Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I posted a comment about this in the Samsung thread but thought I would throw it out here because it might be a network issue possibly?

 

I just made the switch to Sprint last Friday with 2 S7 edges for me and my wife. I haven't been able to make or receive HD calls on these phones since we switched over??

 

I went to the store and they said that I should be able to make and receive HD calls on the S7 edge. They even tried to call me on their phone to mine and it showed attempting HD call on their end but the end result was no HD call??

 

I was looking forward to keeping some version of HD voice (WB enabled codec through 1x advanced) when I switched from T-Mobile after using their VOLTE which was crystal clear as I still use my phone as a phone and the downgrade to standard voice quality from VOLTE is very noticeable.

 

Any thoughts guys on why my call log doesn't show HD calls between me and my wife nor does it say attempting HD call? Is it network related or market related issues with the S7 edge?

 

Thx

Posted

Did you integrate with Google voice?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I have, does that cause problems? Because hd voice seems to work when I make a local call but when I call my brother in a different state it never works.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I have, does that cause problems? Because hd voice seems to work when I make a local call but when I call my brother in a different state it never works.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't know why, but Google voice integration completely blocks HD voice for me. Luckily hangouts calls sound almost as good.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Posted

Did you integrate with Google voice?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Nope never even used Google voice before....It's frustrating that I can't make or receive HD calls yet :(

Posted

Nope never even used Google voice before....It's frustrating that I can't make or receive HD calls yet :(

Send a tweet out to Marci's team. She can will some engineers involved. Sounds like a bug in your market with the S7. Possibility.

Posted

Nope never even used Google voice before....It's frustrating that I can't make or receive HD calls yet :(

Do you have wifi calling enabled?

Posted

I posted a comment about this in the Samsung thread but thought I would throw it out here because it might be a network issue possibly?

 

I just made the switch to Sprint last Friday with 2 S7 edges for me and my wife. I haven't been able to make or receive HD calls on these phones since we switched over??

 

I went to the store and they said that I should be able to make and receive HD calls on the S7 edge. They even tried to call me on their phone to mine and it showed attempting HD call on their end but the end result was no HD call??

 

I was looking forward to keeping some version of HD voice (WB enabled codec through 1x advanced) when I switched from T-Mobile after using their VOLTE which was crystal clear as I still use my phone as a phone and the downgrade to standard voice quality from VOLTE is very noticeable.

 

Any thoughts guys on why my call log doesn't show HD calls between me and my wife nor does it say attempting HD call? Is it network related or market related issues with the S7 edge?

 

Thx

HD Voice rarely works for me, even when I was on my LG G3.  It only works about 50% of the time when calling my sister's Sprint phone and she is in Chicago.  Either way, Sprint's voice quality is a lot better than the other carriers, so it doesn't matter that much.  If only HD voice would work carrier to carrier, that would be great.  I'm tired of mushmouth Verizon callers.

  • Like 2
Posted

I don't know why, but Google voice integration completely blocks HD voice for me.

 

With Google Voice integration, reports are that your calls have to be transcoded, probably to PCM, in order to pass through Google's servers.  At this point, if there is any transcoding away from EVRC-NW, such as in a call to a landline, then the call will not be HD voice.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Posted

HD Voice rarely works for me, even when I was on my LG G3.  It only works about 50% of the time when calling my sister's Sprint phone and she is in Chicago.  Either way, Sprint's voice quality is a lot better than the other carriers, so it doesn't matter that much.  If only HD voice would work carrier to carrier, that would be great.  I'm tired of mushmouth Verizon callers.

 

I very much agree with you regarding Sprint's voice quality. When I was on Sprint a few times last year, it was a definite improvement over what I've been use to using T-Mobile. I'm not sure if it were HD Voice active during my phone calls using the Nexus 6 and the Kyocera devices on Sprint, but what I liked about Sprint's voice quality is how the sound was clear and more deep-sounding, very rich-like, similar to the sound of someone speaking over a high-end loudspeaker using professional grade equipment and microphone. Whereas, T-Mobile sounds more robotic and static-like with breakups in the transmission. I made a very good post explaining the sound differences back then better than I'm explaining right now. I'll search for it and post it here for a better idea of what I mean.

Posted

Ah, I found it! I'll post the link, then I'll also add to here the content of the post I wrote back then. Here is the link : http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/6950-t-mobile-lte-network-discussion-v2/?p=420816

 

Here is the content of what I wrote, which really explains what I've noticed in the voice quality differences between Sprint and T-Mobile, which I prefer Sprint's voice quality quite a bit more than T-Mobile's. A quick note, I was responding to gusherb in the post, here :

 

"I didn't answer your question specifically earlier, as I wanted to think of the best way to describe the differences between Sprint's voice quality sound, in contrast to T-Mobile's voice quality sound. Now that I've thought about it for a bit, I think I've figured out an analogy I'm going to use, which I believe is at least fairly accurate.

Sprint's voice quality sounds like someone is speaking through a microphone connected to a good speaker system in an auditorium setting. It is crisp and clear, as long as the person is not speaking too loudly, as it would create an issue for the microphone's sensitivity, which causes artifacts.

T-Mobile's voice quality sounds like someone is speaking through a toned-down megaphone, which despite the volume not being as high, still produces a bass-less amplified sound. Opposite of Sprint, T-Mobile seems to do better when someone is speaking louder, as it has difficulty picking up softer voices and causes a lot of skipping and static, at least from my experiences with it.

