting lte on my lg g2 on d line light rail and in downtown in places where my lg g was not geting any lte.

I don't have Sprint service. Sprint devices will not work on Verizon LTE. Sprint is deploying LTE on 800MHz, 1900MHz and 2600MHz in Denver.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asumed that iphone comes with number of difrent bands and you have it running on sprint lte. You right it is 2600, i dont understand logic behind sprint deployment starting with frequencies that is not supported by most lte phones. Is sprint deploying diffrent towers with diffrent frequencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asumed that iphone comes with number of difrent bands and you have it running on sprint lte. You right it is 2600, i dont understand logic behind sprint deployment starting with frequencies that is not supported by most lte phones. Is sprint deploying diffrent towers with diffrent frequencies.

 

Since none of the big four carriers roam on anyone's LTE networks, why does it matter?  The iPhone 5 only works on B25 (1900) on the Sprint network.  The iPhone 5s/5c only work on B25 and B26 (800).  So far, no iPhone U.S. model supports B41 (2600).

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asumed that iphone comes with number of difrent bands and you have it running on sprint lte. You right it is 2600, i dont understand logic behind sprint deployment starting with frequencies that is not supported by most lte phones. Is sprint deploying diffrent towers with diffrent frequencies.

The picture I uploaded yesterday was from a Verizon iPhone using Verizon lte I doubt there's a way to make it work on the sprint network

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice no one has answered you. So I'll try. If we get Spark, and all signs on this site lead to that, I here that our competitors are getting 10 to 20 Mbps download speads. With Spark, in the early stages, we should get minimum  10 but up to 50 Mbps download. We are going to kick aaaaaa, until the Denver clientelle, wants to jump back on the wagon. We have lost thousands of Sprint clients in the last few months because of lack of 4g lte. All of us should have blazing speeds, as Robert wrote in this thead, yesterday or the day before. I am now open for rebuttle and my lack of knowledge...... Santa

Coverage is going to be a slightly more interesting question. As all these new antenna's have gone up the crews have not really been held accountable for their lackluster work. Some antennas are pointed incorrectly and this will cause gaps. As we begin to do the permanent maintenance hand-off from Samsung to Ericsson the Ericsson techs are going to be ripping them apart and making sure everything is correct. This takes about 2-3 hours per site, per tech. Look for roughly 6-10 sites to be walked through per day once they get rolling (in about 4-5 months). This puts full stable completion of the phase 1 NV at the end-ish of 2014.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true on that front. 

 

Verizon 20x20 mhz FDD-LTE markets have speeds up to 100 mbps dl as well and can probably reach more but they aren't provisioned higher. 

 

In terms of max theoretical speeds 20x20 FDD-LTE >= 20+20 TDD-LTE > 15x15 mhz FDD-LTE > 20 mhz TDD = 10x10 mhz FDD-LTE > 5 mhz FDD-LTE > 3 mhz FDD-LTE.

 

Sprint is only deploying, at this moment, one 20 mhz TDD-LTE carrier capable of max theoretical speeds of 90/25 but in real world is closer to ~70/20. Currently Tmobile and Verizon are the ones who can deploy greater than 10x10 FDD-LTE carriers with Sprint having the capability to match 10x10 with 20 mhz TDD carriers. ATT is the only stuck in a precarious situation with not enough contiguous spectrum to deploy greater than 10x10 so they will be at the bottom in terms of speeds once all 4 carriers are built out. 

ATT/Verizon/Tmo have all maxed out their switch/network capacity by retrofitting their networks. They will not be able to sustain any more increase in bandwidth. This is the joy of the Network Vision project. That fancy new backbone they put in is specifically designed to maintain the unlimited plans for the foreseeable future, it does not matter to sprint how much you use, you wont be able to ever stress it for 10-15 years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Coverage is going to be a slightly more interesting question. As all these new antenna's have gone up the crews have not really been held accountable for their lackluster work. Some antennas are pointed incorrectly and this will cause gaps. As we begin to do the permanent maintenance hand-off from Samsung to Ericsson the Ericsson techs are going to be ripping them apart and making sure everything is correct. This takes about 2-3 hours per site, per tech. Look for roughly 6-10 sites to be walked through per day once they get rolling (in about 4-5 months). This puts full stable completion of the phase 1 NV at the end-ish of 2014.

Merlin, am I to summize "this puts full stable completion of the phase 1 nv at the endish of 2014" means we probably won't see 4GLte started here until the end of the year? Or are you saying that after it's started, it probably will have holes in coverage, and these probably won't be fixed on all sites until the end of the year? Merci Beucoup!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Merlin, am I to summize "this puts full stable completion of the phase 1 nv at the endish of 2014" means we probably won't see 4GLte started here until the end of the year? Or are you saying that after it's started, it probably will have holes in coverage, and these probably won't be fixed on all sites until the end of the year? Merci Beucoup!

 

The latter.

The holes will not be terribly frequent, but we wont know they exist until the legacy network is completely shut down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet that's a scary thought for you and all of the Sprint engineers and workers... Thanks

Indeed. 

These antennas are extremely directional and do not deviate from their path. A 1-2 degree misalignment can easily end up missing an entire neighborhood. Once a cluster goes live we send out several trucks to the area to map out the signal strength so it won't be Swiss cheese, but it certainly wont be optimized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...