Jump to content

Coverage Map Updated 2/16/2018


Recommended Posts

Post below what changes you notice.

EDIT: Seems that Cumberland, MD has 3G only data back on the map. Last month they removed it completely, but the towers are still on. The map is highly inaccurate having 3G only data in areas where there are Extended LTE coverage, and vice versa. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever since the massive B41 coverage overhaul for Cleveland, OH market back in December, they haven't kept up with adding B41 new coverage from sites that have been live for over a month. :wall:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2018 at 7:55 AM, RAvirani said:

Take a peek at Rapid City, SD ;) .

That's B41 only from the Protection Site.  The roaming pseudo native is from Golden West Wireless.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's B41 only from the Protection Site.  The roaming pseudo native is from Golden West Wireless.




Way to ruin our hopes of actual expansion coming. Lol. I’m also hearing 800mhz is close to clearing for SoCal soon. ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Joski1624 said:

Ever since the massive B41 coverage overhaul for Cleveland, OH market back in December, they haven't kept up with adding B41 new coverage from sites that have been live for over a month. :wall:

I imagine it takes time for this information to flow across teams. I’m not sure what the lead time is for generating the Coverage Map updates, but perhaps that has something to do with it.

If you’re aware of specific sites that are missing, you should mention it in a reply to /u/Craig-S (https://www.reddit.com/user/Craig-S) on the Sprint Subreddit in this current Coverage Map thread:

/u/Craig-S is one of the people in charge of Sprint’s Coverage Map, and he’s participating in this thread.

He also said about a month ago in an older Coverage Map thread that they were reviewing all of their processes:

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/18/2018 at 11:13 AM, RedSpark said:

I imagine it takes time for this information to flow across teams. I’m not sure what the lead time is for generating the Coverage Map updates, but perhaps that has something to do with it.

If you’re aware of specific sites that are missing, you should mention it in a reply to /u/Craig-S (https://www.reddit.com/user/Craig-S) on the Sprint Subreddit in this current Coverage Map thread:

/u/Craig-S is one of the people in charge of Sprint’s Coverage Map, and he’s participating in this thread.

He also said about a month ago in an older Coverage Map thread that they were reviewing all of their processes:

 

I love how much more active Sprint has been on Social Media; Dr. Saw and Craig-S especially!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mike, are you still recommending that this beta only be used on on dual psim/esim devices or should it now be basically safe for all devices (with usual beta risks)?
    • A new SignalCheck Pro beta is rolling out right now with LOTS of bug fixes.. and some new features. The full changelog is in the app or on the website. In addition to many bugfixes, there are some notable new options: Colorize location display to indicate low accuracy (yellow when Trail Logger is enabled) or outdated timestamp (red). This is enabled by default. Enable/disable display of location coordinates with location accuracy and the location timestamp.. so now each value can be individually enabled/disabled. Configure the maximum age of location data before Location Service is restarted; the default remains at 10 minutes but can now be configured as desired. Limit max number of neighbor cells to display (including 0, if you only want to see the summary line). Some users are seeing LTE or NR data persist after a connection is lost. I made some minor changes, but I wanted to get this release rolled out before continuing to dig deeper into that issue since I made so many other changes that may or may not impact this bug. One thing that users can try is to disable the option under Preferences > Display Settings > Show Hidden Data -- that may resolve the issue. Looking forward to feedback! Thanks..
    • Yup. It keeps GPS info up to date while logging. 
    • Looks like GPS Status and Toolbox
    • https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/t-mobile-att-and-verizon-gear-super-bowl T-Mobile DAS upgrades and AT&T under the seats antennas are interesting. Hopefully someone gets pictures and details of the under the seats antennas.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...