Anyways, that is my assessment of the two, again from my experiences with them. Personally, I vastly prefer Sprint's sound with the occasional artifacts, rather than T-Mobile's tinny loudspeaker-like sound."       

Posted

Do you have wifi calling enabled?

I do not...haven't tried that feature quite yet, glad I have the option though just like T-Mobile

Send a tweet out to Marci's team. She can will some engineers involved. Sounds like a bug in your market with the S7. Possibility.

I wonder if that's what it is, a problem with the S7 in the Denver market?? I'll see if I can reach out to the appropriate personnel at Sprint to try and get a response to this issue?

 

Thx

Posted

<p>@Arysyn  When you did those tests, was TMobile still using the 24kbps on the AMR-WB codec?  IIRC TMobile downgraded on the down low the codec to ~12Kbps I think. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>My personal preference, I use a combo of stuff regularly.  It is pretty rare that I run into garbage where it sounds like Im trying to talk to someone using a 20ft 2in PVC pipe and really have to jam that phone speaker into my ear to hear well.  Mostly happens when I talk to someone on Verizon.  Here I just assume it is poor Sprint/Verizon call transfer.  But in terms of quality, I don't really have a preference cause they all good.  Each codec and technology is going to have its own unique sound, so as long as I can hear you.  I just want a reliable connection, which I seem to get less with VoIP.  Older technology can be a lot more forgiving in that department and can handle better much poorer signals. </p>

  • Like 1
Posted

<p>@Arysyn  When you did those tests, was TMobile still using the 24kbps on the AMR-WB codec?  IIRC TMobile downgraded on the down low the codec to ~12Kbps I think. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>My personal preference, I use a combo of stuff regularly.  It is pretty rare that I run into garbage where it sounds like Im trying to talk to someone using a 20ft 2in PVC pipe and really have to jam that phone speaker into my ear to hear well.  Mostly happens when I talk to someone on Verizon.  Here I just assume it is poor Sprint/Verizon call transfer.  But in terms of quality, I don't really have a preference cause they all good.  Each codec and technology is going to have its own unique sound, so as long as I can hear you.  I just want a reliable connection, which I seem to get less with VoIP.  Older technology can be a lot more forgiving in that department and can handle better much poorer signals. </p>

 

Hey red_dog,

 

I've also had some difficulties getting quotes to work using some of the browsers while on S4GRU. I hope Invision Power Board will fix the issue for the site, especially since Robert is paying a lot of money for their hosting S4GRU.

 

Anyways, I had Sprint in the Spring, then later in the summer last year. I'm not sure what T-Mobile was using for voice quality then, and I'm not sure exactly what they are using now, unless its the same as you mentioned. I find T-Mobile just not sounding very good as compared with Sprint. Then again, Sprint has had many years of excellent voice quality reputation, despite the negatives over the data speeds. I'm not sure why T-Mobile would make the voice quality worse, as I figured this was something meant to get better with the advancements in VoLTE/HD Voice. I've read on Wikipedia there even is an AMR-WB+ codec, which I'm wondering why that isn't being used. It goes up to 48kbit/s, according to the site, which would sound so much better than what you mentioned T-Mobile was using/is using.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Adaptive_Multi-Rate_%E2%80%93_Wideband

Posted

What I would give to hear phone calls on a cellular network come through at 48kbit/s that would be beyond awesome!

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

HD Voice rarely works for me, even when I was on my LG G3.  It only works about 50% of the time when calling my sister's Sprint phone and she is in Chicago.  Either way, Sprint's voice quality is a lot better than the other carriers, so it doesn't matter that much.  If only HD voice would work carrier to carrier, that would be great.  I'm tired of mushmouth Verizon callers.

Interesting. I've found that AT&T/T-Mobile's sound quality is much better than Sprint, and way better than Verizon's. Does AT&T use FR (12.2) or HR (5.9) in your market? What about T-Mobile? I'm assuming that would be WB. Sprint-to-Sprint calls are great, but I feel like that's the same with every carrier. (VZ-VZ), (T-T), (TMO-TMO)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was it like only 1.2MB?  I had a tiny one last night but no date change as I was already on November here.
    • Nov 1 play system system update.
    • A new apartment building in my neighborhood is getting a 4G/5G DAS installed. No idea if it's going to be carrier agnostic or if it's going to be just for one carrier. The antennas they are using cover the full range of spectrum from 600MHz-4.9GHz so no telling by equipment alone. I noticed a ton of Cat6E ethernet being run in the garage a couple of days back and then I saw a guy running the ethernet through the ceiling yesterday and didn't think to ask what for until I noticed this antenna this morning mounted on a wall outside near the ramp but with nothing connected to it at the moment.     The garage attendant told me that the phones that are provided to them by the parking management company are on Verizon and they're the only carrier without coverage down there so the building management told them that they're "installing something to fix it". So as far as I know, this will work on Verizon but I'm curious to see who else will get a boost too. — — — — — Without exaggerating, I have mapped a new at least one new small cell on my way to work every day this week. I don't know who the regional network managers for NYC and Boston are, but other cities need to take a page from their book about small cell buildouts. And it's not just upgrades of existing small cells, it's new ones too. Not to mention pings near 10ms on all of them.
    • Yep, 562.51MB December 1 sec patch just found here tonight as well. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...